Hello,
Just did enable_tls after loadmodule "tls.so" and this now works. Thanks.
- Jayesh
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:06 AM Jayesh Nambiar
wrote:
> I did load the tls first but still get the same error. Here is the
> loadmodule sequence:
>
> loadmodule "tls.so"
>
> loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
>
> lo
I did load the tls first but still get the same error. Here is the
loadmodule sequence:
loadmodule "tls.so"
loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
loadmodule "kex.so"
loadmodule "corex.so"
loadmodule "tm.so"
loadmodule "tmx.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
loadmodule "rr.so"
loadmodule "pv.so"
loadmodule "maxfwd.
Thanks!
you should use $fti and $tti only after loose_route().
If used before, it doesn't find the proper Route header and assumes
downstream. The issue actually is the fact that there is some caching
done in this case, to avoid doing same processing many times for same
sip message. So getting a
Hello,
you should use $fti and $tti only after loose_route().
If used before, it doesn't find the proper Route header and assumes
downstream. The issue actually is the fact that there is some caching
done in this case, to avoid doing same processing many times for same
sip message. So getting aga
Hello,
load first the tls module and then the others.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/07/16 19:54, Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
> Opensl Version:
>
> OpenSSL 1.0.2g-fips 1 Mar 2016
>
>
> Order of loadmodules:
>
> loadmodule"mi_fifo.so"
>
> loadmodule"kex.so"
>
> loadmodule"corex.so"
>
> loadmodule"tm.so"
>
> lo
I'm missing something obvious here, throwing this out to get a couple
extra sets of eyeballs on it.
I can't get rr modules is_direction() or the $fti / $tti pv's to work in
4.3.x or 4.4.x
Relevant parts of the config:
loadmodule "rr.so"
modparam ("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
Opensl Version:
OpenSSL 1.0.2g-fips 1 Mar 2016
Order of loadmodules:
loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
loadmodule "kex.so"
loadmodule "corex.so"
loadmodule "tm.so"
loadmodule "tmx.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
loadmodule "rr.so"
loadmodule "pv.so"
loadmodule "maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "dialog.so"
loadmodu
Hello,
can you provide details about:
- order of loaded modules:
grep "loadmodule" kamailio.cfg
- the version of libssl
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/07/16 16:48, Jayesh Nambiar wrote:
> Hi,
> Trying kamailio with Ubuntu 16.04 and I'm getting errors as follows:
>
> ERROR: tls [tls_init.c:490]: tls_
Hi,
Hint: It would be convenient, if everyone just used reply to all ;-)
Can you elaborate your question a bit more? Currently, there are two
instances of the dispatcher being used:
1) At the Proxy-CSCF (for the SEMS SBC's, if needed)
2) At the Serving-CSCF's (for the Interconnect, in case th
Thanks Loic,
Yes, thats correct Kernel decides the interface to take. That is why I want
to figure out if we have any way to foresee that decision !
I got to know a new thing: onsend_route:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/features:new-in-3.0.x#onsend_route
I will try and make use of thi
Hi,
Interface selection is done by kernel when routing lookup is done, no ?
If you have the same destination and multiple interface to reach it, kernel
will chose the best one (according metric values).
If you want to force trafic to go through an interface, interface must be
attached to different
Hi,
Trying kamailio with Ubuntu 16.04 and I'm getting errors as follows:
ERROR: tls [tls_init.c:490]: tls_pre_init(): Unable to set the memory
allocation functions
The error is identical to the one mentioned here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kamailio/+bug/1591992
Is there a soluti
The pipelimit module is the solution to all your problems.
On 07/13/2016 04:09 AM, NITESH BANSAL wrote:
Actually, I forgot to mention that, I'm looking for a Kamailio module
which can do that.
I want to avoid doing it on the application level (in perl/python).
Thanks,
Nitesh
--
Actually, I forgot to mention that, I'm looking for a Kamailio module which can
do that.
I want to avoid doing it on the application level (in perl/python).
Thanks,
Nitesh
From: sr-users on behalf of NITESH
BANSAL
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:19:35 AM
To
How shared memory pool concept has been implemented?
Why shm_mem_size * 32 is being allocated?
Is the entire segment separated by 32 byte byt 32 byte?
Please explain me the shared memory pool in Kamailio.
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 1
On 13/07/16 08:56, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> The right format to try for a variable with index would have been
>> $(tls_my_san_hostname[2]) -- have you tried that, too?
> $var(san2) = $(tls_my_san_hostname[2]);
> xlog("L_INFO", "*** $var(
16 matches
Mail list logo
