Re: [SR-Users] Event when acc is written?

Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > To some extent you may be able to do it in configuration file by replacing > the acc default behaviour with sqlops. The records are written by mysql > when 200ok is received (which can be caught via an onreply_route) or a > f

Re: [SR-Users] Contacts replacing each other when registering

Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > there is a mode when the matching is done only on call-id. Have you > checked if they use different call-id? > > Anyhow, knowing the matching mode helps looking into the code in the > right direction. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 07/10/16

Re: [SR-Users] Contacts replacing each other when registering

Hi Daniel, thanks for the reply. Since we didn't configure the matching mode, it is 0 I guess. I actually didn't look into the usrlc module settings. But from the registrations, the Contacts all have a different IP address in it, so they shouldn't replace each other, right? Best Regards, Sebastia

[SR-Users] Contacts replacing each other when registering

Hi, we are running a Registrar server with 4.4.3, the registrar module is configured with the following parameters: modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 50) modparam("registrar", "use_path", 1) modparam("registrar", "path_mode", 0) modparam("registrar", "path_use_received", 1) modparam("registra

[SR-Users] Config changes needed from 4.4.2 to 4.4.3 (and a bug)

Hi, Kamailio release 4.4.3 was tagged as a "bug fix release", no config changes should be needed. However, we had to change two things in our config file to get 4.4.3 running. I thought, I might share those on the list. 1) Defines must not have '-' in the names. In 4.4.2 we had a Define like th

Re: [SR-Users] getting the local 408 response

Hello, On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > if you set t_on_failure() before t_suspend(), then you should get > failure_route executed when the transaction timed out in suspended state. That's exactly how it works. We set up something like this last week. route{

[SR-Users] Calculating time differences

Hi, we are suspending a transaction at one place in our route and resume it later. I want to log the time difference between suspending and resuming. I thought I could do it with saving $TV(Sn), but apparently I can't. Kamailio says, it can't convert the saved value into integer. This true, of cou

Re: [SR-Users] shtinc throws readonly error

Hi, is there a reason to not allow it as a simple operation on a separate line without a left and right side? After all, it's just an incrementation of a value, so why do I have to assign it to a variable (which I don't need at this point) or use it somewhere else? I now included it into an xlog l

[SR-Users] shtinc throws readonly error

Hi, I'm trying to use this line in one route: $shtinc(pushedUsers=>$avp(s:authuser)); However, when checking the syntax of this file, Kamailio says: 0(609) : [cfg.y:3365]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio_sip_proxy.cfg, line 3304, column 2-39: read only

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

Just to not leave the problem unresolved on the list, we finally found out the reason for it. We did an strace on one of the UDP listeners, and there we could see that Kamailio was sending out log messages, but on the wrong file descriptor. Actually, it was sending the log lines to one of our RTP

[SR-Users] t_check_trans() exits route execution if transaction is found

Hi, on one of our systems we are checking a few times whether a transaction already exists. We noticed that route execution stops if the transaction is found. And after looking into the code, we found that it seems to be intended like this. From tm.c: int t_check_trans(struct sip_msg* msg

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4: Kamailio crashes at start - sometimes

After examining this issue a bit more, I'm even more confused. Findings: * When changing the memory manager to qm, Kamailio starts. Tried 3 times with fm, 3 times with qm, had three failures and three successes. * When running with fm memory manager, I can get it running by adding these lines ba

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4: Kamailio crashes at start - sometimes

Hi, it is definitely no memory or open files issue. I stopped all processes and tried to start one of the faulty instances by itself, without luck. Actually, there are core files. I don't know whether they say something interesting, but I just saw that each start attempt produced a core file. Th

[SR-Users] 4.4: Kamailio crashes at start - sometimes

Hi, we have a machine running 16 Kamailio instances, and while upgrading to 4.4.1 (from 4.3.5), 8 of them wouldn't start. When downgrading to 4.3.5, they all start again. All of them have pretty identical configuration files, except IPs, ports and some code enabled or disabled via defines. After

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

Hi, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > there were some changes in the logging system to allow custom "transport" > for syslog messages -- like those implemented by the new log_* modules. > > But they should not affect the old (and still default) mode. I just looke

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded one of our systems today to 4.4.1. And when checking > whether everything is okay, I noticed, that only the first UDP > listener (from kamcmd core.ps) is actually sending lines to the log. > The only ot

[SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

Hi, I upgraded one of our systems today to 4.4.1. And when checking whether everything is okay, I noticed, that only the first UDP listener (from kamcmd core.ps) is actually sending lines to the log. The only other logs I see are from usrloc timer worker. kamcmd> core.ps 10737 main process - atte

