Hello Daniel,
I notice that you still haven't solved the problem with the service
provider for asipto.com .
Still this domain (any website on it) is not reachable directly from
România.
I'm still hoping this will be solved.
Regards
Costin Radu
On 29.noiembrie.2011 10:44, Daniel-Constantin Mier
Daniel,
The problem is that the asipto domain does not seem to be reachable from
almost any romanian ISP . I could cite you a few names, but is
irrelevant, as I, and others have tried to reach that site from
different locations, and different providers.
The only solution was to use a web proxy (f
Hi Henrik,
There is a project called "The 3Gdb Home Subscriber Server (HSS)"
They can be found at http://code.google.com/p/hss/ .
"This application implements the HSS network element within an IP
Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Core Network (CN)."
I was looking into this project a while ago and seemed
Dear sirs and madams,
I was wondering what is the current support for DNS fallback in the
3.1.x branch .
Lets assume we have a new dialog started and the name in the To field
needs to be resolved via a NAPTR.
Kamailio sends a NAPTR request, gets 3 SRVs , each with a number of A or
records.
Th
Thank you, that was the solution.
However, both from GTS telecom and from RDS networks asipto is not
reacheable.
I do not know which is your policy towards this, but maybe a cooldown
time should be advisable.
Maybe your firewall is just too strict.
For me, the webproxy solution works.
Others may
Pe 28.03.2011 11:30, marius zbihlei a scris:
> On 03/28/2011 11:27 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> On 3/28/11 8:22 AM, CT Radu wrote:
>>
>>>
>> Maybe you are unlucky to connect from a network that was source of
>> scanning attacks, thus being
Pe 27.03.2011 12:34, Daniel-Constantin Mierla a scris:
> Hello,
>
> I thought it is an useful information to announce here that the SIP
> Communicator SIP softphone was renamed to Jitsi. There are several
> pages mentioning Kamailio and SIP Communicator out there, among them
> our participation to
Did any one had any problem with this?
I have a test setup where I have the following directives for dns caching:
use_dns_cache=yes#enabling DNS caching
dns_cache_del_nonexp=yes # deletes entries if the memory is
becoming full
dns_cache_flags=0
dns_cache_gc_interval
