5060 port.
On 13/08/2016 09:36, Asgaroth wrote:
I just looked at the pua table, and I dont have any records in the
table, so I presume this error message occurs when reading the
in-memory structure when pua module tries to update the database.
Is there a way I can see what the in memory
like?
On 12/08/2016 13:22, Asgaroth wrote:
Update:
I've just noticed that the error's I'm seeing roughly appear every 20
seconds after an attempted locall generated publish is sent when
rewriting the via header in the event-route.
This seems to corrolate with my db update
nd_proxy parameter is set? I presume,
then, the Via header would be generated correctly.
Any thoughts on how I could work around this issue?
Thanks
On 09/08/2016 09:31, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've just sent the captures on to you privately.
Thanks
On 09/08/2016 08:34, Daniel-C
18:51, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a configuration where we run a multi-homed proxy/loadbalancer
and a seperate internal presence server. We then use
pua/pua-dialoginfo on the proxies to publish dialog state to the
internal presence server.
The proxies listen on udp:external_ip:5062 and udp:interna
Hi All,
I have a configuration where we run a multi-homed proxy/loadbalancer and
a seperate internal presence server. We then use pua/pua-dialoginfo on
the proxies to publish dialog state to the internal presence server.
The proxies listen on udp:external_ip:5062 and udp:internal_ip1:5060.
T
llow up publish, just the effect on blf.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/10/15 13:24, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I've come accross an intermittent issue where an initial publish is
sent to our presence server, proxy recieves the subsequent 200 with
etag, but the following publish sent does not conta
Hi All,
I've come accross an intermittent issue where an initial publish is sent
to our presence server, proxy recieves the subsequent 200 with etag, but
the following publish sent does not contain the sip-if-match header of
the recieved 200, which ends up causing trouble with BLF on our test
(ds_setid)) );
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/10/15 14:35, Asgaroth wrote:
I originally sent this to sr-dev in error, I am resending to sr-users
instead, thanks
Hi All,
Quick question, is it possible to use variables in the setflag
function, I am trying to set a flag that is stored in a hash table
I originally sent this to sr-dev in error, I am resending to sr-users
instead, thanks
Hi All,
Quick question, is it possible to use variables in the setflag function,
I am trying to set a flag that is stored in a hash table using the
setflag function, but I keep getting syntax errors. I am us
I can confirm I am seeing the same issue, I'm not setting db_mode
parameter, but according to the docs it defaults to 0 (caching mode).
I'm running kamailio v4.3.3
Log:
Oct 9 11:06:27 kam_proxy01[20890]: ERROR: db_sqlite [dbase.c:489]:
db_sqlite_commit(): sqlite commit failed: constraint fail
x27;, 1443600900]
# kamctl domain show
domain:: domain1.example.com
did:: domain1.example.com
# kamctl domain reload
# kamctl domain show
domain:: domain1.example.com
did:: domain1.example.com
# kamctl domain showdb
[1, 'domain1.example.com', '', 1443435582]
[2,
in-memory
values, and reload says it completed, but dump shows nothing too:
kamcmd> permissions.addressDump
{
}
kamcmd> permissions.addressReload
Reload OK
kamcmd> permissions.addressDump
{
}
Am I missing something with my configuration, or have I come accross a bug?
Thanks for readin
Hi,
Friendly "bump", any thoughts on this one?
I'm using kamailio v4.3.2
Thanks
On 28/09/2015 13:11, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
I am busy testing the db_text module for some modules who's
configuration does not change that often.
If I set the db_mode for db_text to 0 (cachi
oh, i forgot to mention I'm on version kamailio v4.3.2
On 29/09/2015 12:55, Asgaroth wrote:
I ended up looking at the source for Kazoo, and there appears to be a
"pua_mode" parameter which defaults to 1, I added
modparam("kazoo", "pua_mode", 0)
And I am
documented in the Kazoo module docs.
Is this the correct way of disabling the presence db connection for the
kazoo module?
