[SR-Users] IP TOS

2016-06-10 Thread Daniel W. Graham
Could I get some clarification on tos global setting as referenced by documentation below? Specifically, are DSCP values allowed? Or is this simply for scheduling purposes at the OS level? I can change the value once packets hit the network but if possible would like 0x60 to originate from Kam

Re: [SR-Users] Push notification question

2016-06-10 Thread Vasiliy Ganchev
Hi! To cope with your specific cases try connection-oriented transport (tcp/tls). e.g. if app is closed - the connection is closed as well and the usrloc record will be removed. After this use standard approach (with late forking - tsilo module) imho, it is not a good idea to suspend the call i

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread gmele
Hi Federico, Thx for your great help. We will update our config and see how it works. Ciao Giovanni Mele Le 10 juin 2016 à 11:56, "Federico Cabiddu-3 [via SIP Router]" mailto:ml-node+s1086192n149400...@n5.nabble.com>> a écrit : Hi Giovanni, see my answers inline On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:2

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Hi Giovanni, see my answers inline On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:29 AM, gmele wrote: > Hi Federico, > > > > Correct me if I’m wrong, but the INVITE will be sent to all user entries > registered in the location table, right? If both the desktop client and the > mobile phone are registered in this ta

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread gmele
Hi Federico, Correct me if I’m wrong, but the INVITE will be sent to all user entries registered in the location table, right? If both the desktop client and the mobile phone are registered in this table, but the mobile contact info incorrect (wrong ip/port), how Kamailio will handle the tcp_co

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Hi Giovanni, in this case, supposing that the desktop client is registered, you send the INVITE to it, you store the transaction and you send the push WITHOUT suspending the transaction. Then you append to the transaction additional branch(es) as soon as the mobile client register. I hope I underst

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread Mele Giovanni
Hello Federico, Thx for you input. We are effectively using TS_SILO module to store the transactions. The link to your presentation is very interesting! Grazie! In your presentation, the multi-device scenario assumes all devices are able to receive push notifs, but what happens if you have one

Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Hi, for this kind of scenarios I'd suggest to use the TSILO module which have been thought for mobile multidevice scenarios: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tsilo.html. Basically what you can do is: send the INVITE to the desktop phone, store the transaction, send the push to wa

[SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question

2016-06-10 Thread gmele
Hello, we are using the TM Module* t_suspend *function in our kamailio to suspend transactions (mainly INVITE requests). We do this as we send some push notification to the callee that will force it to re-REGISTER. Once we get the REGISTER, we resume the transaction with a *t_continue()*. If the

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-06-10 Thread Dmitry
When I make internal call between 2 internal subscribers (yate softphones). The subscriber B answeres, after all the Kamailio/rtpengine sends a 200ok  reply to the subscriber A, but the softphone does not recognize it (it does not ACK it). I think it is because of its SDP which the RTPENGINE rep