Re: [SR-Users] NSQ libevbuffsock dependency

Hello, On 30/05/16 17:03, smititelu wrote: > On 30.05.2016 17:55, smititelu wrote: >> Is there other recommended way, to install the library besides >> compiling from sources at [1]? > > L.E. : apt-get doesn't find the library even after an update/upgrade. > My system is an Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS. P

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy question

Hello, are you sure rtpproxy 2.0 does encryption/decryption of the RTP/SRTP? I haven't noticed that the v2.0 has support for such feature. What are the parameters you are using to control rtpproxy from kamailio.cfg? Cheers, Daniel On 01/06/16 12:18, Albert Petit wrote: > Hi list > > I have ins

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

Interesting to know that some devices still can't handle sip spirals... Cheers, Daniel On 01/06/16 18:16, Mx R wrote: > Thanks Daniel > > modparam("topoh", "mask_callid", 1) > > It worked. > > 2016-05-17 17:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel Tryba >: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

I pushed the commit to add the new parameter to the master branch. Let me know if works as expected. Cheers, Daniel On 01/06/16 12:58, Aleš Šturm wrote: > > Excellent, > > > > I didn’t think about different db connectors. But, your proposal is > the best choice. If you are willing to prepare c

Re: [SR-Users] sip trace

Just some of them are missing. It logged the INVITES coming from the carrier but not the response back. ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.

Thanks Daniel modparam("topoh", "mask_callid", 1) It worked. 2016-05-17 17:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel Tryba : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:08:45PM +0300, Mx R wrote: > > In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model > > HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245 / V1R003C00S205 we have the followin

Re: [SR-Users] Dynamic advertised ip for rtpengine/rtpproxy

On 06/01/2016 04:26 AM, Serge S. Yuriev wrote: Hello, Thanks a lot. If I understand docs correctly there is no such thing for RTPEngine and we should use app params? Yes there is, you can give it as "media-address=..." inside the options string to the respective function calls. Cheers

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

Excellent, I didn’t think about different db connectors. But, your proposal is the best choice. If you are willing to prepare correction I can test it. Please let me know. All the best, Ales From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

Hello, to have full flexibility here I am thinking of adding a new module parameter to set the order-by string when the retrieve_order=1, as it may be different for various db connectors. The default will be 'priority', which is what is done right now. That will practically cover also the case of

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

Hello, yes, when retrieve_order=1, then order has to be combination of columns »priority« and »received_time«, because there can be multiple records with the same priority, but with different received_time. And we would like to publish the newest status. My example: mysql> select

[SR-Users] rtpproxy question

Hi list I have installed a newer version of rtpproxy (2.0) in our development server , i was happy because it brings lot of performance improvements However i have found an issue when clients use TLS+SRTP In that scenario i do not want rtpproxy to decrypt/reencrypt the traffic as my B2BUA does t

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

On 01/06/16 10:42, Aleš Šturm wrote: > > Hello, > > > > yes, if the priority is the same, records should be ordered by > received_time. Acting in this way, when “presentity” table has more > than one record of the same user with equal priority, to watcher would > be send Notify message with las

Re: [SR-Users] Send Register from Kamailio

Alright, thank you! I’ll try the credentials param, we only have 1 credential so that won’t change that often. I think I can manage this with database views for each instance of kamailio to return only the registrations belonging to that instance. From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.s

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

Hello, yes, if the priority is the same, records should be ordered by received_time. Acting in this way, when "presentity" table has more than one record of the same user with equal priority, to watcher would be send Notify message with last received status. SQL like: select * from present

Re: [SR-Users] Send Register from Kamailio

Hello;     i never tried credential parameter. i used with database so i can add new registration without restarting kamailio. there are so many rpc command to control it. you can use the same table with multiple kamailio that some regist

Re: [SR-Users] Dynamic advertised ip for rtpengine/rtpproxy

Hello, Thanks a lot. If I understand docs correctly there is no such thing for RTPEngine and we should use app params? On 01/06/16 10:08, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 27/05/16 21:02, Serge Yuriev wrote: Hi, We have several exits from our network and all of them natted. Could

Re: [SR-Users] Send Register from Kamailio

Thank you! The UAC module has a modparam: reg_db_url which contains a description of: "DB URL to fetch account profiles for registration". Is this required? If so, is it possible to use the same table for multiple kamailio instances where each instance has to register with different credentials

Re: [SR-Users] Send Register from Kamailio

Hello; you can register anything with uac module. it is useful module. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Send-Register-from-Kamailio-tp149003p149004.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

[SR-Users] Send Register from Kamailio

Hello, Which module do I need to have Kamailio send REGISTER messages to our carrier? Is it the UAC module or REGISTRAR module? It just needs to register with our carrier in order to receive inbound calls. Regards, Grant ___ SIP Express Router (SER) a

Re: [SR-Users] advertise xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 is weird

Looking closer at the trace, at 192.168.3.97 seems to be a 4.0.4 ... Can you run at least 4.3.x? Because there are commands to see the details of the listen sockets with kamcmd, which will display the advertised address and by that you can ensure the right configuration is been used. Cheers, Dani

Re: [SR-Users] DHCP renewal conflicts with kamailio?

Hello, I guess there is no IP associated with the network interface during the dhcp procedure, meaning that the kernel will return error whenever kamailio (or other app) tries to send something. Typically this was resolved in the *unix systems by having the hooks of ifup/ifdown to stop/start the a

Re: [SR-Users] advertise xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 is weird

Hi i am using Kamailio 4.1.x for centos - Mail original - De: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" À: "Sébastien Brice" Cc: "sr-users" Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Juin 2016 09:05:35 Objet: Re: [SR-Users] advertise xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 is weird Hello, On 30/05/16 20:24, Sébastien Brice wrote: > Hi Dani

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status

Hello, skipping the other content to fit in size limits for mailing list ... On 27/05/16 11:59, Aleš Šturm wrote: > *I think that statuses with equal “priority” are retrieved by “id” and > not by “received_time”!?* Is the above the conclusion and the fix would be to order by received_time if the

Re: [SR-Users] sip trace

On 27/05/16 20:30, Jeremy Betts wrote: > I have a new carrier that wants sip traces of certain scenarios. They > also require IPSEC tunnelling for all SIP messages. So when I use > tcpdump or any other similar tool I can see the incoming SIP messages > but outgoing SIP messages are ESP encoded. >

Re: [SR-Users] Dynamic advertised ip for rtpengine/rtpproxy

Hello, On 27/05/16 21:02, Serge Yuriev wrote: > Hi, > > We have several exits from our network and all of them natted. > Could we set adv ip for rtpproxy/rtpengine from db in realtime or we must > define them on daemon run time only? > the advertise can be configured as parameter for rtpproxy/rt

Re: [SR-Users] advertise xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060 is weird

Hello, On 30/05/16 20:24, Sébastien Brice wrote: > Hi Daniel, > of course please find the capture attached. > 192.168.3.97 is the local proxy, i want to have it behaves like and edge > router, handling incoming and outgoing traffic. > 192.168.3.19 (401@) is an user agent and 192.168.3.33 (405@)