I am not a C developer by any stretch, so any tips would be appreciated.
Thanks
On 28/09/2015 13:20, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some tests with the kazoo module, I
Hi,
I am doing some tests with the kazoo module, I only want to use it for
some amqp related tasks.
In our particular case, we do not require kazoo to hook into the
presence tables, however, if I do *not* set the db_url parameter for
kazoo, then kamailio fails to start with the following err
Hi,
I am busy testing the db_text module for some modules who's
configuration does not change that often.
If I set the db_mode for db_text to 0 (caching), it appears that if I
modify the file directly (in this case the address dbtext file) and then
issue a "kamctl address reload" the updated
Hi all,
I have a quick question with regards the topoh module, is it possible to
have the topoh module only operate on a particular interface and direction.
I have some edge proxies and I am trying out the topoh module, what I
see happen is that messages originating from behind/inside the edg
doh, forgot the lines in the previous email:
modparam("siptrace", "hep_version", 2)
modparam("siptrace", "hep_mode_on", 1)
On 28/08/2015 14:24, Asgaroth wrote:
Just to confirm, commenting out the following two lines gets rid of
the parser errors, thanks
Just to confirm, commenting out the following two lines gets rid of the
parser errors, thanks for the pointer :)
On 28/08/2015 14:21, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for pointing that out (hep enabled), my module definitions are
as follows:
modparam("siptrace", &quo
/2015 14:17, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
are you mirroring the sip packets back to you? Because they might be HEP
and you need sipcapture module to handle that. Iirc, you can have the
mirroring node and sipcapture node on same kamailio instance.
Anyhow, you can look on the net at po
Hi,
I came across this issue yesterday, and it turned out that the
/var/run/kamailio directory did not exist, once I created it, kamailio
was able to create the fifo file.
Hope that helps.
On 28/08/2015 13:13, Sven Juhkam wrote:
After updating kamailio I get:
ERROR: Error opening Kamailio
Hi All,
I have a strange issue occuring, when I enable the siptrace
functionality within the routing logic, I begin to get a bunch of parser
error as show below. Is this normal behaviour or, more than likely, am I
doing something wrong?
I enable siptrace as follows:
request_route {
route(
by the local kamailio
instance.
I am running in memory mode only, I do not use the database for usrloc
entries, I keep the location "database" in memory only, and I sync the
database using the dmq_usrloc module, which works beautifully btw :)
Any tips/suggestions would be great
er.org] On Behalf Of Igor
Olhovskiy
Sent: Wednesday 12 August 2015 18:11
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] XCap Server + Postgre
Sure I have. But no field 'extension' in it
среда, 12 августа 2015 г. пользователь Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.co
Hi Igor,
I personally don’t use the xcap module, but looking at that error message, it
seems to me that Kamailio cannot find the subscriber table which it will use to
lookup the authentication details.
Are you sure you have your Kamailio database and Kamailio database related
settings setup
.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 23/07/15 15:19, Asgaroth wrote:
> some more info on this one, it looks like this is only happening on
> nodes that have been replicated to, for example,
>
> If a registration is processed on node 1, then the nathelper send the
> locally generated options message out
populating.
Kelvin Chua
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com
<mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com> > wrote:
Hi,
I’m a new user to the dmq subsystem in kamailio, but, once I had a properly
configured dmq environment and loaded dmq_usrloc after dmq, all I h
Hi,
I’m a new user to the dmq subsystem in kamailio, but, once I had a properly
configured dmq environment and loaded dmq_usrloc after dmq, all I had to do was
add the following to the module paramters:
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
Then in the routing logic of the registrar’s y
doing
record_route().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/07/15 17:04, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have kamailio setup and listening on logical interfaces (for
failover purposes) and therefore need to force the sending socket on
initial messages. We are testing sips+tls at the moment and what we
are trying to achive
Hi All,
I have kamailio setup and listening on logical interfaces (for failover
purposes) and therefore need to force the sending socket on initial
messages. We are testing sips+tls at the moment and what we are trying
to achive is that the TLS connection occurs from the UAC to the edge
proxy
eek when I have some time but in the
meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com
<mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples fo
FYI
I open issue #264 on github for this oddity I'm experiencing.