Re: [SR-Users] UDP send: Operation not permitted

Hi, just to resolve this thread, we found the reason for the problem. It occurs, when we try sending out packets to a customer, which look identical to netfilter, at roughly the same time. Those could be for example forked calls to two extensions registered on the same device (a FRITZ Box for exam

Re: [SR-Users] TLS module not initialized in 4.3.3, worked in 4.1.5

tantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > run with -E -ddd command line parameters, some of the messages are in > stderror. > > The error is somewhere else, because the the one related to tls is during > shutdown process, therefore something else was detected b

Re: [SR-Users] TLS module not initialized in 4.3.3, worked in 4.1.5

ons so > kamailio can create fifo file/etc.? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 13/11/15 18:07, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I just moved the TLS config lines up top even before sl and tm module. > Also moved the modparam stuff up there. When starting, Ka

Re: [SR-Users] Loading mohqueue stops kamailio from starting up

Hi, Kamailio tells you, what's wrong. On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:32 AM, David Villasmil Govea < david.villas...@gmail.com> wrote: > 0(5069) DEBUG: [sr_module.c:695]: find_mod_export_record(): > find_export_record: not found > 0(5069) ERROR: mohqueue [mohq.c:390]: mod_init(): Unable to load >

Re: [SR-Users] Grab users password from WWW-Auth header

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com> wrote: > What if I don't need a plaintext password on Kamailio? I mean, I don't > want to user pv_www_authenticate or other auth functions again - I need to > fully control AUTH on API. Is it ok to just send 200 OK to client i

Re: [SR-Users] TLS module not initialized in 4.3.3, worked in 4.1.5

tialized before, actually tls needs to be initialized > and it does some of its init stuff when it is loaded (unlike the common to > do init stuff in mod init). > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 13/11/15 14:16, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > yes, we see thi

Re: [SR-Users] Grab users password from WWW-Auth header

MD5 on its side and compares with encr.passwd >> 4. Sends OK if it's ok, huh >> 5. I receive OK from API and send simple 200 OK to user >> >> Do you see any logical mistakes here? Do I need some speacial 200 OK to >> approve registration, or simple send_reply("

Re: [SR-Users] Grab users password from WWW-Auth header

Hello, if your script can return the password for the user to Kamailio, you could use the pv_*_authenticate functions. You can pass the password to check against to these functions in a pseudo variable. http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/auth.html#auth.f.pv_www_authenticate Best

Re: [SR-Users] TLS module not initialized in 4.3.3, worked in 4.1.5

[sr_module.c:959]: init_mod(): tls > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 13/11/15 12:17, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hello, > > we just updated one kamailio server from 4.1.5 to 4.3.3, and although the > config file is correct and kamailio starts up, it doesn't initialize TLS

[SR-Users] TLS module not initialized in 4.3.3, worked in 4.1.5

Hello, we just updated one kamailio server from 4.1.5 to 4.3.3, and although the config file is correct and kamailio starts up, it doesn't initialize TLS and says " tls support enabled, but no tls engine available (forgot to load the tls module?)" In the log I see: Old shutdown (last lines): No

Re: [SR-Users] dmq_usrloc for writing to DB on one machine

Hi, when inspecting dmq a bit further, I found that in fact there is an autodiscovery built in. When I told registrar 1 and registrar 2 to send to receiver, and told receiver to only send to itself, everything worked. Until the receiver went offline. Then it got disabled by the registrars and no p

Re: [SR-Users] dmq_usrloc for writing to DB on one machine

0, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > iirc, if one node doesn't handle a SIP register itself, should not publish > to other nodes anything. Is this what you are looking for -- one node not > to send to the others? > > Cheers, > Daniel > &

[SR-Users] dmq_usrloc for writing to DB on one machine

Hi, I evaluated the dmq_usrloc module, and it works pretty good if there are two identical machines which replicate their location with each other. But what I actually want to do is to send registrations to an extra machine which is just there for writing the location into a central DB (in one tab

Re: [SR-Users] UDP send: Operation not permitted

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote: > You should look at the OS level, the error is from the kernel. > I know, but dmesg, syslog or kernel log don't say anything. > Are you runing out of sockets/files? It the connection tracker full? > The connection tracking table is monito

Re: [SR-Users] UDP send: Operation not permitted

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Sven Neuhaus wrote: > Could it be that you are trying to send from an ip address that is down > at the time? > Interesting thought, but all interfaces on the machine are up at this time. And we are not manipulating the sending socket, so the address where the pa

