Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-06 Thread DanB
Hey Daniel, Many thanks again for premium support as always ;). Will get back to them since I understand Kamailio is RFC compatible on this one. Have a good one! DanB ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-us

Re: [SR-Users] Fw: kamcli doesn't function

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Another patch was pushed to kamcli to fix the access rights for use of unix domain sockets. Testing and reporting if works would be appreciated in order to close this issue. Cheers, Daniel On 06.04.17 11:39, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > I just tested with udp sockets and after fixing som

Re: [SR-Users] Fw: kamcli doesn't function

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I just tested with udp sockets and after fixing some small bits, seems to work. You have to fetch the latest kamcli from gihub.com/kamailio/kamcli Next I will check with unixsocket files, it seems to be some access rights issues. Cheers, Daniel On 06.04.17 11:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.0 doesn't forward Authorization (Digest username) to Asterisk

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I am not sure I got the proper picture of what do you want to achieve. Do you want to authenticate the registration twice, once by kamailio and second by asterisk? Cheers, Daniel On 03.04.17 01:05, Marko Tirs wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying to use Kamailio 5.0 with Asterisk (separate

Re: [SR-Users] Fw: kamcli doesn't function

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I will look at kamcli with unixsockets. Can you try by using UDP sockets? You need to change also the kamailio.cfg parameter for jsonrpcs socket. Should be bound to loopback for security, like udp:127.0.0.1:9062 for kamailio and udp:127.0.0.1:9064 for kamcli. Cheers, Daniel On 27.03.17

Re: [SR-Users] RPCFIFOPATH / DEFINE_FIFO_NAME settings problem

2017-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, thanks for testing and reporting back! It happens that I manage packaging of the rpms, but I actually don't use RPM-based operating systems, so it is more like 'blind' packaging. If anyone wants to jump on board and help maintaining/improving RPM packaging, he is more than welcome -- every