On 22/07/2015 11:41, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however,
I would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into
en it
comes to multiple registrar's with registration replication? Myabe I am
missing something here, any tips/tricks/suggestions/beatings most welcome
Thanks
On 23/07/2015 12:14, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a strange issue, I have set the module parameter for
nathelper's force_sock
Hi All,
I have a strange issue, I have set the module parameter for nathelper's
force_socket to a specfic ip/port, however, when I perform a sip trace I
can see that all locally generated options messages are not sent from
the socket defined in the modules parameters.
I am not setting $fs an
Have a look here and see if it helps you:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-October/075210.html
On 23/07/2015 07:48, Ali Taher wrote:
Any help regarding the below would be appreciated.
BR,
Ali
*From:* Ali Taher [mailto:ata...@vanrise.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1
t;)
*modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) *
modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 4)
Thanks
On 22/07/2015 15:49, Robert Boisvert wrote:
You might want to consider this function:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/dmq.html#dmq.p.multi_notify
On Wed,
e looking to achieve?
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 15:22, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com
<mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I have an issue with the dmq_is_from_node() function, whereby it
does not detect a node is on the bus if it has been removed from
.
id: f38e67
compiled on 18:15:23 Jul 20 2015 with gcc 4.4.7
Thanks
On 22/07/2015 15:22, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have an issue with the dmq_is_from_node() function, whereby it does
not detect a node is on the bus if it has been removed from its
"table" due to previously failed,
Hi All,
I have an issue with the dmq_is_from_node() function, whereby it does
not detect a node is on the bus if it has been removed from its "table"
due to previously failed, i presume, ping requests.
I have the following snippet in my main routing block:
if(is_method("KDMQ")) {
if
is not intended
behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the
meantime, you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com
<mailto:00asgarot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I
would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:11, Asgaroth
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I
would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth
: f38e67
compiled on 18:15:23 Jul 20 2015 with gcc 4.4.7
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same
AOR, I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and
I use the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When
.
id: f38e67
compiled on 18:15:23 Jul 20 2015 with gcc 4.4.7
On 21/07/2015 15:11, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where a device has successfully registered and its
location saved/stored in memory.
I can see all the stored information when I issue a "kamctl ul show"
How
Hi All,
I have a situation where a device has successfully registered and its
location saved/stored in memory.
I can see all the stored information when I issue a "kamctl ul show"
However, if I perform a kamctl ul show subscriber@domain, where the
'subscriber@domain' is copied/pasted from th
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR,
I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use
the 0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" node
Ahh, I see what I did wrong, my event-package was set to 'presence', it
should be 'message-summary'.
Now to figure out how to maint CRLF in XML...
On 10/07/2015 17:42, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I am having difficulty getting pua_publish to issue a NOTIFY when I
send
Hi All,
I am having difficulty getting pua_publish to issue a NOTIFY when I send
an XMLRPC command to generate a PUBLISH into the presence server.
I have been reading the pua_mi module docs, but I cannot see where I am
going wrong with the following xmlrpc command, please would someone
point
/commit/733fd5daf74963b152a2964f9eea1a6fff91858a.patch
On 07/07/2015 11:51, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I created issue report #236 for this bug just to keep track of it :)
Thanks
On 02/07/2015 08:02, Asgaroth wrote:
Thanks for the quick look Daniel.
If anyone requires any further info, dont
I've created a new issue #237 on github to track this issue :)
On 01/07/2015 20:48, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I am playing with the new dmq_replicate module and am banging my head
against an issue I have come accross. I can see the kamailio
registrars sending the replication messages t
Hi All,
I created issue report #236 for this bug just to keep track of it :)
Thanks
On 02/07/2015 08:02, Asgaroth wrote:
Thanks for the quick look Daniel.