[SR-Users] UDP send: Operation not permitted

Hi, we have a load balancer which is handling a lot of SIP traffic all day. There's always 20-40 Mbit SIP traffic going through. From time to time we see in our logs messages like these: Sep 16 09:46:28 ecker /usr/sbin/kamailio[25505]: ERROR: [udp_server.c:591]: udp_send(): ERROR: udp_send: send

Re: [SR-Users] BYE request with Sipp refused

Hi, you need to change the ACK the same way you did change your BYE Request. The 400 Bad Request URI response seems to be geneerated by your Kamailio. But I can't find a matching BYE request with CSeq 2, so I don't know what Kamailio is complaining about. The BYE with CSeq 3 is not directed to t

Re: [SR-Users] BYE request with Sipp refused

Hello, you are probably just sending the BYE to the wrong contact. The 200 OK didn't come from your Kamailio but from the server where the request was dispatched to. So you have to use the URI from Contact header as your new Request URI. (This is true already for the ACK after the 200 OK was recei

Re: [SR-Users] Capture a Match from Regex comparison

Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > there was a bug returning 0 in case of a no match. I just pushed a fix > in master, going to backport it. > the patch is working, thanks. Best Regards, Sebastian _

[SR-Users] Capture a Match from Regex comparison

Hi, we have some cases, where we get multiple PCMA lines with different numbers from a peer. One of our backend systems doesn't handle that correctly. So what I want to do is detect whether there is a PCMA line with a non-standard number in the SDP. This is how an SDP looks like: v=0 o=hiQ9200 29

[SR-Users] Mark CANCEL of one fork when another answers the call - old Kamailio

Hi, I'm looking for an option to mark CANCELs which are generated locally by Kamailio after receiving a 200 OK for another fork of the same call. In the tm module documentation I found the option local_cancel_reason which enables this. This option is available (and turned on by default) in newe

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy-ng and late SDP

Hi Alex, On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > According to the rtpengine module documentation for rtpproxy_manage(), > that's exactly what rtpproxy_manage() does: > > > > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.rtpengine_manage > > i.e. > > -

[SR-Users] rtpproxy-ng and late SDP

Hi, I'm working on a setup, where I have to support late SDP. It is working right now, but I have to use an explicit rtpproxy_offer() when processing the reply to an INVITE without SDP. Is there a way to have rtpproxy_manage() handle those calls automatically? I was thinking of setting a flag in

Re: [SR-Users] Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > I would use an extra branch flag here. > > Keepalives are sent based on nat_bflag and sipping_bflag. You can set both > no matter it is actually a register from a natted phone or not. > That's the solution we tried to implement

Re: [SR-Users] Registrations/TCP (new topic)

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > Actually, it's the latter. Our current high availability setup reilies on > anycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our setup. > > That is in fact an interesting topic. Can you please elaborate a bit more > on this as I

Re: [SR-Users] Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios

ycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our setup. Best Regards, Sebastian -- Dipl.-Inf. Sebastian Damm - VoIP-Engineer - d...@sipgate.de Telefon: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-52 Telefax: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-22 sipgate GmbH - Gladbacher Str. 74 - 40219 Düsseldorf HRB Düsseldorf 39841 - Ges

Re: [SR-Users] Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios

Hi, On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Sebastian Damm writes: > > > Does anyone have a hint, how to keep the IPv6 registrations alive? Thanks > > in advance. > > use tcp. > Okay, should have added: UDP, pleas

[SR-Users] Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios

Hi, while testing IPv6 with customers, we fell over quite a few cases, where customers aren't reachable on inbound calls most of the time. And digging into this, we found the home router firewall as the cause for those problems. Normally, you would think, all the NAT problems cease when switching

Re: [SR-Users] allow_trusted and ipv6 addresses

Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting to learn that mysql views are not using same type as the > source column... > > I guess we should handle this case internally, doing views is quite > common out there. > Interesting to read t

[SR-Users] Get the SDP IP in Kamailio

Hi, since we integrated IPv6 into our existing routing logic, in some cases "fix_nated_sdp" gets called for IPv6 calls, too. (Actually, this just happens because of the mistakenly detected NAT.) But that ends up with a an error in the log. ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:1685]: replace_sdp_ip(): no

Re: [SR-Users] mistakenly detected NAT in IPv6 setup

Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > can you split your checks from nat_uac_test("23") to individual checks > (like nat_uac_test("1"), nat_uac_test("2"), ...) and see which one fails? > Yes. It's the Via check (2). And I don't see w

