e with other clients.
So it seems like handle_rls_update needs to do more than just create
the back-end subscribes.
Any input is appreciated.
Sangeeta
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Hello All,
>Did anyone get a chance to look at my question below?
>
> Can
Hello All,
Did anyone get a chance to look at my question below?
Can anyone explain what will happen when the next hop is the rls
server address? How will this notify get handled.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> I have another follow up question
full notify to the client. But that is not happening.
What is the expected behavior based on what's been described above.
Again thanks for taking the time to read/respond to the email.
Sangeeta
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Peter/Hugh,
> After a bit more
;
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Dunkley
> Technical Director
> Crocodile RCS Ltd
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bi
t is only the external URIs that are causing the problem, kamailio
> may think it is subscribing to the same URI each time causing a recursive
> loop. This may be visible on a network trace taken on the loopback
> interface.
>
> Regards,
> Hugh
>
>
>
> On 26/10/2012 13:
n Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Hello All,
>I am hoping the authors of the RLS/PUA modules can answer this
> question since I am not sure what's going on. I have the rls module
> enabled, with the following config spec:
>
> # --rls module p
@10.50.251.12 to sip:8475551001@10.50.251.12 inserted in
datatbase
Not sure if it's my configuration settings or the contents of the
resource-list xml.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
> I did drop the uniqueness on the
quot;ip")
modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:reginfo@")
modparam("pua", "db_mode", 2)
Is this correct? Am I missing something. Why are so many entries
getting created in these two tables for the same presentity? I don't
see
To be a bit more clear: the server_address has the ip of the kamailio
server. Not sure if that's correct. Also not sure what the pua
default_domain is supposed to be set to: right now it's the server's
ip.
Sangeeta
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> He
t 22 15:22:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[11761]: DEBUG:
[db_val.c:117]: converting STRING [10.50.251.12]
Oct 22 15:22:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[11746]: DEBUG:
[parser/msg_parser.c:628]: uri:
Oct 22 15:22:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[11745]: ERROR:
pua [pua
ny plan to be RCS/OMA compliant in the new future?
I can get SIMPLE PRESENCE with XCAP to work but not with OMA presence
rules and resource lists.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users maili
hat we are capable of oma pres rules. Is
that really true. Looking at the xcap_auth code in the presence_xml
module I don't think I see any parsing being done for the oma tags.
Please advise/comment?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Any input on the question below.
at 5:19 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> So based on the pres rules inserted by the clients, see example below
> it's unclear how Kamailio is handling all the rules. Is Kamailio OMA
> compliant. It definitely doesn't seem to like a condition without an
> identity. IT should be
e-lists/list%5B@name=%22oma_grantedcontacts%22%5D";
/>
allow
http://ip:5060/xcap-root/resource-lists/users/sip:8475551001@ip/index/~~/resource-lists/list%5B@name=%22oma_blockedcontacts%22%5D";
/>
block
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> I mean
right now.
Sangeeta
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> The path is from the resource list xml inserted by the client. The
> issue over here was that the Kamalio code does a case insensitive
> search for %5b and %5d and doesn't replace the path below with the &quo
/>
block
Thanks,
Sangeeta
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> This path does not look ok:
>
>
> /xmlns:resource-lists/xmlns:list%5B@name="rcs"%5D
>
> Where is it coming from?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 10/10/
nloaded from tarball, then use
> 'diff -u oldfile newfile' to generate the patch.
>
> Once we get it, will be reviewed and committed to fix the reported issues.
>
> The new error you get is due to a broken XML document in the body. Can you
> capture the SIP traces (via ngre
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone had any luck getting RLS working with presence.
I am seeing the following errors in my log file:
ct 10 17:20:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2017]: DEBUG:
presence [hash.c:342]: record not found in hash table
Oct 10 17:20:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kam
Any clue what the correct path is supposed to be - per the data in the
xml and the path that's printed out by the module?
Thanks,
Sangeeta
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Daniel,
>I don't know if this corresponds to the errors I was seeing before.
&
So I fixed a few things today
1. In subscribe.c:rls_get_by_service_uri The code was doing a strlen
check as follows:
if((uri->len==strlen(val)) && (strncmp(val, uri->s, uri->len)==0))
The uri coming in is: sip:8475551001@10.50.251.12 and the service
uri in the rls-services list is:
sip:
Daniel,
I don't know if this corresponds to the errors I was seeing before.
But on a closer look I see the following errors when a subscribe
request comes in. This is how I am handling subscribe requests:
if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE"))
{
xdbg(" Handling subscribe re
break;
So I have verified that when I add a contact it calls rls_update_subs.
But it doesn't seem that this logic is triggering a notify to the
client that I am subscribing to.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Daniel,
>I had debug
set debug=3 in your config file and watch the logs messages to
> get more details about what happens there.
>
> I don't have any sip application that supports rls, so I'm not able to test,
> but classic SIMPLE presence should work fine.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
;transport=udp on behalf of
sip:8475551004@10.50.251.12 for event presence
I am using Kamailio 3.3 with Presence and RLS with integrated XCAP.
The only significant change i made today is update the presence and
RLS config to DB ONLY mode.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
, the kamalio server is not sending out an auth request to
client B. Even though it's registered for presence.winfo events.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@
and Boghe (doesn't seem to be behaving as
expected!). Anyone recommend other clients that work for the
functionality I described above.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-
work for a few weeks now and keep running into new problems.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Oct 1, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Cenk İlker İzanlı wrote:
> Hi Sangeeta,
>
> Did you try this tutorial ?
>
> http://nil.uniza.sk/instant-messaging/simple/configuring-xcap-support-im-and-presence-over-kamailio-31-debian-lenny
>
> Maybe you skip one step anywhere.
>
>
> 2012/
ps for the respective clients are
desired I can provide them.
Thanks,
Sangeeta
--
Sangeeta Shah
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
29 matches
Mail list logo
