Will need to read a bit more to understanding it completely, but I think I
get the gist. Thanks again.
This is an amazing community.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:40 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
> BTW, Daniel - one point in your reply to Al
Thanks again Alex, pretty clear - I suppose.
BTW, Daniel - one point in your reply to Alex caught my attention "I don't
allow client EPs to do redirects"... perhaps this is very simply, but how
is this prohibited ?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2015
ct same as serial forking ?
Apologies for questions that are perhaps more to do with SIP, than Kamilio
itself.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2015 17:56:45 Jayanth Acharya wrote:
> > Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy rol
hov
wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 11:56 AM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
> Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be
>> configured to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302
>> response from B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-
Thanks, that puts my performance worry to rest.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:08 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
> I am new to Kamilio (and SIP in general), but a quick research tells
>> that I've to configure Kamilio to run in the
Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be configured
to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302 response from
B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by the updated Contact
URI) ?
Alternatively, is there a way for the B-party SIP UAS to get the proxy
