Hey Guys
I need assistance for the following case:
I receive dialog_end request from external component in
evapi:message-received block and would like to somehow kill the dialog
corresponding to h_id and h_entry I get in the message. Is there any way to
do that without involving mi_*?
Any tip ap
Hey Daniel,
Thanks for clarifying it! Please keep me posted.
DanB
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Another one bites the dust ;).
My problem was strict vs loose routing done by loose_route function.
In order to loop through B2BUA I have defined the loopback interface's
IP as a local alias for simplicity in checking myself in routing
script.
When doing loose_route, the route address was for som
Hey Guys,
I have noticed some unexpected behavior (at least by me) during my tests.
When routing specific ACK message back to 200 OK originator, Kamailio
will rewrite the ruri with the value of route header. Is that known or
some memory access problem?
Call setup: B2BUA(127.0.0.1) -> Kamailio (1
ing pattern should be made
>> configurable, so it will work with normal uris for local service -- maybe it
>> will be added before next major release, let's see how the time allows it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 3/12/12 12:55 PM, Dan-Cristian Bog
All,
For the sake of archiving, this issue was solved.
The problem was not on Kamailio side but user one (I was only using
one domain on the XMPP side, without adding the sip part in the to
field of xmpp). After inserting it correctly, I have now presence as
well as txt messages passing through th
2012 at 1:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> to, from and type attributes are there, just that the uris are not the
> format expected. Can you send the log messages for debug=3?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dan-Cris
sy to
> find and fix the reason the parser in xmpp module fails to understand it.
>
> I guess pua_xmpp has to know the dialog for the mapping between the sip and
> xmpp sides.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos
> wrote:
>>
>&
Guys,
After my previous discovered issue (Kamailio not happy to talk with
Openfire for subscriptions), trying to find work arounds, thought
about using pua_mi to enforce subscriptions coming from XMPP side.
The following events happen:
* I subscribe over mi interface successfully.
* Presence se
; http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.openser.user/31713
>
>
> palo73
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-
>> boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Dan-Cristian Bogos
>> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 11:22 AM
&
Hey Guys,
I was wondering if anyone having experience with using xmpp module as
presence gateway between SIP and XMPP. I started evaluating it and
till now got some weird results, not sure if it is just my setup which
does not match the one widely used or the module is incomplete.
Regarding my se
Hey Daniel,
As said in the past, this module is good news, thanks for making it available.
As a big fan of delayed billing, sleep() does a great job of delaying
200 OK from the upstream for me (useful for example with analogue/CDMA
gateways sending 200 OK on ringback).
Cheers,
DanB
_
/13/11 2:10 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
>>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> I was recently playing with gateway-ing IPv4-IPv6 and hit the
>> following scenario:
>> * AOR having contacts on both ipv4 and ipv6 and I wanted to do
>> parallel forking.
>>
>> RT
Hey Guys,
I was recently playing with gateway-ing IPv4-IPv6 and hit the
following scenario:
* AOR having contacts on both ipv4 and ipv6 and I wanted to do
parallel forking.
RTPProxy bridging works without any issue on a normal setup, however
the problem shows up when needing to make calls toward
Daniel,
I will be there on Thursday/Friday.
Cheers.
DanB
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hey Daniel,
Many thanks for so fast answer. I think sleep() will still help me.
Will experiment it here.
Cheers,
DanB
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/14/10 6:33 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
>>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>
Hey Guys,
I came in need to delay 200 OK sent to originator, I know that is not
the job of a proxy (not a perfect world though), so if anyone think
that should be in theory at least possible with kamailio/sr, I would
appreciate any tip.
Scenario: User A -> Proxy -> User B.
User B will send 183 an
17 matches
Mail list logo
