[SR-Users] Strange behaviour in working with CNXCC

2016-04-12 Thread Dirk Teurlings [Upexia]
Hi, Working with CNXCC for quite some time now with success. Though running into the following problem. Running Kamailio 4.4 (Debian Wheezy) from the Kamailio repository. Setting up CNXCC with a dialog start event route, a dialog end event route and a cnxcc:shutdown event route. In the start even

Re: [SR-Users] Misrouting ACK packet for 200 Ok messages.

2016-04-12 Thread Alex Balashov
Yasin, 1. The Request URI of the ACK must match the Contact of the other end (the Contact URI in the 200 OK), was you correctly surmised. This includes all attributes of the Contact URI, including port. 2. The ACK you pasted needs to contain Route: headers whose values match the Record-Route

[SR-Users] Misrouting ACK packet for 200 Ok messages.

2016-04-12 Thread Yasin CANER
Hello;     before sending this email i searched on google and doesnt solve this issue. all call flows are correct but one call that this isnt working right. it sends to wrong port to ACK for 200 OK. i tried to fix contact header or remove contact header but it wasnt w

Re: [SR-Users] Detecting calls with missing ACK (Lazy SIP scanners)

2016-04-12 Thread Marrold
Hi, >>On 06/04/16 01:57, Marrold wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> I can confirm that t_any_timeout(), and t_branch_timeout() return true >> when these un-ACKd transactions occur. > by un-ACKed, do you mean they didn't receive any response or they didn't > receive the ACK following a response to an INV

[SR-Users] Kamailio 5.0 - Routing blocks in embedded scripting languages - Lua

2016-04-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, based on some of the plans for Kamailio 5.0 (https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/kamailio-5.0-design), I started the implementation for the support to allow writing the active routing logic at runtime (respectively what are now the routing blocks) in other embedded languages than the native

Re: [SR-Users] [kamailio 5.0] upgrade VS rollback/backward compatibility

2016-04-12 Thread Alex Balashov
‎I personally am against this 'version' table concept altogether. It just makes life difficult for expert users without meaningfully solving the problem it seeks to solve.  It's just an arbitrary table; what guarantees does it offer that the version of the definition of table X corresponds to t

[SR-Users] [kamailio 5.0] upgrade VS rollback/backward compatibility

2016-04-12 Thread Juha Heinanen
Alex Lutay writes: > The point here that Kamailio checks DB table_version and doesn't start > if the version mismatch found. Yes, it makes sense to be able to run older version of k on newer table versions as long as newer versions of tables are backwards compatible, e.g., a new field has been ad

[SR-Users] [kamailio 5.0] upgrade VS rollback/backward compatibility

2016-04-12 Thread Alex Lutay
Hi, We are heavily using Kamailio in our product Sipwise NGCP and currently testing possibility to provide rollback for the customers with the huge systems as the last resort functionality in case if upgrade went wrong. We hope never use it on practice but prefer to have such possibility. The mai