Re: [SR-Users] Custom fr timer for dialog's OPTIONS keep alives

2014-04-17 Thread Vassilis Radis
oute callback > of your own making). That's not the case here. > > > On 17 April 2014 15:33:57 GMT+04:00, Vassilis Radis > wrote: > >> Hello, I would like to try customizing the fr_timer for the OPTIONS >> keep-alive msgs transactions that the dialog module s

[SR-Users] Custom fr timer for dialog's OPTIONS keep alives

2014-04-17 Thread Vassilis Radis
Hello, I would like to try customizing the fr_timer for the OPTIONS keep-alive msgs transactions that the dialog module sends. I tried to call t_set_fr() function from inside the dialog modules's code (in dlg_req_within.c , in dlg_send_ka() function after the call to d_tmb. t_request_within(&uac_r)

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog: Keep-alive issue:

2014-04-08 Thread Vassilis Radis
d I would like to make it less for this specific use (dialog keep-alives) Thanks. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Vassilis Radis wrote: > Thanks Kelvin, but I already have tried this. This is exactly what I wrote > that the issue is: Despite having set those options, and the keep alive

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog: Keep-alive issue:

2014-04-08 Thread Vassilis Radis
t_property("ka-src"); > dlg_set_property("ka-dst"); > > thesse 2 will make sure that keep alive timers will apply to the current > dialog > > Kelvin Chua > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Vassilis Radis wrote: > >> Hello, &g

[SR-Users] Dialog: Keep-alive issue:

2014-04-07 Thread Vassilis Radis
Hello, I am trying to use the dialog module for dealing with some cases where clients do not send BYE messages correctly and just disappear. For this reason i use the ka_timer and ka_interval along with ka-dst and ka-src attributes. I am using the master branch. I have setup the following test: I

Re: [SR-Users] How can I use a module from the devel branch in a stable varsion installation

2013-10-27 Thread Vassilis Radis
Thanks, juha, yes I did that and it worked. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Vassilis Radis writes: > > > "kamailio: ERROR: [sr_module.c:422]: version_control(): ERROR: > > module version mismatch for > /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/rtpproxy

[SR-Users] How can I use a module from the devel branch in a stable varsion installation

2013-10-27 Thread Vassilis Radis
Hello, I would like to use rtpproxy-ng module from the devel branch in an 4.0.4 installation. I have succesfully compiled the mediaproxy-ng kernel modules. I would like to know if there is a way to compile the rtpproxy-ng module in the devel branch in such a way that I dont get the following error

Re: [SR-Users] Invite Fragmented

2013-10-25 Thread Vassilis Radis
I experienced a similar problem with kamailio and packet fragmentation on a Fedora 17 (32bit with its stock kernel) and kamailio 4.0.1: Some mobile softphones(I think it was Zoiper or CSipSimple on Androids) were configured to negotiate a whole lot of codecs which made the invites have a huge sdp t

[SR-Users] media between 2 clients behind separate NAT

2013-10-25 Thread Vassilis Radis
Hello, When I have 2 clients using a kamailio proxy, and both of the clients are behind their own NAT, then my only options for relaying media between them is using some kind of intermediate rtp proxy or STUN etc? Proxy is on a public IP and essentially I am asking if I can avoid setting up stuff t

[SR-Users] ALIAS_DB module resolving to multiple user@domain does not work when use_domain is set to 1

2013-10-23 Thread Vassilis Radis
The documentation of the append_brances(int) function in ALIAS _DB module says: "If the alias resolves to many SIP IDs, the first is replacing the R-URI, the rest are added as branches." However this only works if not using the domain for resolving, i.e. use_domain is set to 0. This happens beca

Re: [SR-Users] Handling of CANCEL in case of no matching INVITE

2013-05-03 Thread Vassilis Radis
the case 2, you may not > even notice > the ACK is already on its way (because you didn't record-route)... Getting > control > of this would really mean using the dialog module and running in B2BUA > mode rather > than proxy. > > -jiri > > > On 5/3/13 11:59 AM, Va

Re: [SR-Users] Handling of CANCEL in case of no matching INVITE

2013-05-03 Thread Vassilis Radis
12:26 PM, Jiri Kuthan wrote: > On 5/3/13 11:04 AM, Vassilis Radis wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> In the documentation of the t_relay_cancel() (TM module) there is an >> example that reads: >> >> if (method == CANCEL) { >> if (!

[SR-Users] Handling of CANCEL in case of no matching INVITE

2013-05-03 Thread Vassilis Radis
Hello all, In the documentation of the t_relay_cancel() (TM module) there is an example that reads: if (method == CANCEL) { if (!t_relay_cancel()) { # implicit drop if relaying was successful, # nothing to do # corresponding INVITE transaction found but error o

Re: [SR-Users] Manually add Via Header

2012-10-25 Thread Vassilis Radis
Thanks a lot, it worked. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > You better use t_reply("487", "Cancelled") in a failure_route. > > Adding a proper Via header might be a tricky task. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 10/25/

[SR-Users] Manually add Via Header

2012-10-25 Thread Vassilis Radis
I have a situation where a far end SIP provider doesn't behave properly when sending 487 replies. The scenario is this: I have a registered user calling into my kamailio which ,using lcr module, routes the call to a SIP provider. When the caller Cancels the call, my kamailio forwards the cancel me