Re: [SR-Users] new keepalive module ?

2017-03-27 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hello, I submitted the 1st version of my prototype: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1045 I attach here 2 sample configurations to use with Regards, Guillaume Bour On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:18:47PM +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 13/0

Re: [SR-Users] new keepalive module ?

2017-03-13 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hi Daniel, Thanks for you answer On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:35:17PM +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 07/03/2017 21:22, Guillaume Bour wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to implement destinations keepalive in drouting module (as

[SR-Users] new keepalive module ?

2017-03-07 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hi all, I would like to implement destinations keepalive in drouting module (as it is done in dispatcher). But instead of duplicating what's implemented in dispatcher, I think it would be more clever to create a new module dedicated to pinging destinations, and to plug drouting, dispatcher and o

[SR-Users] new keepalive module ?

2017-03-07 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hi all, I would like to implement destinations keepalive in drouting module (as it is done in dispatcher). But instead of duplicating what's implemented in dispatcher, I think it would be more clever to create a new module dedicated to pinging destinations, and to plug drouting, dispatcher and o

Re: [SR-Users] Late parallel forking

2014-07-22 Thread Guillaume Bour
user might not notice anything in terms of > ringing interruption. > > Alternative is of course writing a function for it, at the end it is > on of the big benefits of open source. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 21/07/14 13:06, Guillaume Bour wrote: > >Hi, > >I would like to

[SR-Users] Late parallel forking

2014-07-21 Thread Guillaume Bour
Regards,

Re: [SR-Users] Memory leak in http_query() function (utils module)

2014-02-18 Thread Guillaume Bour
On 17/02/2014 20:34, Juha Heinanen wrote: Guillaume Bour writes: Can't you directly apply my patch on 4.0 branch ? i can if you send me all changes in one patch. -- juha Hi Juha, here it is Regards, Guillaume diff --git a/kamailio-4.0.5.1/modules/utils/functions.c b/kamailio-4.

Re: [SR-Users] Memory leak in http_query() function (utils module)

2014-02-17 Thread Guillaume Bour
On 15/02/2014 03:21, Juha Heinanen wrote: Guillaume Bour writes: I attached patches to fix those issues (applies to 4.0 branch) thanks for the patch. since it was for 4.0 i had to manually apply the changes to master and then i did cherry pick to 4.1. cherry pick to 4.0 failed. -- juha

[SR-Users] Memory leak in http_query() function (utils module)

2014-02-14 Thread Guillaume Bour
() is called *after* curl_easy_cleanup(), which must not be done (see http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/c/curl_easy_cleanup.html) I attached patches to fix those issues (applies to 4.0 branch) Regards, Guillaume Bour diff --git a/kamailio-4.0.5.1/modules/utils/functions.c b/kamailio-4.0.5.1/modules/utils

Re: [SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

2013-11-26 Thread Guillaume Bour
ranch. If you confirm they are working fine, then I will backport to git branch 4.0 as well. Hi Daniel, I have tested it on 4.0 branch, and its working fine Regards, Guillaume Cheers, Daniel On 11/21/13 5:19 PM, Guillaume Bour wrote: Hi Daniel No, replies are not dropped. I looked int

Re: [SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

2013-11-25 Thread Guillaume Bour
are working fine, then I will backport to git branch 4.0 as well. Hi Daniel, I have tested it on 4.0 branch, and its working fine Regards, Guillaume Cheers, Daniel On 11/21/13 5:19 PM, Guillaume Bour wrote: Hi Daniel No, replies are not dropped. I looked into source code, particularly

Re: [SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

2013-11-21 Thread Guillaume Bour
wrote: Hello, are you dropping replies? I don't see the 'SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated' being sent to caller, it looks ok and has two Via headers. Cheers, Daniel On 11/20/13 4:06 PM, Guillaume Bour wrote: On 20/11/2013 12:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 11

Re: [SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

2013-11-20 Thread Guillaume Bour
On 20/11/2013 12:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 11/20/13 11:50 AM, Guillaume Bour wrote: Hi All We wan't to prevent our users to make more than one call at time, so we choose to disconnect the previous call. When the previous call is established, we use dlg_bye(), and i

[SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

2013-11-20 Thread Guillaume Bour
Hi All We wan't to prevent our users to make more than one call at time, so we choose to disconnect the previous call. When the previous call is established, we use dlg_bye(), and its ok. But when it is in early state, we use t_cancel_callid() to cancel its INVITE transaction. We face 2 issu