Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-18 Thread Thomas Baumann
eb 16 20:08:36 m-lab-prx-as-1 /openser/sbin/kamailio[17348]: INFO: > pdb [pdb.c:291]: got an answer in 0.314000 ms > Feb 16 20:08:36 m-lab-prx-as-1 /openser/sbin/kamailio[17348]: INFO: > pdb [pdb.c:291]: got an answer in 0.202000 ms > Feb 16 20:08:36 m-lab-prx-as-1 /openser/sbin/kamaili

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball [http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/] and found this change. How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ? regards, Thomas >

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball  http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/ and found this  change.How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ?regards,Thomas>Hello>I hav

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Baumann
09:33:05 An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote: > I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 > instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamail

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-11 Thread Thomas Baumann
nning Westerholt" Gesendet: 11.02.2011 09:33:05 An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote: > I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 > instances of PDB Server runs on (1

[SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-09 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello, I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on (10.12.19.21). With a small amount of traffic (-cmax 150 -cps 10 -callduration 3), where are timeouts: WARNING: pdb [pdb.c:260]: exceeded time

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst("i"); is inactive only few seconds

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Baumann
: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" Gesendet: 03.02.2011 21:38:49 An: "Thomas Baumann" Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst("i"); is inactive only few seconds Hello, On 2/3/11 7:07 PM, Thomas Baumann wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks for the hints, wi

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst("i"); is inactive only few seconds

2011-02-03 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hi Daniel, thanks for the hints,  with debug_level they are some hints what happened. Normal Operation: 5(20410) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2305]: probing set #1, URI sip:10.12.19.31:5060 5(20410) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2305]: probing set #1, URI sip:10.12.19.21:5060 4(20409) DEBUG:

[SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst("i"); is inactive only few seconds

2011-02-02 Thread Thomas Baumann
Dear sr-users, I use this straight forward dispatcher config.  In the failure route I am calling this function: ds_mark_dst("i"); Also this action is logged: Feb 2 17:20:31 node5 /openser/sbin/kamailio[15945]: INFO: : FAIL_ONE:time [Wed Feb 2 17:20:31 2011] destination sip:10.12.19.31:5060 mar

[SR-Users] pdb module best practice

2011-01-23 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello, I tested the pdb module and the pdb_server. It is a fast solution even with a huge amount of numbers. But how I can update the pdb_server in a fast and effective way ? I tried it in the following way: - number;carrier are stored in a mysql table (20 million entries) - 2 pdb_servers ar

[SR-Users] pdb module best practice

2011-01-22 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello,I tested the pdb module and the pdb_server.  It is a fast solution even with a huge amount of numbers.But how I can update the pdb_server in a fast and effective way ?  I tried it in the following way:- number;carrier are stored in a mysql table (20 million entries)- 2 pdb_servers are running