[SR-Users] Kamailio blocked when using with Radius accounting when connection is lost with the database.

2016-07-06 Thread Mx R
Hi there. I have the following scheme. 1. SIP server is running kamailio with module "acc", radiusclient-ng and freeradius. 2. DB server with MSSQL. The problem is the following, if the connection is lost with the database, no one can make calls. Even after the connection to the database is rest

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + fax "other fax not responding"

2016-06-23 Thread Mx R
Hi there. This problem has been solved. We contacted with the supplier. And they sent us instructions how to configure their equipment correctly. Thanks to all. 2016-06-09 10:31 GMT+03:00 Mx R : > Hello Daniel, > > And what about the second part of my question? Someone can prompt wha

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

2016-06-23 Thread Mx R
spirals... > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 01/06/16 18:16, Mx R wrote: > > Thanks Daniel > > modparam("topoh", "mask_callid", 1) > > It worked. > > 2016-05-17 17:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel Tryba : > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:08:45PM +0300, Mx

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + fax "other fax not responding"

2016-06-09 Thread Mx R
Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > On 07/06/16 11:30, Mx R wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Advise please, that it is better to use rtpproxy or mediaproxy? > And what version of rtpproxy better? This one > <https://github.com/miconda/rtpproxy>https://github.com

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + fax "other fax not responding"

2016-06-07 Thread Mx R
quot; port 5060 > > Kamailio itself has nothing to do with media stream (the fax content), > unless you do rtprelay via rtpengine/rtpproxy. If you have clients behind > NAT, then you have to do rtp relaying. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 03/06/16 10:45, Mx R wrote: > >

[SR-Users] kamailio + fax "other fax not responding"

2016-06-03 Thread Mx R
Hi there, We use kamailio 4.3.3. And we have one problem with the fax. We send and receive from and to our network, the fax does not work. Fax reports "other fax not responding". When we send through our network to another operator they receive fax. What could be wrong? ___

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

2016-06-01 Thread Mx R
Thanks Daniel modparam("topoh", "mask_callid", 1) It worked. 2016-05-17 17:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel Tryba : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:08:45PM +0300, Mx R wrote: > > In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model > > HUAWEI-EchoLife

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

2016-05-27 Thread Mx R
route(RTPPROXY); }; sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } 2016-05-17 17:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel Tryba : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:08:45PM +0300, Mx R wrote: > > In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model > >

[SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

2016-05-17 Thread Mx R
Hi there. In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245 / V1R003C00S205 we have the following problem. When connecting to this device in the POTS ports of the two phones. From the first port we can not call to the second and from the second port can no

[SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

2016-05-17 Thread Mx R
Hi there. In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245 / V1R003C00S205 we have the following problem. When connecting to this device in the POTS ports of the two phones. From the first port we can not call to the second and from the second port can no