If anyone requires any further info, dont hesitate to ask, I still
have the core file.
On 02/07/2015 07:33, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
send_reply("500", "No destination available");
exit;
}
}
}
On 07/07/2015 08:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
you need to re-arm the failure route inside the failure_route, before
relaying again. Failure routes are armed one time, when a fin
Hi All,
I would like to reduce the time it takes for kamailio to timeout an
initial message to a dispatcher destination so that it will select the
next destination in the set, before, hopefully, a restransmission. In
this case I am testing registration messages.
I came accross the t_set_fr()
for a while, but I guess some other devs that use dmq can
look at it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/07/15 23:33, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
Another thing I noticed while playing with kamailio and dmq/dmq_usrloc
is that 7 out of 10 times the kamailio process crashes when I
initially start it up.
Any tips
07:57, Charles Chance wrote:
Hello,
As with your other thread, I suspect dmq_usrloc is at fault here. I've
not looked at this module before, but can take a look over the next
day or so if no one else gets to it first.
Cheers,
On 1 Jul 2015 22:13, "Asgaroth" <00asgarot...@gmail
Hi All,
Another thing I noticed while playing with kamailio and dmq/dmq_usrloc
is that 7 out of 10 times the kamailio process crashes when I initially
start it up.
Any tips/requests for further debugging would be greatly appreciated.
Kamailio version:
version: kamailio 4.3.0 (x86_64/linux)
On 01/07/2015 21:30, Charles Chance wrote:
Hello,
Should be no need to load any additional deserializer. The docs simply
mean if you wish to send/receive your own messages from within a
module or script, it's up to you to choose the best payload type and
method of (de)serialization.
Can
;:64,"q":-1,"last_modified":1435779753,"methods":5087,"reg_id":0}
On 01/07/2015 21:30, Charles Chance wrote:
Hello,
Should be no need to load any additional deserializer. The docs simply
mean if you wish to send/receive your own messages from within a
mo
Hi All,
I am playing with the new dmq_replicate module and am banging my head
against an issue I have come accross. I can see the kamailio registrars
sending the replication messages to the other node(s) in the dmq bus,
and the payload looks to be of type json. However, on the recieving
nodes
I just noticed a typo, the contacts should look like this:
what I end up with:
[a] Contact:
what I am trying to achieve
[b] Contact:
*;received=sip:213.146.165.189:37891*
Thanks
On 15/01/2015 08:30, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the responses thus far, I would be interrested in
", "Moved Temporarily");
exit;
}
and end up with a contact header looking like below:
[a] Contact:
What I am trying to achieve is:
[a] Contact:
*;received=sip:213.146.165.189:37891*
Are these two versions of the contact header interpretted the same way?
Thanks
O
,
where is the media server located and the signaling flow for it?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09/01/15 14:41, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping to have the redirect server not be in the signalling path,
so when a media server asterisk/freeswitch sends an invite over to the
redirect server, I need to respond
when forwarding requests.
Can you give more details of how path and received from location should
be used by the one receiving the 30x redirect?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/01/15 22:09, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I am attempting to setup a standalone redirect server which will
lookup contact info and
Hi All,
I am attempting to setup a standalone redirect server which will lookup
contact info and redirect to appropriate outbound proxy.
The problem I am having is that the registrar is storing the path and
recieved information, however, when I perform a lookup and reply with
302, the reciev
pushed a new patch for
this case as well.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25/07/14 19:35, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
On 25/07/2014 13:49, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
The second one is with the patch to the code and it is enough to
pick only that one.
OK, I tried 4.1.4 with this patch applied and I still get the
Hi,
On 25/07/2014 13:49, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
The second one is with the patch to the code and it is enough to pick
only that one.