[SR-Users] mistakenly detected NAT in IPv6 setup

Hi, it looks to me that Kamailio detects NAT without NAT being there, when used in IPv6 scenarios. I have a register, which comes in like this: U 2015/01/23 11:42:31.013284 2a01:1234:123:1234::2:16732 -> 2001:9876:98:9876::aa01:5060 REGISTER sip:domain SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2a01:1234:123:123

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_contact and IPv6

Hi Daniel, Hi Klaus, On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) I guess the initial author know there is no nat in ipv6, so he didn't > bother with. I just pushed a patch for it in master (814c08f3), if > tested and reported to work ok, it can be b

[SR-Users] fix_nated_contact and IPv6

Hi, I'm trying to set up a Kamailio (4.1.3) server which converts between IPv6 and IPv4. Everything looks pretty good. Now I have a test client which sends packets via IPv6, but in contact header, SDP etc. there are still IPv4 addresses. (This comes from some converting from v4 to v6 earlier.) Thu

Re: [SR-Users] Asynchronous sql operation also for acc module?

; And because was asked, I added it to the blogs list as well: > - > http://by-miconda.blogspot.de/2014/10/kamailio-42-tips-8-asynchronous.html > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 21/10/14 11:06, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi, > > I read the article about asynchronous

[SR-Users] Asynchronous sql operation also for acc module?

Hi, I read the article about asynchronous sqlops: http://by-miconda.blogspot.de/2014/10/kamailio-42-tips-4-asynchronous-sql.html I was wondering whether there are any plans of bringing that feature to the acc module, too. We have seen it in the past that a blocking database server brought our pro

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_offer and fix_nated_sdp in one route

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Sebastian Damm writes: > > fix_nated_sdp("1"); > > rtpproxy_offer(); > i would make only one of the above calls depending on if the destination > supports direction:active or not. > But what if I don&#x

[SR-Users] rtpproxy_offer and fix_nated_sdp in one route

Hi, I switched from rtpproxy module to the rtpproxy-ng module lately, and noticed a strange behavior. In my branch route to the device, I have two statements: fix_nated_sdp("1"); rtpproxy_offer(); The first command appends a line with "direction:active" to the SDP. The second one puts the RTP pr

Re: [SR-Users] How to use the ip parameter in rtpproxy_manage()

nd pass the flag > to trust the ip in sdp -- not sure it is going to work, by worth giving a > try. > > Perhaps a flag to overwrite the source IP would be good. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 29/08/14 11:44, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi, > > I have the f

[SR-Users] How to use the ip parameter in rtpproxy_manage()

Hi, I have the following setup: UAC ---> LB ---> Proxy ---> GW In NAT scenarios the loadbalancer detects it, but the proxy communicates with the RTP proxy. I want to send the original caller IP as detected by the loadbalancer (and transported to the proxy) to the RTP proxy. As far as I understa

Re: [SR-Users] check for the number of open branches in Reply

Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> wrote: > It may work catching 200 OK in reply_route, but catching >=300 in > failure route. The failure route is executed only once for all branches (it > chooses the most important response code) > I just tried

Re: [SR-Users] check for the number of open branches in Reply

Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > try to save the number of branches in an avp before t_relay() in > request_route. > I just tried that, but it looks strange. This is how my route for t_relay looks like: route[2] { xlog("L_DBG", "Sending ou

[SR-Users] check for the number of open branches in Reply

Hi, I have a scenario where I want to send a custom SIP package whenever a call is successfully established or definitely missed. This works pretty well, except when a user has multiple devices online. I need to send exactly one packet. When initiating the call I set a flag, in the reply route I

Re: [SR-Users] DB select htable:mod-init doesn't work

Hi Daniel, On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > I used this, because I found it in an example written by you. > http://by-miconda.blogspot.de/2009/12/best-of-new-in-kamailio-300-9.html > > Is there any other way I can initialize a hash with values from a > datab

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Via and RR header added in UDP2TCP scenario

m kernel. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 13/05/14 18:02, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > yes, I've seen it. But I don't want to use it since I can't set it > generally, because this Loadbalancer also serves TLS, and TLS uses a > different port

Re: [SR-Users] DB select htable:mod-init doesn't work

te = 0, > insert_delayed = 0,* > > * affected_rows = 0, start_transaction = 0, end_transaction = 0, > abort_transaction = 0, query_lock = 0}* > > (gdb) > > > > Regards, > > Hugh > > > > *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [ > mailto:sr-users-

