ing in contradiction to any RFC.
Best regards,
Joachim
>> On 13/02/15 17:55, Joachim Büchse wrote:
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> I’m experiencing some problems with our VoiP providers handling of REGISTER
>>> requests. We are using a Gigaset PRO N720 as U
no. In your case,
> should not be considered behind nat.
>
> The received parameter in Via header was fixed, but I am quite sure
> 3.2.x doesn't have it, that's quite old. You have to upgrade to a more
> recent version.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 13/02/
Good day,
I’m experiencing some problems with our VoiP providers handling of REGISTER
requests. We are using a Gigaset PRO N720 as UAC behind a Juniper SSG 140 with
SIP-Alg enabled. This setup kind of works with UDP but our provider wants us to
use TCP. With TCP enforced incoming calls don’t wo
