[SR-Users] Change CANCEL reason when fr_timer expires

Hello all! I have a situation here where when I send a INVITE to some specific user-agents in my environment I must change the fr_timer to a value lower than the default. I can acomplish this using the "t_set_fr" commands in my cfg file, and it works like a charm. The point is that when the time

Re: [SR-Users] extra characters in re-invite "TO" field

Hi,We use UAC module to modify FROM header (adding org tag) in the initial INVITE. The far end send us reinvite after 15 min by replacing FROM and TO field content. Therefore, otg tag will apprear in TO header in the reinvite. Kamilio ver 3.3.7 does not handle otg tag in the TO header. However,

Re: [SR-Users] extra characters in re-invite "TO" field

Hello, are you using uac module to replace the to/from header for initial invite? Cheers, Daniel On 20/05/16 15:15, Al S wrote: > Hi, > > Kamailio adds extra characters in the re-invite "TO" field during > session timer. There is no header manipulation in our route[WITHINDLG] > block. > > Re-I

Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pua-dialog info

You’re not going to have any of the patches I did – I believe they are all in 4.4. Though… now I look back at them, I’m not sure if any of them are relevant to your problem. The only one that might be relevant is https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/514 - specifically commit 1c0242f... Tho

[SR-Users] kamctl stats shmem error changing shared memory

Hi, i have a problem with my kamailio installation. Actually i set the shared memory to 128MB and it's all fine. When i increase the shared memory to 256Mb and more i get the following error while checking kamctl commands (like kamctl stats shmem) ERROR: Error opening Kamailio's FIFO /var/run/ka

[SR-Users] extra characters in re-invite "TO" field

Hi, Kamailio adds extra characters in the re-invite "TO" field during session timer. There is no header manipulation in our route[WITHINDLG] block. Re-INVITE received by KamailioTo: ;tag=1c1048632956 Re-INVITE forwarded by KamailioTo: ;tag=1c1048632956 Your help would be greatly appreciated. T

Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pua-dialog info

Thanks for your response phil Kamailio version 4.1.8 Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Phil Lavin wrote: > > Which version of Kamailio? > > We had a tonne of issues with this module – many of which I submitted fixes > for. > > There were 2 issues that could not be resolved

[SR-Users] Question about testing RTPENGINE

Hello I am trying to make a test setup to test the RTPENGINE. Now my setup is Kazoo . i.e.: Subsriber A ---Asterisk (192.168.175.132)-via NAT-Kamailio(10.10.11.104) FreeSwitch(10.10.11.104)  Subscriber B is connected directly to Kamailio (this subscriber is in the same networ

Re: [SR-Users] Browser WebRTC transcoder

Yes, now it is working both ways. I was missing the rtpengine and right configuration. I will do some further testing to see if everything is functional. Thanks, > To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > From: rfu...@sipwise.com > Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:22:26 -0400 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Bro

Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pua-dialog info

Which version of Kamailio? We had a tonne of issues with this module – many of which I submitted fixes for. There were 2 issues that could not be resolved after a fair bit of trying: · The presentity table was not cleared of the old state when a new state occurred (e.g. both trying and