Hi Joel,
On 21/09/16 00:37, Joel Serrano | VOZELIA wrote:
> I managed to solve this problem using ds_is_from_list in failure_route like
> this:
>
> ds_is_from_list("8201", "3", "sip:$T_rpl($si):$T_rpl($sp)"))
>
> But I don't understand why I needed to do it that way.
>
> I would still like anyone
This is the wrong mailing list, opensips != kamailio.
On 05/27/2016 10:47 AM, Varghese Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to setup WSS on opensips-2.2. I am getting "513 Message too
> big " when i am trying to make video calls. Audio calls and Registration
> is working fine.I tried to change t
Alex Balashov wrote:
> Strictly speaking, CANCEL is a different request, and accordingly, a
> different transaction.
>
> However, you should be able to access INVITE transaction data from the
> failure_route triggered in connection with transaction cancellation.
Thanks, Alex!
Andrew
_
Hi all,
it seems that the AVPs not available when when processing CANCEL
message, even though they have been set for this transaction initially.
Is this the expected behavior?
P.S. kamailio 4.3.4
Andrew
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER)
Per my understanding the uac module stores the "vsf" parameter in
Record-Route and should be able to update the From/To URIs automatically
in all in-dialog requests that carry this parameter.
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/uac.html#uac.p.restore_mode
“auto” - all sequential reques
Thanks Dmitri, I have to look closer at it, but for me it breaks
parallel forking, e.g. I need to reply only when it's the last branch.
Andrew
On 12/22/2015 05:46 PM, Dmitri Savolainen wrote:
> Andrew, I use smth like this for adding header to any response
>
> request_route{
>
> if (is_method("
Hello Efelin,
I stumbled upon the issue you described here. Have you been able to find
a solution? I've tried to play with t_reply(), but no luck so far.
Regards,
Andrew
On 11/18/2013 10:00 AM, Efelin Novak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to append a header to a 'winning' negative reply in
> failu
Hi,
I have a similar issue with kamailio 4.3.4. I want to append a header to
external 486 or 603 reply. If I got it right I should call append_hf,
not append_to_reply which is for locally generated replies.
I've added append_hf() and in the end of failure route call exit but for
some reason that h
Hi,
I was trying to use registered("location", "$ru", 0, 1)
Last parameter is the flag according to
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#registrar.f.registered
flag values is as follows:
1 - set xavp_rcd with value from matched contact
But I'm getting NULL instead of
Hi,
ideas anyone?
BR,
Andrew
On 06/17/2015 12:12 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> Daniel,
> I'm reviving this old thread..
>
> On 05/27/2015 01:40 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>> thanks for the answer, that's what I was thinking - maybe the flags do
>> not pers
Daniel,
I'm reviving this old thread..
On 05/27/2015 01:40 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> thanks for the answer, that's what I was thinking - maybe the flags do
> not persist or are destroyed after the per-branch failure route.
>
> However, the t_flush_flags description
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the answer, that's what I was thinking - maybe the flags do
not persist or are destroyed after the per-branch failure route.
However, the t_flush_flags description says this function can be used in
any route, so in should be fixed in the long term.. Let me check if I
can come
Hi Daniel and others,
I'm having a problem with acc module if I'm using the event_route/
branch-failure:
say, the call comes from the app server and goes to the registered user.
We arm the the failure route and per-branch failure route for the 302
redirect from the UA. We explicitly reset the accou
See http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.2.x/pseudovariables#tv_name
On 10/22/2014 10:40 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’m currently using the $TS psuedovariable to get the current unix
> timestamp, but this only returns the timestamp up to a second precision.
>
> Is it po
Hi,
we are filtering some method names from the Allow header with kamailio
4.1: depending in the configuration:
if (hf_value_exists("Allow", "INFO"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", "Remove INFO from Allow\n");
exclude_hf_value("Allow", "INFO");
}
if
Hi,
OK, thanks for the clarification. Maybe we will check the
load_db_contacts("userid") way with Victor.
Regards,
Andrew
On 09/15/2014 12:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/09/14 15:42, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>> Hi,
>> let's say I&#
Hi,
let's say I'm running two proxies/registrars that need to access Shared
location DB in db_mode=1 (all changes to usrloc are immediately
reflected in database too). I have observed that if the UAC re-registers
before the previous registration's expiry and the new REGISTER reaches
the other proxy
On 03/07/14 16:42, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
> thanks for fas reply. If I may user rtpengine as rtpproxy maybe you
> already use it or just know - does rtpengine provide ridge mode as
> rtpproxy between internal and external interfaces? At my instalne if I add
> rtpengine --ip=my.ext.net.addr/my.int
In the meantime it works if I access $T_rpl($ct) from per-branch failure
route.
