>
> Currently I don't want to enable location services. I can drop the PUBLISH
> requests but first I'd like to under stand the reason for the loop.
>
> > The looping happens when the domain in the R-URI is pointing to same
> server, but it is not listed as local domain for kamailio. You have to ad
Sorry forgot to specify (in-memory) not using the DB, I feel like using the DB
for such a task would be such a drag on it
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.o
Since this thread is open, I wanted to ask, is it possible to replicate dialog
data over to multiple nodes as well?
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-
Suggestions for how to solve your problem:
- Create your own associations via 'htable':
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/htable.html
- Use a Record-Route parameter of some description:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/rr.html#add-rr-param-id
--
Alex Balashov | Prin
Uri,
AVPs are associated with particular transactions, and that context is
visible only in an onreply_route that is specifically armed when that
transaction is created (i.e. via t_relay()):
t_on_reply("MY_REPLY_ROUTE");
The default onreply_route processes replies statelessly -- that's why
before route[relay] i set $avp(x)="test"
on the managed onreply_route i can use $avp(x).
on the default onreply_route it is not available. meaning .
is that how it suppose to work?
it makes it difficult to block a certain 200ok, like i meant to, on the
issue - "how to drop 200ok and survive?"
th
On 02/22/2016 02:28 PM, Armen Babikyan wrote:
If your process is also acting as a SIP proxy, you may wish to consider
preloading route headers into the UAC-generated message and sending the
packets to the proxy port (where they would go through request_route as
any other proxied request, and via
If your process is also acting as a SIP proxy, you may wish to consider
preloading route headers into the UAC-generated message and sending the
packets to the proxy port (where they would go through request_route as any
other proxied request, and via onreply/failure routes for responses).
It does
Ok, perfect. One last question, I have done this in the past but it's been long
enough that it slipped my mind. Do I need to remove current files and do
make/make install on the new source or what is the proper way to jump versions?
Thanks!
-dan
-Original Message-
From: sr-users [mailto
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:08:00AM +, Derek Bolichowski wrote:
> I am not able to register any devices to this SRV record. However I
> /CAN/ register directly to kam1.some-domain.com and
> kam2.some-domain.com
>
> Registration attempts to the DNSSRV Record (kam.some-domain.com) do
> not even
Hi,
quick note:
It should not be necessary to change any source-code to make the
reginfo work. At least on my setups this is not needed.
I'll check with my own configs later today or tomorrow, to help you out here.
Thanks,
Carsten
2016-02-22 9:41 GMT+01:00 Cristina Caridi :
> Hello Franz,
>
> th
Hello Franz,
thank you for your support!
I confirm that I changed the pcscf uri that was by default for smilecoms.I
agree with you, the problem is that the P-CSCF is not able to handle the
notify message. In the next days I will try to modify the code in the
config file even if I'm not a developer
12 matches
Mail list logo
