Re: [SR-Users] (no subject)

2016-02-29 Thread Loïc Boissy
Hello, Did you find something in our config? Best regards Loïc 2016-02-26 9:12 GMT+01:00 Loïc Boissy : > Hi Luis > Thank you for your help. > > I am sorry but i don't understand your response. > Can you explain a little more your idea? > > Best regards. > Loic > > > 2016-02-25 17:41 GMT+01:00 Lu

Re: [SR-Users] Releasing Kamailio v4.3.5

2016-02-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, short note to remind about releasing v4.3.5 a bit later this week, just in case someone discovered any new issue that was not reported. Cheers, Daniel On 24/02/16 09:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > it's been a while since the release of v4.3.4, therefore I am > considerin

Re: [SR-Users] Domain Reload issue

2016-02-29 Thread Errol Samuels
Hi ycaner, Thanks somehow I missed the upgrade because I was using version 4.1 repo so the upgrade only went to 4.2.0. Now I have upgraded to 4.2.7 and it seems to have corrected the issue. Regards, Errol On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:58 PM, ycaner wrote: > Hello. > There isnt enough log to s

Re: [SR-Users] catching lost websocket ua

2016-02-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > The index can be useful if there is an operation in the config file, > because I think the module doesn't do any match internally only on this > column. It is possible to save connection_id to hash table based on source ip/port and then on connection close add s

Re: [SR-Users] Domain Reload issue

2016-02-29 Thread ycaner
Hello. There isnt enough log to solve problem. Maybe, it can be solved when updated to 4.2 news version. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Domain-Reload-issue-tp146039p146071.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [SR-Users] Domain Reload issue

2016-02-29 Thread Errol Samuels
Any idea? On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Errol Samuels wrote: > Hi All, > > I seem to have an issue when I run the command "kamctl domain reload" > where kamailio stops running. > > Feb 27 07:40:16 il-kam01 kernel: [878538.747898] traps: kamailio[11903] > general protection ip:7f19ca760a20 sp

Re: [SR-Users] catching lost websocket ua

2016-02-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 29/02/16 09:21, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >>> Also, an index on connection_id would need to be created for location >>> table. >> there is already a connection_id in the database table location? Or do >> you mean something else? > Yes, but no index on it. Witho

Re: [SR-Users] Help

2016-02-29 Thread gerry kernan
Hi I found  this info very helpful when setting up a scenario similar to your required setup. https://txlab.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/kamailio-as-a-pass-through-proxy/ Gerry Kernan Infinity IT | 17 The Mall | Beacon Court | Sandyford | Dublin D18 E3C8 | Ireland Tel

Re: [SR-Users] catching lost websocket ua

2016-02-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > Also, an index on connection_id would need to be created for location > > table. > > there is already a connection_id in the database table location? Or do > you mean something else? Yes, but no index on it. Without an index, it may take a long time to delet