Thanks.
On 02/20/2014 02:14 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> we do seem to have a problem here, the get_redirects() function can be
> used from the FAILURE_ROUTE only, not from per branch f
Daniel,
we do seem to have a problem here, the get_redirects() function can be
used from the FAILURE_ROUTE only, not from per branch failure route
("Command cannot be used in the block").
Does it mean that uac_redirect module needs an update?
Andrew
On 02/18/2014 10:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mier
Sorry for reviving this old thread. I think I've come across the same
issue as Jayesh and it is triggered by the Route
inserted by sipml5 into in-dialog requests like ACK - Route:
Jayesh had two Route headers that belong to this kamailio instance and I
also have two of them:
Route:
Route:
Alth
On 02/05/2014 11:20 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> Off to figure out why uac_test incorrectly flags the onhold process as
> needing
> the nat helper...
Well, nat_uac_test is pretty straightforward, it does what the flags
tell it to do:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/nathelper.html#id
Hi,
See presence_reginfo - Extension to Presence server for registration
info replication (RFC3680)
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/presence_reginfo.html
On 02/05/2014 07:56 AM, Premchandiran wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> May I know whether kamailio supports event header with reg (EVENT:r
Hi,
could you please post also your Chrome js developer log?
Does the problem exist if you start the jssip clients without video support?
Andrew
On 02/03/2014 12:00 PM, Mihai Marin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another weekend struggling to make a call from jssip to another jssip
> behind firewall and I s
On 01/23/2014 05:12 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> It is necessary to use the cwie / cwei flags in the rtpproxy_manage call?
>
> If rtpproxy uses only a single listen-IP, then these flags are not
> needed. Only if you operate rtpproxy in bridge mode, then you need these
> flags. Bridge mode is neces
Hi,
check if this answers your question: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:index
Andrew
On 01/13/2014 04:19 PM, Kasinath wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just installed Kamailio in one server and Asterisk in another.
> Asterisk loads it sipusers info from database which is in Kamailio server.
>
> I don't kno
Hi,
You should create a branch_route and perform this manipulation there..
BR,
Andrew
On 01/14/2014 10:53 AM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> No one has an idea? I was thinking that each request goes to RELAY but
> even if I try to modify the R-URI in this route, it fails. I still h
Hi,
On 10/11/2013 08:14 PM, Fred Posner wrote:
>> I use "rwie" and "rwei" flags but in ngcp-mediaproxy-ng e and i
>> seems to be used for IPv4 / IPv6 ..
>> ...
>
> I don't believe that mediaproxy-ng can be used to bridge two ipv4
> networks; only bridging for ipv6 <-> ipv4.
That's true, ther
Dear 2.8 users,
this update includes the fixes for kamailio-lb config (multiple
sockets-related):
- added record-route param to store socket; review logic for relaying
in-dialog requests (fallback to default send socket if it's not defined
explicitly); fixed socket selection for ACK after 4xx and r
Hi,
please check the link
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/auth.html - the Table of
Contents is missing, there's only examples list.
Andrew
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-rou
On 04/09/2013 11:59 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> because path-value starts with name-addr and my interpretation is that
> since there are <>s around this path header body:
>
> Path:
>
>
> solely consists of name-addr and does not include any rr-params. sip
> uri included in name-addr in turn can
Hi Juha,
On 04/07/2013 01:51 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> i escaped them, but it didn't help. path header now looks like:
>
> Path:
> .
>
> and i still get the same error:
>
> Apr 7 14:49:47 wheezy1 /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[8709]: ERROR: registrar
> [save.c:887]: Failed to parse Path: URI
I don't
Hello,
Usually this happens when the RURI has the IP address/ domain which
points to this server or which is present in the domain table. There are
some clients which may put even server IP address into Contact of INVITE
or 200 OK instead of its own so the further requests will be mis-routed.
You s
Carsten,
On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Carsten Maass wrote:
> Or does it mean, the authentication is rejected because the local part
> 030123456789 in URI does not match the subscriber 979?
Indeed, this is what happens when you call auth_check with flag "1":
if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "1"))
=auth_challenge
On 01/29/2013 05:25 PM, Carsten Maass wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> thanks for coming back to me.