OK, I tried 4.1.4 with this patch applied and I still get the following
error message:
/usr/sbin/kamailio[22158]: ERROR: tm [tm.c:1618]: t_replicate_
On 25/07/2014 12:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I read the condition on uri wrong -- it was only on a null pointer for
the uri, not on length (in this case pointer is to a empty string). I
pushed an enhanced check for length as well, but it is only in master
for the moment.
ok, I will tr
On 25/07/2014 11:33, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
$ru = "sip:" + BACKUP_REGISTRAR_1 + ":5060";
append_branch("sip:" + BACKUP_REGISTRAR_2 + ":5060");
*t_replicate("");*
Yes, and this should work on existing versions 4.1.x or older
OK, trying to test this and I'm seeing an error with debug=2:
for building the
rpms:
kamailio-4.2.0-dev7_src.tar.gz
Is the patch living in this branch or can I do a 'git checkout -b 4.1
origin/4.1' and expect the patch to be in there?
Thanks
Bruce
On 25/07/2014 11:20, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
On 25/07/2014 11:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote
Hi,
On 25/07/2014 11:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I pushed a patch to master branch that allows to use t_replicate()
without any parameters.
Apparently the same behaviour can be achieved using:
t_replicate("")
so the parameter is an empty string. Can you try it and see if works?
Also
On 24/07/2014 17:26, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
checking docs, it seems like that. I will have to look at the code and
eventually make an option without parameter. Otherwise, like it is
not, the parameter forces an outbound proxy to be used for forwarding.
I guess that makes sense for set
,
ok, I will look it up and investigate when I get the first chance.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 22/07/14 16:43, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi,
On 22/07/2014 11:38, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
looking a bit at the source code, append branch should still create
a new destination point and message to be
Hi,
On 22/07/2014 11:38, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
looking a bit at the source code, append branch should still create a
new destination point and message to be sent there. I would need the
log messages printed with debug=3 in kamailio.cfg for the case when
you use append branch
Hi,
On 22/07/2014 09:13, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
first some clarifications about the subject:
- append_branch() adds a new destination for normal
forwarding/relaying -- replies from these destinations are forwarded
back to the initial sender
- t_replicate() creates a special branch --
I ended up using two 'forward' statements in stead of t_replicate as it
does not appear to work with 2+ servers to replicate to.
On 21/07/2014 15:01, Asgaroth wrote:
Further update, it looks like append_branch is over-writing the
original request-uri, an ngrep shows the following
ke the append_branch is
being added but its uri is set to BACKUP_REGISTRAR_3 (and not
BACKUP_REGISTRAR_2 as requested int the append_branch section)
On 21/07/2014 13:49, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
I have an issue that I cant seem to get to the bottom of, I would
appreciate if someone could point me in the
Hi All,
I have an issue that I cant seem to get to the bottom of, I would
appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction.
I have 3 registrar's and would like to replicate the registration regest
from 1 to the other 2, I am trying this with t_replicate, the docs say
that to send
Hi Charles,
dialog module does have support of in memory support and multiple
options for how it writes back into a database table (or disable
database altogether and just use memory). However, I suspect, this would
only be usefull again if a single loadbalancer is in use, as the second
loadbalanc
Hi All,
Just resending this as my previous message was too big (bigger than 60k)
---.
Thanks all for the suggestions.
@Charles
Yes that is correct, that is the scenario that is occurring, we are
using asterisk, when a call is initiated via asterisk 1, the second call
then routes through to aste
Hi All,
Currently we are running kamailio in a loadbalanced fashion whereby calls
come in via the loadbalancers and distribute calls accross 2 media servers.
We have come accross and issue whereby call transfers may be distributed
accross two media servers and when the REFER message comes along to
local_ip)
Or SER-style: @cfg_get.my project.local_ip
You can evaluate those in Lua, right?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Atlanta, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0671
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com
Asgaroth<00asgarot...@gmai
Hi All,
I am looking at writing a lua function that would really benefit from
accessing "variables" that I would have defined by using the #!define
statement. Is this at all possible? I've tried looking at the
documentation surrounding lua and kamailio, but I cannot see how I would
access it.
Hi Guru's,
I'd just like some advice on t_replace and its placement in the routing
script.
