Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio routing to different carriers based on prefix

2016-05-24 Thread ycaner
Hello; any failure situation, it selects carrierfailureroute first ip, and compare it with failed route. if it is the same ip and avoid_failed_destinations is 1 , it resend again the same ip. if gets failed again , next failureroute will be chosen. every carrier_id ,domain_id ,prefix and flags ha

[SR-Users] call count / and work with despatcher

2016-05-24 Thread jaflong jaflong
Hi Everyone, What is a accurate way to get current call count. I am only relaying calls. Initialy I tried the code below. It seemed to work, it reported the correct number of calls I had dialed. I get the result through kamcmd htable get command. -- un

Re: [SR-Users] call count / and work with despatcher

2016-05-24 Thread Alex Balashov
Seems like your best bet is to use the dialog module, which the state of a call through all phases. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://w

[SR-Users] Kamailio routing to different carriers based on prefix

2016-05-24 Thread José Seabra
Hi there, I'm looking for a solution to route calls based on prefix, my routing table might reach a long list of prefixs. I looked to carrierroute and it seems to be nice for this purpose but i have some doubts to how to handle correctly with carrierroute. IfI understood correctly, if I set the

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, there were some changes in the logging system to allow custom "transport" for syslog messages -- like those implemented by the new log_* modules. But they should not affect the old (and still default) mode. I just looked at one deployment running actually master branch (which has no change

Re: [SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

2016-05-24 Thread Sebastian Damm
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: > Hi, > > I upgraded one of our systems today to 4.4.1. And when checking > whether everything is okay, I noticed, that only the first UDP > listener (from kamcmd core.ps) is actually sending lines to the log. > The only other logs I see are f

[SR-Users] 4.4.1: Only first UDP Listener is producing log messages

2016-05-24 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi, I upgraded one of our systems today to 4.4.1. And when checking whether everything is okay, I noticed, that only the first UDP listener (from kamcmd core.ps) is actually sending lines to the log. The only other logs I see are from usrloc timer worker. kamcmd> core.ps 10737 main process - atte

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Laura
Hi Carsten, you right about that.. without topoh module the branch is ok. I did some test and all seem to work correctly. I forgot to say that we used topoh for "mask" the real ip of the A-LEG customer over platform, and without the topoh modules i can see all the real ip in the Via: records.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi Laura, if it's just about advertising the IP, then you can simply do the following: listen=udp:10.10.10.10:5060 advertise 11.11.11.11:5060 (http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#listen) which will put 11.11.11.11 instead of the own, local IP. Thanks, Carsten 2016-05-24 14:40 GM

[SR-Users] Create "Contac Groups" on the server Kamailio

2016-05-24 Thread ALFONSO MARTINEZ GOMEZ
Hi, I'm working on a VoIP communication application with Kamailio as SIP server and using the SIREMIS interface. As an administrator, I can add "Subscribers" which later will be registered on the server so that they can make the necessary negotiations when they want to make a call. My question

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Laura
Hello, honestly we only use the topoh modules for this # topoh paramiters modparam("topoh", "mask_ip", "1.1.1.1") Pratically we created a cluster and we use VRRP for HA of the service.. so we use topoh for menage the virtual IP on kamailio.. Is there any other way we could use for stop using t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
ups .. wrong thread for the reply... On 24/05/16 13:13, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hello, > > for how long you got this 20req/second? > > The module is not counting like continuous time, but more like traffic > on each second, iirc. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 24/05/16 13:11, Daniel-Co

Re: [SR-Users] doubt using rate limit

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, for how long you got this 20req/second? The module is not counting like continuous time, but more like traffic on each second, iirc. Cheers, Daniel On 23/05/16 11:24, david escartin wrote: > Hello all > > i have a quick question about using module ratelimit on kamailio 4.2 > or 4.4. > o

Re: [SR-Users] Please help me setting up Kamailio for android application

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, as a first step, see the installation tutorials at: - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ It gets you up with a running kamailio, then play with it, read the kamailio.cfg file. If you have more specific questions about features you want to add, return here on mailing list with the questions.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, for how long you got this 20req/second? The module is not counting like continuous time, but more like traffic on each second, iirc. Cheers, Daniel On 24/05/16 13:11, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hello, > > the long Via branch is because of using topoh module. Do you need that? >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the long Via branch is because of using topoh module. Do you need that? The alternatives would be: - disable topoh module - or configure the kernel to do udp defragmentation (should be default in modern linux) - or switch to tcp/tls - or try to use the new topos module in 4.4 -- no

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio for sip routing architecture

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 24/05/16 10:09, Loic Chabert wrote: > Hello, > > I can't use load balancing feature because location of sip user is > defined. but then how the DNS is returning the appropriate server? Or each user has a different domain? > One DID is routed to one server. One to one relationship. The

Re: [SR-Users] Found bug at ACC

2016-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 24/05/16 10:08, Pavel Eremin wrote: > Hi all, when we set syslog facility for ACC to LOCAL3, log_write_cdr() > will write at LOG_DAEMON anyway. > You have to recompile module acc to user another default syslog > facility to save cdr with another syslog facility. what do you mean that

[SR-Users] Found bug at ACC

2016-05-24 Thread Pavel Eremin
Hi all, when we set syslog facility for ACC to LOCAL3, log_write_cdr() will write at LOG_DAEMON anyway. You have to recompile module acc to user another default syslog facility to save cdr with another syslog facility. ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kam

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio for sip routing architecture

2016-05-24 Thread Loic Chabert
Hello, I can't use load balancing feature because location of sip user is defined. One DID is routed to one server. One to one relationship. So if loadblancer send phone call on one server, but user is not registred on this one, call is hangup/lost. I will use LCR for outgoing call. LCR will "hel

[SR-Users] Kamailio Via: header issue

2016-05-24 Thread Laura
Good morning list, I need to ask you a question about a problem we are fighting on our VoIP platform based on Kamailio 4.3.5. Our platform is made by more nodes over Europe countries, and we are encountering a problem with the size of the SIP package which, exceeds the physiological limit of about