>
> On 29.01.2013 13:40, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>> I see no problem with an ACK in the trace. The t38modem ACK's the
>> 407, sends the new INVITE
Hello,
I see no problem with an ACK in the trace. The t38modem ACK's the 407,
sends the new INVITE with authorization but it's not accepted by
kamailio. I'm not sure if t38modem can even perform the authorization.
Maybe you need to accept the calls from it without authorization. But if
it can and y
Hello,
try printing the $ru with xlog statement when the request comes into the
server and in the beginning of route[LCR].
On 11/01/2013 01:50, Douglas Ugalde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im trying to configure LCR in Kamailio 3.3.3 but I dont Know how can I
> do to fix this error:
>
> ERROR: lcr [lcr_mod.
On 01/07/2013 01:29 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> What I don't understand is why kamailio sets RURI of the OPTIONS message
> to value of "received" instead of the contact. I suspect a bug in the
> parser somewhere along these lines:
>
>> > r
Some Fritzbox devices don't accept the OPTIONS ping generated by
kamailio with RURI: sip:11.22.3.4:5060. In the location table we have:
received: sip:11.22.3.4:5060
contact: sip:user@11.22.3.4:5060;uniq=6633BC1386F4D4CC4EBD64DC7E967
path:
Kamailio version is 3.3.2 and the nathelper config is noth
Hello,
I'm getting some errors - if I restart kamailio on a live system, the
first call after restart fails with "max nr of branches exceeded".
However, we are not doing append_branch() or anything fancy for that
call at all:
Jan 3 15:26:54 sp1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[8078]: ERROR:
[dset.c:306]: max
Richard,
well, the RURI of remote ACK has proxy IP address 10.200.70.100 so proxy
thinks that previous hop was a strict router. I can't think of any
workaround that would not be an ugly hack at the moment, though.
On 11/23/2012 03:24 AM, Richard Brady wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a multihomed Kam
e notifier_processes
> modparam to 0. But, if you do this you should consider not using
> subs_db_mode 3 as there are many race-hazards in presence that are fixed
> by using the notifier_processes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 12:01 +0100, Andrew Pogre
Hi,
when presence module is running with subs_db_mode=3 it makes an
excessive number of SQL select queries, litelly dozens per second:
> 25232 Query select
> presentity_uri,callid,to_tag,from_tag,event from active_watchers where
> updated=64 AND event<>'presence.winfo'
>
Kamal,
perhaps RFC 5763 provides you some of the answers?
On 10/16/2012 11:06 AM, Kamal Palei wrote:
> Hi Johansson, All
> Sincier regards and thanks for input.
>
> As I understand, all media packets pass through RTP Proxy. The RTP
> Proxy will receive simple UDP media packets from endpoints.
17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you can try after you set the flag you wanted to be in transaction, to
> be sure it gets there.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 9/26/12 7:43 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> No, I don't. T
_flags()?
>
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules_k/tmx.html#id2543767
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 9/26/12 3:30 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have found recently that in order to detect retransmits I have to
>> create a transacti
Hi,
I have found recently that in order to detect retransmits I have to
create a transaction explicitly when the request comes in:
force_rport();
if(!t_check_trans())
t_newtran();
sl_send_reply("100", "Trying");
xlog("L_INFO", "New request - $ci\n");
On 09/18/2012 04:58 PM, Nathaniel L Keeling III wrote:
> 11(28548) DEBUG: db_postgres [km_dbase.c:393]: PQclear(1008b8560) result
> set
> 11(28548) DEBUG: auth_db [authorize.c:124]: HA1 string calculated:
> e13d569284e76a33ca63e4d6203f844a
> 11(28548) DEBUG: auth [api.c:211]: check_response: Our re
On 09/18/2012 12:15 PM, Gary Shergill wrote:
> Note that I am testing this with one computer connected by Bria and
> another computer connected via Blink. I am able to log on to a user on
> each (test1 and test2) and they are able to call each other. The issue
> is, with presence enabled, they are
Hello Spencer,
actually double quotes are not allowed in URI parameter. In the BNF
grammar the allowed chars in the "unreserved" definition are "alphanum"
and "mark", where "mark" is only "-" / "_" / "." / "!" / "~"
/ "*" / "'" / "(" / ")" ).
