Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-19 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011/6/19 Alex Balashov : > Well, here's what 3261 12.1.1 ("UAS Behavior") says on the subject: > >   When a UAS responds to a request with a response that establishes >   a dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all >   Record-Route header field values from the request into the >   re

Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Alex Balashov
On 06/18/2011 06:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: indeed, if 183 does not copy record-route headers is not much to do in A side -- I expected that any 1xx reply apart of 100, and especially 183 to mirror record-route headers. I searched a bit and in several cases I could spot, the 183 had

Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 6/19/11 12:03 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: My understanding is that the deficiency in the standard here is that B is not required to copy RR headers into provisional responses, only final ones. indeed, if 183 does not copy record-route headers is not much to do in A side -- I expected that any

Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Alex Balashov
My understanding is that the deficiency in the standard here is that B is not required to copy RR headers into provisional responses, only final ones. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 W

Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Alex Balashov
On Jun 18, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > iirc, the PRACK should follow the record-routing as part of its early dialog > state. At least, from my experience the PRACKs I saw so far were sent to the > proxy address due to record routing, not directly to contact address in 18

Re: [SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/18/11 11:05 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: (Sorry for cross-posting from Sip-Implementors; however, upon some reflection this is really more of a Kamailio mechanics question.) Greetings, I have a scenario where endpoint A is calling endpoint B through proxy P. Endpoints A and B are o

[SR-Users] 100rel without direct reachability

2011-06-18 Thread Alex Balashov
(Sorry for cross-posting from Sip-Implementors; however, upon some reflection this is really more of a Kamailio mechanics question.) Greetings, I have a scenario where endpoint A is calling endpoint B through proxy P. Endpoints A and B are on different networks that are not directly reachable