Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Hello, yes, loose_route() should be used there. Can you add a log message and print $ru and $du before and after loose_route() in config and then send the result to this mailing list? Btw, what version of Kamailio are you using? Cheers, Daniel On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote: > Is it c

[SR-Users] SSL Certificate (Second Try)

I'm not sure where to send this information so I hope it's okay to share it with the mailing list, as well as the whois registrants: I went to register for a new account at https://serweb.iptel.org/user/reg. Firefox told me that the SSL certificate was bad. Specifically: -- serweb.iptel.org use

[SR-Users] SSL Certificate

I'm not sure where to send this information so I hope it's okay to share it here: I went to register for a new account at https://serweb.iptel.org/user/reg. Firefox told me that the SSL certificate was bad. Specifically: ___ SIP Express Router (SER)

[SR-Users] Kamailio presence

I have asked this question before, but never really got an answer: Has anybody been able to get BLF working with Yealink phones. Bill ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http:/

[SR-Users] Prepaid system using dialog and sqlops

Hi, I am still struggling to get a prepaid system for my service. After installing SIREMIS, I am able to get the CDRs updated. But even after adding the cron settings, the call duration doesn't get updated. And also in http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-January/071517.html it

[SR-Users] Kamilio Presence

I have asked this question before but never really got an answer. Has anybody ever gotten BLF working with Yealink phones. If you have, please steer me in the right direction Bill ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mai

Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Luke, This is actually the behavior I would expect, though admittedly I've never tried to rely on received= parameter routing for requests (I wasn't aware that was something that should be supported). However, you're probably better of addressing your NAT issues in a different part of your reques

Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Hi All, I've been going through my script against other examples on the internet and cannot see any differences, also changing use_received between 1 and 0 makes no different. Kamailio still uses the Contact header instead of the Route header. If any one has any suggestions it would be very much

Re: [SR-Users] segfault when using sipt modifications

Hello. Look more carefuly, its only first \x00 changes forward call indicator. You have a few more \x00... You does not get full ISUP into INVITE... As I have told earlier you can replace \x00 by \x01into kamailio script, but you must rewrite it with \x00 later into sip-t module, but this requir

Re: [SR-Users] segfault when using sipt modifications

Hello Sergey, Daniel thanks a lot for the guidance. i changed the x00 by x01 and it works now, i was seeing the ISUP truncated but i thought it was related to the tshark XD i will find out about the changes needed at sipt configuration, but just in case, the things chaged by this only are the for

Re: [SR-Users] Fail to register at trunk through UAC

Hi Daniel. Thanks for answer. I will reinstall it today. Ping you ASAP about result 2016-08-01 13:19 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > have you tried with latest master branch? It was a large pull request > merged lately, just to be sure you use current code... > > Cheers, > Danie

Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module? On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg > > modparam("path", "use_received", 1) > > Kind regards, > Luke > > On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >

Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Hi Daniel, Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg modparam("path", "use_received", 1) Kind regards, Luke On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote: > > Hi all, > > Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to so

Re: [SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Hello, On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH > boxes. > > When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header > including received information, example below; > > Route:

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

Hi, do you use "uac_replace_from" or "uac_replace_to" in your logic? If not, it seems to me, that your supplier is messing around with the SIP-Replies. Thanks, Carsten 2016-08-01 14:10 GMT+02:00 Laura : > Dear list, > > i'm asking here a question about Kamailio config. > > We are testing a wid

Re: [SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

Hello, On 01/08/16 14:10, Laura wrote: > Dear list, > > i'm asking here a question about Kamailio config. > > We are testing a wide area configuration of Kamailio over separates > countries and we are still facing with an issue. > > We configured Kamailio 4.3.5 with dialog support over the TM mo

[SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

Hi all, Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH boxes. When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header including received information, example below; Route: ;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126 When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the in

[SR-Users] Configuration Issue on Kamailio.

Dear list, i'm asking here a question about Kamailio config. We are testing a wide area configuration of Kamailio over separates countries and we are still facing with an issue. We configured Kamailio 4.3.5 with dialog support over the TM modules and we use LCR module for menage ours LCRs rule s

Re: [SR-Users] tls with ubuntu 16.04

Hello, not yet ... I didn't get the chance before starting a rather long trip to download the image for ubuntu 16.04 to spin a vm and now I don't have the bandwidth for fetching it. Cheers, Daniel On 01/08/16 13:32, Jayesh Nambiar wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Just checking if you had a chance to look

Re: [SR-Users] Saving and extracting contact header

That's a header parameter and it is not saved in the location record. You can eventually save it as location attribute via xavp. Alternatively, you can move it to the URI, inside the <...> and then it will be in the addr field after reg_fetch_contacts(). Another option is to use htable to store t

Re: [SR-Users] tls with ubuntu 16.04

Hi Daniel, Just checking if you had a chance to look at ssl libraries in Ubuntu16.04 to check the conflict with TLS module? Thanks. - Jayesh On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:11 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > following up -- apparently there is some issue with the lib in ubuntu > 16.04

Re: [SR-Users] Saving and extracting contact header

Thanks Daniel, REGISTER... Contact: ;; Device-ID=123456789 Cheers, Nir On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Depending on the position you add, it can be Contact URI parameter or > Contact header parameter -- maybe you can give an example and then I can > s

Re: [SR-Users] Fail to register at trunk through UAC

Hello, have you tried with latest master branch? It was a large pull request merged lately, just to be sure you use current code... Cheers, Daniel On 01/08/16 10:30, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > Hi.Unfortunattely Probles still exists. > Will be very grateful if someone will help me to understand

Re: [SR-Users] Saving and extracting contact header

Depending on the position you add, it can be Contact URI parameter or Contact header parameter -- maybe you can give an example and then I can see if it is uri or header parameter. Cheers, Daniel On 01/08/16 07:46, Nahum Nir wrote: > > I added costume field to the contact header > > > On 1 Aug 2

Re: [SR-Users] segfault when using sipt modifications

Hello, I am not familiar with isup and no testbed around at this moment. That's why I asked for backtrace from the coredump file, based on the guidelines I did in my previous email. Cheers, Daniel On 01/08/16 09:07, Sergey Basov wrote: > Hello, > > try make dump packet after > append_body_part(

Re: [SR-Users] Fail to register at trunk through UAC

Hi.Unfortunattely Probles still exists. Will be very grateful if someone will help me to understand what is wrong there... thnk you 2016-07-29 15:23 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko : > Also checked all credentians 3 times. > It worked on another platfoms > I tried read sources uac_reg.c > found that

Re: [SR-Users] segfault when using sipt modifications

Hello, try make dump packet after append_body_part("\x01\x12\x49\x00\x0a\x03\x02\x0a\x08\x84\x90\x33\x41\x72\x17\x00\x06\x0a\x08\x04\x13\x93\x70\x21\x73\x23\x10\x08\x01\x00\x00","application/isup;version=itu-t92+","signal;handling=optional"); before sipt_destination($rU, 31, 4); when i have done