This is already fixed in 3.3.0 if I am not mistaken, p
You might need to upgrade to 3.3.1 to use sdpops module:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/sdpops.html
On 08/13/2012 09:52 AM, phillman25 wrote:
> Dear List
>
> I am trying to remove specific lines from the following original SDP body:
>
>
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content
Same here, also you can use protoshoot provided by kamailio, see
utils/protoshoot.
On 08/13/2012 07:45 AM, Mark Anthony Delfin wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> Previously I used the following.
>
> sipsak
> http://sipsak.org/
>
> or
>
> sipp
> http://sipp.sourceforge.net/
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
__
Mino, I am not sure, but you could try the following:
set failure_reply_mode 3
(http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#failure_reply_mode),
then handle 302 redirect in the proxy and use the contact as a new
branch like this:
if(status == "302")
{
$var(contact) = $ct;
At least some links at http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ don't work at the
moment:
Install Kamailio v3.3.x From GIT
Upgrade Kamailio v3.1.x to v3.2.0
Upgrade Kamailio v3.2.x to v3.3.0
you are redirected to some instruction from DokuWiki Installer when
trying to visit them. Could somebody
Hi Gary,
It was fixed already by Richard in 3.3 branch:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=28be16549831df46dd1b8312da223b02359d8a9c
(and master)
Thank you for the report.
On 07/24/2012 09:44 PM, Gary Chen wrote:
> Sorry, it should be Kamailio 3.3.0 not 3.2.0.
>
Hi Gary,
Yes, that's an old/known issue. You can convert the IP to common format
with a simple command:
perl -MSocket -le 'print inet_ntoa(pack("N", 1273060816))'
Maybe somebody from the kamailio team will take time to fix this.
On 07/24/2012 09:39 PM, Gary Chen wrote:
> Kamailio 3.2.0
>
>
>
>
On 06/19/2012 02:06 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> I am testing kamailio replies when an INVITE or another request arrives
> with lets say, "VIA" header missing
> The core drops the request. But, there is no reply for the originator
> (so it keep on resending the request...)
> Why?
If there was no V
The papers talk about transport protocol for signaling, not media/RTP.
I didn't hear of anyone who does RTP over TCP neither. I doubt even that
the performance is a primary reason behind that, for media over TCP the
client link must be virtually packet-loss free (due to TCP
retransmissions), while
Hi,
On 05/30/2012 12:22 PM, Aft nix wrote:
> So i'm interested if RFC 3261 provides any mechanism by which we can
> differentiate a BYE whether its from "caller" or "callee".
Check out is_direction() function:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/modules_k/rr.html#id2527009
___
Konstantin,
You should put the include_file directive after loadmodule and modparam
directives. So it can be either before main route block or at the bottom
of your main kamailio.cfg.
On 05/09/2012 06:48 PM, Konstantin M. wrote:
> After including a part of main config to included file -- I got a
Hello,
It is already there, see
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.1.x
On 05/09/2012 06:04 PM, Konstantin M. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like (and a many people here I believe) to have a functional of
> including a multiple config files like (foe example asterisk's
> #include
Hi Daniel,
See RFC 3261 section 12.2.2:
If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number
of the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request
is out of order and MUST be rejected with a 500 (Server Internal
Error) response.
However, 400 or some 4xx
Hi,
despite my initial doubt it works well :-) Thank you Daniel.
On 04/04/2012 05:51 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is record_route() executed as well as add_rr_param() for reinvites?
> Cannot spot in the logs. You can load debugger module and enable
> cfgtrace to see what actio
I've been pondering an issue with Route header parameters being not
mirrored by kamailio proxy into Record-Route field on in-dialog requests
over the last few hours so I thought I'd just whether I'm missing
something obvious.
The call scenario in UA -> lb -> proxy -> sems. Everything is fine with
Dan,
Well, it looks like kamailio recognizes 127.0.0.1 as its own URI that's
why it does rewrite. Do you have by chance such alias in your config (or
auto_aliases=yes)?
On 03/26/2012 03:47 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have noticed some unexpected behavior (at least by me) durin
Hello Klaus,
please check this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu/msg10537.html
On 03/14/2012 05:11 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> I wonder if a presence server may send a NOTIFY if the previous NOTIFY
> in the dialog did not received an answer yet. I "grep"ed
On 03/07/2012 08:46 PM, Lucas Alvarez wrote:.
