oll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
> Original Message
> From: Marrold
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 12:21
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Reply To:
e into the code
for clues.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Marrold wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for the response, I will try using an avp instead.
>
> I interpreted "message flags (or transaction flags) will works as they
> do now, but the branch mask will be removed (
1 (direct)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
> Original Message
> From: Marrold
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:34
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Su
Hi all,
I'm having issues using flags in a t_branch_timeout() of failure_route{}
A brief summary of the code -
onreply_route{
setflag(14);
}
failure_route {
if (t_branch_timeout()) {
xlog("L_ALERT","t_branch_timeout()\n$mb");
if (isflagset(14)) {
xlog("L_ALERT","isflagset(14) -
I'm curious what issue you're trying to fix or what functionality you're
trying to add? If we know the contact, we might be able to suggest a
kamailio only solution.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alex Balashov writes:
>
> > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent cal
> Try:
>
> if(defined $xavp(tm_contacts))
>
> or:
>
> if($xavp(tm_contacts) != $null)
>
Both of the above worked, Thanks!
> I do wish "truthiness" of various sorts were better defined in Kamailio.
>
I don't quite follow what you mean here, but I probably agree with you. In
particular for t_load
First of all I would check the result of -
# kamctl dispatcher dump
SET:: 4001
URI:: sip:10.0.97.17:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=backend=be011
URI:: sip:10.0.97.18:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=backend=be011
SET:: 4002
URI:: sip:10.0.97.21:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs
Hi all,
What's the most efficient way to check if an xavp is set?
I have tried-
is_avp_set() from avpops module
which resulted in-
ERROR: avpops [avpops.c:915]: fixup_is_avp_set(): bad attribute name
<$xavp(tm_contacts)>
and
if ($xavp(tm_contacts)) {}
which resulted in -
WARNING: [rvalue.
Hi,
>>On 06/04/16 01:57, Marrold wrote:
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> I can confirm that t_any_timeout(), and t_branch_timeout() return true
>> when these un-ACKd transactions occur.
> by un-ACKed, do you mean they didn't receive any response or they didn't
&
s
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Marrold wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> I can confirm that t_any_timeout(), and t_branch_timeout() return true
> when these un-ACKd transactions occur.
>
> I just needed to make sure that I set a failure route, in my reply route.
>
> Thanks for t
I use $mb to get the full SIP packet.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
>
> Is it also possible to get the full sip message using a pseudo variable,
> including the sip headers etc?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Grant
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-b
;
> From there you can do what you like.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles
> On 5 Apr 2016 1:22 p.m., "Marrold" wrote:
>
>> I am interested in 'fingerprinting' various SIP scanner attacks and using
>> them to intelligently block attacks, rather than just bli
eout
reached on transmission eff430b8c1b6d21c2058049f41a7ec57 for seqno 1
(Critical Response)
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:09:29AM +0100, Marrold wrote:
> > I have been running a couple of Asterisk honey pots to get a better
Thanks for the speedy response as always.
The current scenarios are taken from Asterisk only, Kamailio is not yet in
front of it - so no record route headers.
I imagine the ACKs aren't being sent due to it being a waste of resources
as you suggest, but I'm interested in detecting these in Kamaili
t;408",
"Request Timeout MH 2");
This was due to my lazy regex whilst debugging. "[456][0-9][0-9]"
Apologies for the noise.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Marrold wrote:
> I've found the following in an old thread that should help me debug, I
> will let the li
Hi,
I have been running a couple of Asterisk honey pots to get a better
understanding of the tools and methods potential hackers are using to
exploit SIP servers.
I have observed many attacks from the 'sipcli' user agent that don't send
ACKs.
At this stage I'm not sure what they're trying to ach
I've found the following in an old thread that should help me debug, I will
let the list know how I get on.
pv_printf("$var(contact)", "$xavp(contacts[0]=>uri)");
xlog ("L_NOTICE", "var(contact)=$var(contact)\r\n");
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:4
t may cause auth issues.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Alberto Sagredo <
alberto.sagr...@avanzada7.com> wrote:
> Hi Marrold. I want to authenticate user on Kamailio but want Asterisk to
> see them registered with kamailio ip as contact.
>
> I making also some manipulations in $fu
Why not just relay the registration messages to Asterisk itself? What's the
use case?
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Alberto Sagredo <
alberto.sagr...@avanzada7.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im trying to modify example for Asterisk/Kamailio integration that miconda
> did, and trying to handle Fo
Hi all,
I am having some issues using get_redirects() from the UAC_Redirect module
in conjunction with t_next_contacts from the TM Module. I've searched
Google and the list but the only references I can find are several years
old.
I am attempting to configure Kamailio so it if receives a 3XX red
Well spotted, I was studying the dispatcher docs but over looked sl.
Thanks
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 03:40 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 03/28/2016 03:37 PM, Marrold wrote:
>>
>> That works, thanks. It turns out the foll
e above.
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
Matthew
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/28/2016 02:39 PM, Marrold wrote:
>
> I'd like to use the Dispatcher Module along with 30X redirects, to
>> monitor gateway
Hi All,
I'd like to use the Dispatcher Module along with 30X redirects, to monitor
gateway availability with SIP options and to provide redundancy / fail
over.
Some sources online suggest it's as easy as -
if ( method=="INVITE" ) {
dst_select_domain("1","4");
sl_send_reply("300","Redirec
That's essentially what I'm hoping for, although I appreciate from an RFC
purist perspective it's probably a bit of a nasty hack.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> So, you mean some sort of scheme wherein...
>
> (1) Kamailio keeps endpoint A in the dark as to the fact that
theoretically possible, although it may not be RFC
compliant or something that Kamailio supports.
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/19/2016 09:43 PM, Marrold wrote:
>
> It should be theoretically possible to remove some of the via and
>> record
ader-diet/
Thanks for the link!
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Marrold,
>
> No, you can't remove those headers. They serve an essential purpose and
> the endpoints won't consider the requests or responses valid without them.
>
> See
Hi,
Is there any way to remove Via and Record-Route headers from requests sent
to an endpoint and update the contact header, but have Kamailio statefully
remember where the replies need to route?
I imagine this would involve mangling the packets slightly to behave
similar to a B2BUA.
My motivati
Hi All,
I am trying to get attributes from the Proxy-Authenticate WWW-Authenticate
and Authorization headers, namely username, realm, uri, nonce, and
response,
I can see some of these are already presented as psuedo-variables, however
nonce and response are not.
What's the most efficient way to
In the case of Asterisk you can set outboundproxy=
On 1 Mar 2016 10:03, "Anton Tonev" wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am a new user of Kamailio (4.3.1), I am working with it since 1-2
> months. The thing that I'm trying to do is to build the following system:
>
> same LAN
>
> 192.168.0.1
> Alice
Forwards limit.
>>
>> Publish URI is PUBLISH sip:2...@kamailio.marrold.co.uk;transport=UDP
SIP/2.0
>>
>> I have two questions,
>>
>> 1) Why is this request being sent a 404, when the UAC is in the USRLOC
table?
>> 2) Why is the request looping until Max Forwa
30 matches
Mail list logo
