Vladimir-
> Transcoding can be supported in software as well.
Not at high capacity, like 20,000+ AMR-WB calls in a 1U server. My experience
has been that high volume users of SBC
products are SWaP constrained -- especially limited space and power
consumption. Their end customers do not allow
Reda-
> It's clear but not necessary. It can look at radius records fixed by
> mediaproxy on RTP timeout to debit the correct balance as well. And why
> also force it on postpaid calls which it doesn't control at all ?
I don't understand how you plan to tear down Kamailio calls that suffer RTP
t
Mojo-
I'm surprised at the replies you received. Normally the people on this group
are extremely helpful.
Clearly you've spent significant time thinking about this, and your current
system and problem description below is
detailed and well-presented, with a clear rationale for using Kamailio.
Jan-
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya wrote:
>> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
>> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by
>> the number of devices.
>>
>> When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.
Alex-
> It is not supported by rtpproxy. But you could run all that traffic
> inside a high-compression IP-in-IP UDP tunnel, though there would be
> an overhead penalty there too.
We've already extended rtpproxy for transcoding and encryption, we're thinking
to continue with that approach for
h
Daniel-
> On 4/30/10 10:08 PM, Jeff Brower wrote:
>> Daniel-
>>
>>
>>> On 4/30/10 8:24 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2010/4/30 Jignesh Gandhi:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
Daniel-
> On 4/30/10 8:24 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> 2010/4/30 Jignesh Gandhi:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Can openser be used as a SIP Application Server in an IMS infrastructure ?
>>>
>>> Should I use Kamailio instead ?
>>>
>>
>> By definition a SIP proxy is not a "SIP Application Server"(w
Alex-
> > But... is it being considered to add functionality to rtpproxy so it can
> > send
> > something asynchronously to Kamailio which either sends BYEs or does
> > something to
> > cause the endpoints to do so? Currently, as far as I know, rtpproxy only
> > responds to
> > commands from n
Alex-
> On 04/23/2010 06:14 AM, Raphael Coeffic wrote:
> > On 23.04.10 11:58, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >> On 04/23/2010 05:18 AM, Raphael Coeffic wrote:
> >>> On 23.04.10 09:51, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 04/22/2010 10:01 AM, Stefan Sayer wrote:
> ]
> > clean? I am not so sure any more,
Alex, Juha-
> On 04/21/2010 05:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
>> i would prefer a solution that does not involve sip-router dialog module
>> at all. that module tries to accomplish something that is alien to the
>> definition of a sip proxy.
>
> In principle, I would prefer such a solution too; h
Juha-
Vikram had posted a while back on the thread where he explained a bit more
about his resolution and the fact the issue
was occurring with VoipSwitch but not asterisk. Let us know if you want a link
to that.
Thanks for following up.
-Jeff
Original Message -
11 matches
Mail list logo