> Something like this:
>
> if(($rU=~"^(box02)[0-9]{2,15}$")) {
> $rU = $(rU{s.substr,5,0});
> $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.box02.gw_ip) + ":"
> + $sel(cfg_get.box02.gw_port);
> }
BTW alternatively you can use dia
On 03/07/2012 07:37 PM, Lucas Alvarez wrote:
> I want rewrite $tU but I'm not being able, I'm doing the following:
>
> remove_hf("To");
> insert_hf("To: sip:$rU@$rd\r\n", "From");
>
> Then I'm printing $tU and it is still having the previous value, any
> help will be appreciated.
> Thanks in
Since Timo is most likely busy these days I will create an issue in the
tracker for that.
On 02/22/2012 08:48 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated
> with state=4.
> The kamailio version is 3.1.5, I'm
Hi,
I noticed dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated
with state=4.
The kamailio version is 3.1.5, I'm aware of certain limitations of
dialog module in this version (must use stateless replies, create dialog
after 407), but this is something rather new.
In kamailio config I'm
On 02/21/2012 12:38 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> The BYE follows the loose routing path, proxy gets 481 from the sbc and
> forwards that response back to PSTN gw, which somehow breaks it. AFAICS
> it's not specified in RFC what should the behavior look like when
> getting bot
Hello,
we have a Kamailio proxy which gets the call from PSTN gw and does some
call forwarding (serial forking) to several destinations through our sbc
The call flow I am looking at is:
- Kamailio sends INVITE to branch_1.
- branch_1 sends 180 with to-tag*, proxy relays it to the gw
* 180 meets t
Hi Daniel,
On 02/17/2012 10:47 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> I made a patch for server reconnect -- I had no access to a computer
> with redis lib installed for the moment, hopefully it compiles. If you
> can try and tell the result, it would be great, I can commit then.
I may be able to
Hi,
Was reading through the xmlrpc docs, could anybody with an access check
why Figure "RPC Example" is missing from
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/xmlrpc.html#fig.rpc_example
as well as 3.1 and 3.2 module docs?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
SIP Exp
On 02/01/2012 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> I was getting an error for some reason:
>>
>> 0(7860) ERROR: [pvapi.c:516]: error searching pvar "T_rpl"
>> 0(7860) ERROR: [pvapi.c:720]: wrong char [$/36] in [$T_rpl($ct)]
>> at [7 (5)]
>>
>> version: kamailio 3.1.5
> do you have tmx
Since this thread will probably end up in Google I''ll share my
experience. I ended up with this"
if(t_check_status("301|302"))
{
#NOTE: must assign to $du to keep R-URI intact
$var(contact) = $T_rpl($ct);
$var(contact) = $(var(contac
On 01/26/2012 08:21 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> Is there a configuration option to let kamailio use Public IP when
> setting record-route in 200 OK?
Of course, you need record_route_preset() - see
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/rr.html#id2667590
Also I would expect you need to
On 01/25/2012 03:18 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Put the 302 Contact URI in the destination set instead, i.e. $du, not
> $ru. That will cause it to be relayed to the redirect destination on
> the network and transport level, but the logical target will remain the
> same.
Ok. I was thinking that uac
Daniel, thank you - method (2) works like a charm.
On 01/25/2012 03:16 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> an option - get the contact header from 302 in failure route via
> $T_rpl($ct). Use its uri to set $du.
I was getting an error for some reason:
0(7860) ERROR: [pvapi.c:516]: error searc
Hello,
assuming that I want to use contact from 302 response as outbound proxy
but keep the original Request-URI, what should I do? Calling the
revert_uri() after get_redirects() in failure_route doesn't do the trick.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kam
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 03:41 PM, Reda Aouad wrote:
> I suggest that the function record_route( ) takes a public IP address as
> a parameter, still doing what it does (correct record routing and cookie
> addition did=xxx and loose route lr=on), but only replacing the private
> IP address on which Kamail
Javi,
ndb_redis does not reconnect if the server closes connection on timeout.
It should work if you set timeout to zero in server config. I thought
that I created a ticket in the bugtracker for that before, but not sure,
I can't find it right now.
On 13.01.2012 08:00, Javier Gallart wrote:
On 12/29/2011 03:36 PM, Robert R wrote:
> Thank a lot. $T_reply_code works.
