Re: [SR-Users] CDP Error S-CSCF Kamailio

2016-08-10 Thread Jason Penton
Hi Rodrigo, There should be done logging before those lines. Could you please enable debug and send the log file On 11 Aug 2016 2:52 AM, "Rodrigo Moreira" wrote: > Hello Carsten Bock, > > I got to advance in the event REGISTER, but now face the following > problem: > > When I type the command:

[SR-Users] CDP Error S-CSCF Kamailio

2016-08-10 Thread Rodrigo Moreira
Hello Carsten Bock, I got to advance in the event REGISTER, but now face the following problem: When I type the command: */etc/init.d/kamailio restart* Aug 10 20:40:52 scscf /usr/sbin/kamailio[2639]: INFO: cdp [diameter_peer.c:428]: diameter_peer_destroy(): destroy_diameter_peer(): Terminating a

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio presence

2016-08-10 Thread Bill
Thanks, Daniel. Now I am left with my basic problem: I cannot get notify messages to flow to the watcher phone. I get PUBLISH packets from the watched phone (1020129), like this: PUBLISH sip:1020...@xxx.xxxr.net:5020;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx9:1026;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-c08

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio presence

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 09/08/16 17:57, Bill wrote: > Daniel: > > Never Mind. Found the source of this problem. Had presence set to > modparam("presence", "subs_db_mode", 3). Changed it back to 2 and now > the entries persist in the db. > However, I am still getting the Could not find subs_dialogerror. That's not rea

Re: [SR-Users] Problem receiving large payloads from JSONRPC-S

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/08/16 09:04, Alex Balashov wrote: > Huh. You're right, it's not! :-) > > What value should I set it to for a 0.5 MB - 1 MB payload? Try larger than what you expect. You may need to adjust tcp_wq_max if you have many parallel large responses. Cheers, Daniel > > On August 10, 2016 3:03:

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel Grotti
Hey, are you using uac_replace_from() in your uplink leg (INVITEs) or are you changing $fu directly ? I think using uac_replace_from() and then using: modparam("uac","restore_mode","auto") should do the trick. Daniel rt Vienna, ATU64002206 On 08/10/2016 02:35 PM, Laura wrote: Ciao Dani

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

2016-08-10 Thread Laura
Ciao Daniel, here the data you request.. Of course Kamailio2 use the color 9990 to send the call to CISCO Gw because its a required.. so CISCO send back the call with 9990 to Kamailio2 and it to Kamailio1 and after that to Customer.. What I espect was that CISCO replied 9990 to Kamailio2, Kama2

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel Grotti
Ciao Laura, would be interesting to see the INVITE from kamailo2-->Cisco and see the headers there, as well as the 180/200 from Cisco->kamailio2. As Carsten said, probably Cisco is messing up From/To headers. The 9990 color is not present in any of the INVITEs you provided, so would be nice to

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

2016-08-10 Thread Laura
Sorry for delay on my reply.. I need to expalin better the situazione.. Customer1 Ip : 1.1.1.1 Kamailio1 ip : 2.2.2.2 Kamailio2 ip: 3.3.3.3 CiscoGW ip: 4.4.4.4 Kamailio1 is on USA for example Kamailio2 is on Germany for example Customer1 --> Kamailio platform1 --> Kamailio Platform2 --> CISCO

Re: [SR-Users] Problem receiving large payloads from JSONRPC-S

2016-08-10 Thread Alex Balashov
Huh. You're right, it's not! :-) What value should I set it to for a 0.5 MB - 1 MB payload? On August 10, 2016 3:03:32 AM EDT, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > >On 10/08/16 09:01, Alex Balashov wrote: >> I have indeed - it was in my original post: >> >> tcp_wq_max=20971520 >But this is no

Re: [SR-Users] Problem receiving large payloads from JSONRPC-S

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/08/16 09:01, Alex Balashov wrote: > I have indeed - it was in my original post: > > tcp_wq_max=20971520 But this is not tcp_conn_wq_max Cheers, Daniel > > > On August 10, 2016 3:00:22 AM EDT, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > wrote: >> Have you set the parameter: >> >> https://www.kamailio.or

Re: [SR-Users] Problem receiving large payloads from JSONRPC-S

2016-08-10 Thread Alex Balashov
I have indeed - it was in my original post: tcp_wq_max=20971520 On August 10, 2016 3:00:22 AM EDT, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >Have you set the parameter: > >https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#tcp_conn_wq_max > >Cheers, >Daniel > > >On 09/08/16 18:46, Alex Balashov wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Problem receiving large payloads from JSONRPC-S

2016-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Have you set the parameter: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#tcp_conn_wq_max Cheers, Daniel On 09/08/16 18:46, Alex Balashov wrote: > FWIW, the total response size according to Content-Length is close to > 1 MB: > > -- > Header says content-length is: 737406 > Chunked: 5660 >