Hello Community,
I'm trying to read data (hash) stored in redis database, from kamailio
script.
I read the module documentation ndb_redis:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/ndb_redis.html#idp26300788
But I'but I don't understand what I'm doing wrong :/
With someone has had exper
Hi Jay,
Can you paste your listen= lines from kamailio.cfg?
Best regards,
Joel.
- Original Message -
> From: "jay binks"
> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 8:40:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] (no subject)
> I cant believe I sent this without a
Sounds like a great question for the CGRateS mailing list. :-)
On 06/27/2016 01:26 PM, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install cgrates , but face this issue with database.
"
ERROR 1067 (42000) at line 7: Invalid default value for 'deleted_at'
"
is encountered in create_cdrs
Hi,
I am trying to install cgrates , but face this issue with database.
"
ERROR 1067 (42000) at line 7: Invalid default value for 'deleted_at'
"
is encountered in create_cdrs_tables.sql .
Can somebody let me know how to overcome this?
regards
Ganesh Kumar
__
Sorry my thoughts weren't correct. When disabling rtpproxy in the local
kamailio installation, I have one way audio. The caller, local SIP user,
can hear audio from the user registered on the PSTN address, which also
can't hang up the call.
It seems to me that the kamailio PSTN gateway can't engage
You have a negation of the function int the if expression, respectively:
!check_user_blacklist(...)
If the function returns true on record match and you want to reject in
that case, then just remove the ! in the expression.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/06/16 14:11, Jan Hazenberg wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Se
Hi Christoff,
yes, it will - I back-ported to the 4.4 branch.
Cheers
Jason
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Christoph Valentin <
christoph.valen...@gmx.at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will this bugfix be part of the release 4.4.2?
>
> Thanks,
> Christoph
>
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 07. Juni 2016 um 16:48 Uh
Hi,
Will this bugfix be part of the release 4.4.2?
Thanks,
Christoph
Gesendet: Dienstag, 07. Juni 2016 um 16:48 Uhr
Von: "Christoph Valentin"
An: "Jason Penton"
Cc: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] S-CSCF (k
Daniel,
Seems like it is not working anymore, i now have configured:
if (!check_user_blacklist("blacklist", "oranjelaan.net",
"318001234")) {
xlog("L_ALERT", "ALERT: $rU is blacklisted, rejecting
call - IP=$si PORT=$sp R=$ru ID=$ci FU=$fu M=$rm UA=$ua\n");
I suppose there's a lot of subjectivity here - and it greatly depends on
your configuration - but at least for my use case I don't quite agree with
that statement. My API is already the component performing authentication
and making routing decisions anyway, which means Kamailio is going to send
th
FWIW, I think that from a security and software quality perspective, explicitly
defining which headers you want to feed to the API is the much better approach
anyway.
-- Alex
--
Principal, Evariste Systems LLC (www.evaristesys.com)
Sent from my Google Nexus.
Yeah, I saw $mb as I was browsing through things. I was hoping to not have
to re-parse the SIP message in the API since Kamailio has already done that
work, and it would require some form of a SIP parser in my API.
As a future feature request, I'll say that I think this would be a helpful
addition
Have you done any tests to see if runtime works fine as well? Just to be
sure nothing was broken.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/06/16 13:46, Jan Hazenberg wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Yes that seems to fix the problem. Kamailio now starts without crashing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jan
>
>
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schre
> On 26 Jun 2016, at 22:29, Colin Morelli wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Back with more questions.
>
> I'm using Kamailio to make an HTTP call to my API to perform authentication
> and message routing. Currently, I'm trying to build up the post body that I
> send to my API to make those decisions.
Daniel,
Yes that seems to fix the problem. Kamailio now starts without crashing.
Thanks,
Jan
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2016-06-27 13:08:
Can you try with the master branch or backport the next commit?
-
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5fd2c91f512b7311f11c76023da45758
Can you try with the master branch or backport the next commit?
-
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5fd2c91f512b7311f11c76023da45758fb8c4365
If all ok, then I push the backported patch to stable branches.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/06/16 11:57, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> The spec i
The spec is null, so the crash is obvious. I have to look at the code to
see why it expect to be a spec there, while it can be a static string.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/06/16 10:57, Jan Hazenberg wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Here the requested gdb output:
>
> (gdb) frame 1
> #1 0x7f22fd252ece in check_
Hello everybody,
I have a local kamailio+rtpproxy under NAT listening on multiple local
interfaces (vlans) which works fluenty for all local user indipendently and
engages rtpproxy correctly.
I have another working kamailio+rtpproxy which is accessible from
everywhere at a public address and I wou
On 06/27/2016 11:01 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> as far as I can remember, sending a redirect 3xx response takes in
> consideration any new request URI, which is added as contact. Now, not
> sure why the second parameter of get_contacts() would influence that, no
> much time to look at the
Hello,
as far as I can remember, sending a redirect 3xx response takes in
consideration any new request URI, which is added as contact. Now, not
sure why the second parameter of get_contacts() would influence that, no
much time to look at the code.
But, meanwhile, can you try with revert_uri() in
Daniel,
Here the requested gdb output:
(gdb) frame 1
#1 0x7f22fd252ece in check_user_blacklist_fixup
(param=0x7f23061cdd88, param_no=1) at userblacklist.c:213
213 if(str2int(&s, (unsigned
int*)&model->spec->pvp.pvn.u.isname.name.n) != 0) {
(gdb) info l
On 06/22/2016 07:45 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Looking quickly at the code, both versions of the functions are
> executing the same inner function, but there can still be some
> conditions on the reason parameter, so I need to dig in further.
>
> However, I need to understand first what
22 matches
Mail list logo