> I tried all variables in pv doc ($rc, $err.rcode, $rs ... ) and none of
> them works,
Actually the $rs pseudo-variable should also work as described here:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/pseudo-variables/devel#sip_r
On 12/29/2011 03:21 PM, Robert R wrote:
> What is the Pseudo-variables for "Status-Line" filed of SIP response
> messages (2xx, 3xx,4xx,5xx,6xx)? i.e., is there a Pseudo-variables to
> display the SIP response code?
You can test it with tm function t_check_status(...) or get it in a
config variabl
On 12/23/2011 08:18 PM, Stefan Sayer wrote:
> shouldn't the db layer and driver be smart enough to do insert ... on
> duplicate key update at least where it's supported?
my fear is that such "first insert then update" policy will affect the
performance. can create noise in the log on some db backe
Gnani,
since version 3.2.0 kamailio accepts several arguments to
record_route_preset() function:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/modules_k/rr.html#id2542169
In 3.1.0 you can call insert_hf directly, but IMO it's worth upgrading.
Andrew
On 12/08/2011 08:50 PM, Gnaneshwar Gatla wrote:
> H
Bruno,
the address from contact header is put into R-URI on outgoing request to
that user. This is where I catch that parameter. I think we should debug
why kamailio sends the request using UDP, it is not clear, as Daniel
pointed out it should work automatically. I think I had to do these
manipulat
Hi Bruno,
What I have done is an explicit check
if (uri_param("transport","tls") || uri_param("transport","TLS"))
to call force_send_socket with either udp or tls port.
It would be cool for kamailio to select the proper socket automatically,
I think there was a discussion on that previously but I c
Austin,
the block beginning with dlg_manage() should be placed between
route(AUTH) and route(PSTN). It is commented out and put outside the
main routing block so I'm not sure if that was the case..
If the problem persists please get the dialogs list before calling,
while the callee's phone is ring
Austin,
Actually you could share your config to the mailing list, I will tell
you if there is something blatantly wrong ;-)
Regards,
Andrew
On 11/03/2011 06:15 AM, Jason Penton wrote:
> Hi Austin,
>
> Have a look at the TM module docs. You will find the appropriate
> commands there.
>
> HTH
>
Austin,
That is strange, because I am using similar setup successfully. Actually
I don't know if it counts the calls that are being established, I didn't
care for it.
While looking through the docs:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/dialog.html#id2524304
the following note caught m
On 10/30/2011 06:00 AM, Austin Einter wrote:
> When I run kamailio, I get below error.
>
> 0(4925) CRITICAL: dialog [dialog.c:297]: profile not definited
> [...]
> Any idea why this error comes and how to fix it.
You should really define profile caller by putting it into
profiles_with_value mo
Jeff,
On 10/03/2011 08:45 PM, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> I am trying to get kamailio sip-capture up and running for use with homer. I
> can get the service to start but i receive the following error.
>
> [root@homer kamailio]# /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -c
> loading modules under
> /usr/local/lib/kamai
On 09/26/2011 02:16 PM, Mino Haluz wrote:
Ok, the problem is the original feeradius package (squeeze) does not
support Update radius messages (it gives Unsupported Acct-Status-Type =
15).
It's not related to kamailio.
.. however anybody knows how to patch it?
The patches are here:
http://downl
On 09/02/2011 10:33 PM, David Zambrano wrote:
Hi andrew. Thanks for your help. What module or config should I use to
make sure the connection goes back through the loadbalancer?
That's simply the task for record-route like:
if (is_method("INVITE"))
record_route();
But you also need th
On 09/02/2011 08:58 PM, David Zambrano wrote:
After doing some traces
on the network I realized that the transcoder is trying to reach the
router in front of the softphone and skipping the Kamailio
loadbalancer. The call never reaches the softphone so the phonecall
never completes. In UDP exactly
ed t_reset_fr() before
the call to t_set_fr(), still no luck.
--
Sincerely,
Andrew Pogrebennyk
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
ater 300 seconds, no luck..
--
Sincerely,
Andrew Pogrebennyk
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
00)
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 12)
modparam("tm", "restart_fr_on_each_reply", 1)
The rest of config is really simple, I can upload it somewhere if it's
necessary.
--
Sincerely,
Andrew Pogrebennyk
___
SIP Ex
ll to t_relay():
# Replace from if needed
if(is_avp_set("$avp(s:allowed_cli)")) {
uac_replace_from("","$avp(s:allowed_cli)");
xlog("L_INFO", "$ci : replaced from to $avp(s:allowed_cli)\n");
}
--
Sincerely,
Andrew Pogrebennyk
___
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
