Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-11-05 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
rker processes are the same for tcp and tls. > > You can forbid tcp traffic from config file: > > if(proto=TCP) { > send_repply("403", "Not allowed"); > exit; > } > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 11/5/12 11:18 AM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote: > >

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-11-05 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
in syslog. An interesting workaround... Is this normal? i.e. is listening on a tcp port mandatory? On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > can you put also: > > listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5060 > > ? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > &g

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-11-05 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
Any idea? I have shared my tls configuration with you in my previous post, and as I said, that configuration works with kamailio 3.2.4. After silence of 4 days, do you confirm that it is a bug? If so, how can it be solved? Any suggestion? On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-11-01 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
In my kamailio configuration, I already have "#!define WITH_TLS". And some more about my configuration: listen=tls:XX.XX.XXX.XX:5061 #!ifdef WITH_TLS enable_tls=yes #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS loadmodule "tls.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS # - tls params - modparam("tls", "config", "/usr/loc

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-31 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
something wrong with your config, be sure > you set proper children parameter value. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 10/31/12 4:53 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote: > > And the output of 'kamctl ps' is as following (after changing back to tls): > > Process:: ID=0 P

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-31 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
send2child: send_fd failed for 0x7f215351b588 (flags 0x4018), fd 17 On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote: > These messages are for tls. When switched to TCP, it works fine. What can > be the problem? > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mie

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-31 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
output of 'kamctl ps'? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 10/30/12 5:32 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote: > > Any ideas? It really seems as a bug, as the logs say. But do you have any > workaround suggestion? > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-30 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
Any ideas? It really seems as a bug, as the logs say. But do you have any workaround suggestion? On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Ramazan Yilmaz wrote: > Hi, > I installed kamailio 3.2.x a few times before and they were really fine. > I decided to install a fresh one and fol

Re: [SR-Users] Question about acc module

2012-10-30 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
Hi, Actually, I can not even register to kamailio, that's why I cannot make any calls. So it is very very unlikely to have INVITEs without corresponding BYEs, right? On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > 29 okt 2012 kl. 14:51 skrev "Thorsten Willand" : > > Hi, > > Maybe t

[SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-30 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
Hi, I installed kamailio 3.2.x a few times before and they were really fine. I decided to install a fresh one and followed the instructions on http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/3.3.x/git. However there is a problem: clients cannot register to kamailio. Each registration attempt produces the fol

[SR-Users] Problem with my kamailio installation

2012-10-29 Thread Ramazan Yilmaz
Hi, I installed kamailio 3.2.x a few times before and they were really fine. I decided to install a fresh one and followed the instructions on http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/3.3.x/git. However there is a problem: clients cannot register to kamailio. Each registration attempt produces the fol