[SR-Users] Call forking with delay

2016-08-18 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
Hello list, I have a proxy that manage fix calls and a proxy that manage mobile calls. I want to implement call forking so when I call to a fix phone the call goes to the fix proxy and it forks to the mobile proxy who manage the call and viceversa. I want the fix to ring 2 or 3 times before the mo

Re: [SR-Users] Running both 4.3 and 4.4 with the same database with permission module

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Alex Hermann wrote: > > I want to upgrade my cluster from 4.3 to 4.4, beginning with the spare > > for live testing. But since there is a change to the trusted table > > (which we don't use, only address) this isn't possible without some > > tricks. There i

[SR-Users] detect failed socket

2016-08-18 Thread Péter Barabás
Hello, I want to refine the instant message handling in our application. It works really fine in most cases. I use the msilo module to store offline messages if the user is not registered with sending PUSH notification. But, there is a situation when I have problems: When I send a message to a u

Re: [SR-Users] Running both 4.3 and 4.4 with the same database with permission module

2016-08-18 Thread Alex Hermann
On donderdag 18 augustus 2016 12:29:25 CEST Daniel Tryba wrote: > I want to upgrade my cluster from 4.3 to 4.4, beginning with the spare > for live testing. But since there is a change to the trusted table > (which we don't use, only address) this isn't possible without some > tricks. There is no o

[SR-Users] Running both 4.3 and 4.4 with the same database with permission module

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Tryba
I want to upgrade my cluster from 4.3 to 4.4, beginning with the spare for live testing. But since there is a change to the trusted table (which we don't use, only address) this isn't possible without some tricks. There is no override for skipping the version check on any permissions table. I need

[SR-Users] Howto timeout INVITEs over TCP to something < 30s?

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Tryba
If an enduser INVITEted over TCP t_set_fr(t) with t < 30s have no effect, the INVITE will always timeout after 30s. What is controlling this 30s? The only default at 30s is the fr_timer, which should have no part in the timeout between an 1xx and a final answer for an INVITE.

Re: [SR-Users] To/From tags in uac_req()

2016-08-18 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Hello Daniel, How to track with dialog the call initiated by Kamailio ? Simple dlg_manage(), after uac_req_send()? Thank you, Julia. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > an alternative is to track the call with dialog module and t

Re: [SR-Users] To/From tags in uac_req()

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, an alternative is to track the call with dialog module and then trigger the end of the dialog via config or mi/rpc: - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog.html#idp47915332 - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog.html#idp47967692 Cheers, Da

Re: [SR-Users] To/From tags in uac_req()

2016-08-18 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Thank you Alex! I'll try it. Best regards, Julia On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi Julia, > > The only attributes that can be set on a request formed with uac_req() are > listed here: > > http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.4.x/pseudovariables#uac_req_key > > Tags

Re: [SR-Users] To/From tags in uac_req()

2016-08-18 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi Julia, The only attributes that can be set on a request formed with uac_req() are listed here: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.4.x/pseudovariables#uac_req_key Tags are not among them. However, it might be possible to generate a completely synthetic SIP message yourself using an

[SR-Users] To/From tags in uac_req()

2016-08-18 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Hello, Is it possible to set To/From tags in uac_req() ? We want to implement service like "color ring back tone". *Kamailio uac* *Asterisk* INVITE SDP --> <-200 SDP-- -BY

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-18 Thread Alex Balashov
On 08/18/2016 03:02 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: This is when the sip message was sent from a.b.c.d and the Via header has x.y.z.w. if you get a pcap with the request, we can check and see if the test is true for it. In Noah's case, this posed an issue because the request was being rec

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 17/08/16 20:26, Noah Mehl wrote: > I discussed this with Alex Balashov off-line, and he answered my > questions: > >> >> 1. A flag of 3, I don’t understand. I read the documentation >> >> , >> an