A lot of examples show the following setup:
save("location");
t_replicate("backup_server");
Would it not be wiser to have something like:
if (save("location")) {
t_replcate("backup_server");
}
Woul
Thanks Alex, I'll go and do some reading up on avp's :)
On 28/02/12 16:25, Alex Balashov wrote:
I would just throw a serialised string into the hash table as a scalar
entry, the components of which are separated by some delimiter, e.g.
REGISTER-1;INVITE-2;3
Then, I'd deserialise it by iter
I was looking to implement a hash table to select a particular
dispatcher destination set based on the sip request method. I was hoping
to achieve it by using an array in the hash table for a particular
domain. so for example have a htable as follows:
domain[0]:: REGISTER-1
domain[1]:: INVITE-
Hi All,
Is it possible to asertain the array index of an htable entry based on
its value?
For example, say I have an htable called foo with the following entries:
Entry:: 11
testing[0]:: hello-2
testing[1]:: 1
testing::size:: 2
is it possible to:
[a] extract the array index base
Hi
On 07/12/2011 14:02, Uri Shacked wrote:
> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)
Have you tried with ds_probing_mode = 2?
>From my understanding, when the probing mode is set to 2, only gateways
that are in "IP" state/mode will be tested.
___
> ok, thanks for testing!
>
No problemo, glad I could help in some way :)
> I'll do the backporting to 3.2 branch soon.
Thanks, appreciated :)
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Hi
On 03/11/2011 10:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> I discovered a copy&paste typo in previous commit for maintaining the
> inactive state, try again with latest GIT master and let me know the
> results.
>
That change works as expected now, thanks for all the work done to get
this going :
Hi
> can you fetch the latest master branch from git and try with:
Trying with the following version:
# ./kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.3.0-dev1 (i386/linux) 26364a
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP,
Hi
On 02/11/2011 10:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you fetch the latest master branch from git and try with:
>
> ds_probing_mode = 2
>
> This should keep inactive gateways in probing mode, if you set the
> probing mode when switching in trying/inactive state, until it gets
>
IZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 0b8f2e
compiled on 10:24:56 Oct 28 2011 with gcc 4.1.2
On 27/10/2011 17:49, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/27/11 5:30 PM, Asgaroth wrote:
>> Hi Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On 27/10/2011 15:57, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just pushed to remote GIT repository in master branch a bit of
> refactoring about the states and ds_mark_dst().
Thanks, I will test the dev branch in a short while and get back to you.
>
> Since with 3.2 seemed that
Hi Daniel,
On 26/10/2011 18:17, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> if you tried with 3.2.x, it was the case, since I just backported from
> master branch the commit I did to sort out better the behaviour based
> on probing state. Try again now with latest 3.2 branch.
>
Thanks, the changes you ma
On 26/10/2011 10:47, Asgaroth wrote:
>
> Assuming ds_probing_mode = 0 (Only send "ping" requests when
> destination is in probing state)
>
> IX (Inactive)
> [*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
> [*] No ping probes sent to destination
> IP (In
> Assuming ds_probing_mode = 0 (Only send "ping" requests when
> destination is in probing state)
>
> AP (Active-Probing)
> [*] Used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
> [*] Ping probes sent to destination
> [*] When reply to ping probe is recieved, state for gateway chages
> to AX (A
Hi Daniel,
On 26/10/2011 04:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i") and then right after ds_mark_dst("p"), a
>> log is printed saying that you cannot put a destination into probing
>> state when it is marked as inactive.
> are you sure you run the devel version? There is
Hi Daniel,
On 26/10/2011 04:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> the purpose with three states (active, inactive and disabled) was not
> to relate probing to selection of gateways, as one may want to have
> even active gateways in probing mode to detect when they go down. So,
> in other words, if
AX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 25bedc
compiled on 09:18:41 Oct 21 2011 with gcc 4.1.2
I hope I'm not going crazy here :/
Thanks
On 25/10/2011 16:52, Asgar
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