Re: [SR-Users] DB select htable:mod-init doesn't work

Hi Juha, you're right, but if that was the problem, we should at least see the second log line after the sql_query. $var(i) is used only after this. Any other hints? Best Regards, Sebastian On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Sebastian Damm writes: > >

[SR-Users] DB select htable:mod-init doesn't work

Hi, I'm trying to fill a hash table on startup in the htable:mod-init event route. But it doesn't work. Kamailio doesn't start at all, but doesn't print out an error in the log. This is what the route looks like: event_route[htable:mod-init] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "Loading Carrier domains in

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Via and RR header added in UDP2TCP scenario

Hi Alex, yes, I've seen it. But I don't want to use it since I can't set it generally, because this Loadbalancer also serves TLS, and TLS uses a different port. Any comments about this difference between the sending socket vs. the advertised socket when not configured specially? Best Regards, Se

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Via and RR header added in UDP2TCP scenario

Hi Alex, On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Have a look at replacing your record_route() call with > record_route_preset(): > >http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/rr.html#idp114624 > > As for the advertised address more generally, i.e. in Via, have a look at >

[SR-Users] Wrong Via and RR header added in UDP2TCP scenario

Hi, we have a setup, where we have a TCP loadbalancer, which converts the requests from attached devices using TCP into UDP for the rest of our setup. This loadbalancer has a service IP, and additionally the host IP, it listens to different addresses. Example: Host IP is: 1.1.1.1 Service IP is: 2

Re: [SR-Users] Limit the number of requests per second based on the user

et destroyed) in our scenario. Up to how many pipes is Kamailio able to handle? Best Regards and many thanks, Sebastian On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 30/04/14 15:43, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi, > > actually, I only nee

Re: [SR-Users] Limit the number of requests per second based on the user

period you want to count > - for each request you add an item with some random key and value being > the user > - use $sthcv(...) to count the number of items that have the value of the > user > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 29/04/14 13:41, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi,

[SR-Users] Limit the number of requests per second based on the user

Hi, I'm looking for a solution to limit the number of call initiations or OPTIONS packets or REGISTER packets per user. Neither pike, nor pipelimit or ratelimit give me the possibility to do this. Limiting it based on the source IP is not an option in our case. Is there a module I can use? Or is

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

rtpproxy to trust the ip in sdp and send the rtp to it as soon as received from the other side. It is the same case as chaining many rtpproxies. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 7/8/13 2:25 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > sorry, I probably didn't expla

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

s part of parameters to rtpproxy functions -- check the readme of the module. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 7/8/13 1:52 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > Hi, > > we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This works fine except for one scenario. > >

[SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

Hi, we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This works fine except for one scenario. Caller -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> B2BUA -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> Called In this case, the B2BUA implements forwarding and sends the call back through our setup. The B2BUA does not send out a 183 rep

Re: [SR-Users] Dumping Online Users stops at 2000 records

Hi Henning, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Henning Westerholt < henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 August 2011, Sebastian Damm wrote: > > we have a script running on our Kamailio servers which dumps all online > > users with kamctl ul show, parses it

[SR-Users] Dumping Online Users stops at 2000 records

0 command 'ul_dump' failed 500 command 'ul_dump' failed 500 command 'ul_dump' failed 500 command 'ul_dump' failed 500 command 'ul_dump' failed Is there a hard limit for dumping users through the fifo? Why? Or should we do it differently? Best Reg

Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route

Hi Daniel, thanks for looking into it again. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > thanks for further investigation. Indeed, the avps were not backed up/restored when sending self-generated request. > > I just committed a patch to tm module in master branch. If you ca

Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route

Hi Daniel, Hi Klaus, after hours of searching I think we found the problem. This is what our route that actually sends out the packets looks like: route[2] { xlog("... START OF ROUTE 2\n"); xlog("AVP LEG_

Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route

Hi, On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > The named reply routes are only executed if t_on_reply() was called for > the request. This reply route will be executed after the default > reply-route. It is triggered by tm module. I just inserted a new reply_route, which just print

[SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route

Hi, I'm still fighting problems in our Kamailio 1.5 to 3.1 migration. Right now I'm stuck with a strange behavior of AVPs in my dialplan. I set a lot of AVPs for accounting in the route directive, and I just inserted an avp_print() statement right before t_relay() is called, all values are set. T

Re: [SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

Hi, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch? I can't see >> how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case. >> > Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire transactio

[SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

Hi, I'm currently migrating a Kamailio 1.5 installation to Kamailio 3.1.3, and I got all config changes merged, except this one: branch_route[1] { if ((isbflagset(4)) && (!isflagset(7))) { fix_nated_sdp("1"); if (has_body()) { forc