On 3/25/2013 9:46 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
> 25 mar 2013 kl. 09:23 skrev Miguel Baptista
> mailto:miguel.bapti...@uninett.no>>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been doing some tests with kamailio and IPv6.
>>
>> My initial setup was IPv6 o
On 3/26/2013 5:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 3/25/13 9:23 AM, Miguel Baptista wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been doing some tests with kamailio and IPv6.
>>
>> My initial setup was IPv6 only and now am I extending it to a
>&g
; is IPv6 or IPv4 but it seems that it is "too
late" to use rtpproxy. BTW ... I am assuming that if the "next-hop" is
IPv6 then the final user agent will also be IPv6 (the same for IPv4)
Should I use some other approach? For example, failure route instead?
Does anyone have a si
On 21.09.2012 09:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 9/20/12 5:12 PM, Miguel Baptista wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am testing the "topology hiding" module (topoh) on kamailio-3.2.0
>> and every-time I start kamailio I get these e
e to apply that configuration on my production
servers knowing that kamailio outputs an error when starting.
Thanks,
- Miguel Baptista
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-rou
On 13.02.2012 16:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2/13/12 2:55 PM, Miguel Baptista wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am running kamailio 3.1.3 and I am making some tests with the exec
>> module. I am running a "dummy" script and it worked like
quot; +
ASTSERVIPPORT; # Voicemail
route(RELAY);
}
}
xlog("L_INFO", "TESTEXEC: Exiting ($rU)\n");
return;
}
/
Regards,
Miguel Baptista
Feb 13 12:44:08 test-server /usr/ipbx/kamail
Hi all,
A couple of days ago I sent an identical email but because I wasn't a
member of this list I don't know if you got it or not. Additionally, I
would like to say that I have the same problem with kamailio 3.1.1. This
is very weird problem ..
I am using kamailio 3.1.2 (like I say the same is
Hi all,
I am using kamailio 3.1.2 and I have an issue with failure route.
Every-time kamailio enters the failure route an internal error is
triggered and kamailio sends a 500 SIP error message: /SIP/2.0 500 I'm
terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/TM)/.
Just for testing purpose I "downgraded
=ipaddress...) logic :)
Cheers,
Miguel Baptista
Ps : see you on Monday in Berlin :)
On 17.11.2010 11:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 11/16/10 4:41 PM, Miguel Baptista wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to enable pike module based on IP addresses. I mean ...
whitelist. The
userblacklist module has some whitelist but it's based on
username/domain not IP addresses.
Can someone please give me some advice how to implement it properly. Is
there any module that will allow me to do it properly?
Best Regards,
Miguel Baptista
___
s yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, 0
Sep 20 16:19:57 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16382]:
DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
Sep 20 16:19:57 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16382]:
DBG:core:receive_msg: cleaning up
*Sep 20 16:20:36 sip /home/kamailio/s
ilio[21462]: Warning: too
many requests from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX,:5060
Sep 10 *13:37:52* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21466]: PIKE -
UNBLOCKing node 0xb5986b90
/
but the it didn't seem to have any real difference.
Any ideas? /
/
Best Regards,
Miguel Baptista
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
