Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] RFC: removing (disabling) fork=no

2016-01-20 Thread Olle E. Johansson
> On 20 Jan 2016, at 09:19, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hello, > > wondering if anyone is using fork=no -- some old docs suggest it is > suitable for debugging, but actually kamailio doesn't work properly in > this mode, leading to more troubles than benefits (e.g., having reports > of

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Alex Balashov
On 01/20/2016 12:35 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Can you check with commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/0ce66908ee9da74806e2fa506ef98b5f9043e47c It seems it was a stupid improper cancel detection bug, but I didn't have the environment the test the patch. That seems to

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and freeswitch integration for SBC

2016-01-20 Thread malik sherif
Copy and paste part of tcmdump and highlighted the 404. 10.22.52.2 is the server IP address Thanks again Abdul .4.INVITE sip:7632689...@abdulkamailiosip.com SIP/2.0 From: 7632689991 ;tag=1378608-a163217-13c4-17e5-662d0efc-17e5 To: Call-ID: 137c190-a163217-13c4-17e5-3d0913f8-1...@ab

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and freeswitch integration for SBC

2016-01-20 Thread malik sherif
Hello Daniel, Thanks again for responding. Should I attached tcmpdump file or just copy and paste the 404 response? Thanks Abdul From: sr-users on behalf of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:51 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing

Re: [SR-Users] Strange PUA Behaviour

2016-01-20 Thread Phil Lavin
Hi Daniel, Sorry for the delay in replying. I've attached blf.cap which shows the "light stays on" scenario. You'll see that the final NOTIFY (packet 43) is a "confirmed" rather than a "terminated" as per the PUBLISH (packet 41) that triggered it. I've also attached presentity.txt which is th

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Can you check with commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/0ce66908ee9da74806e2fa506ef98b5f9043e47c It seems it was a stupid improper cancel detection bug, but I didn't have the environment the test the patch. Cheers, Daniel On 20/01/16 16:48, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 01/20/2016 02

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 20/01/16 17:04, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 01/20/2016 11:01 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> But you reminded me that I should highlight again that private replies >> to mailing discussions are unlikely to be followed, going in the common >> folder (no longer filtered by mailing list ru

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Alex Balashov
On 01/20/2016 11:01 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: But you reminded me that I should highlight again that private replies to mailing discussions are unlikely to be followed, going in the common folder (no longer filtered by mailing list rules), where I have a lot of unsolicited emails and I

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 20/01/16 16:48, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 01/20/2016 02:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> can you send the reply you got to the CANCEL? I am interested mainly in >> the parameters of Via header. > > Thanks, Daniel. I sent it to you privately. > > Just about to look at it

Re: [SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

2016-01-20 Thread Alex Balashov
On 01/20/2016 02:52 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, can you send the reply you got to the CANCEL? I am interested mainly in the parameters of Via header. Thanks, Daniel. I sent it to you privately. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Su

[SR-Users] A new edition of Kamailio Development Workshop

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, last edition of Kamailio Development Workshop happened about three years ago. As I got requests about it from time to time, I thought of trying to organize a new edition. Rather short term by now due to various constraints, so the plan is to do it again in Alicante, Spain, during February 1

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS deployment

2016-01-20 Thread Ramya Y
Hi Franz we have tried with different interfaces(eth0(10.0.0.9),eth1(10.0.0.10),eth2(10.0.0.11),eth3(10.0.0.12) for P/I/S ,but facing below error. root@server:/etc# kamailio -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(1630

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: Kamailio and NAT

2016-01-20 Thread Nelson Migliaro
>From what I saw, Nat´d por does not change. It always use 52548. Questions: 1 - In order to get rport, as you mentioned, i can use transformation. ¿What variable / pseudovariable I can use to get a string that contains rport? 2 - After I get that info, what would be the best way to insert that

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.2.6 crash

2016-01-20 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
Hello Daniel, Unfortunately not. Especially because I don't know how to reproduce the issue. Regards, Igor. De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 19 janvier 2016 19:03 À : Igor Potjevlesch ; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' Objet : Re: [SR-Us

[SR-Users] Presence: Notify on publication status refresh

2016-01-20 Thread Aleš Šturm
Hi all, I am using Kamailio 4.3 as Presence server and I have a question regarding NOTIFY messages sent after publication status refresh. When PUA sends refreshing PUBLISH request (before expiration) Kamailio sends NOTIFY request. Large number of watchers per one presentity causes large traf

[SR-Users] kamailio_call_disconnecting issue

2016-01-20 Thread yasir ay
Hello, Hi team I have a kamailio SIP server for call Routing,my call flow is like VoipDialer--->Kamailio-Routing Server-->Softswitch-->Telco/PSTN Mobile caller--->calle Now Am facing an issue for a call from voip to telco after

[SR-Users] RFC: removing (disabling) fork=no

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, wondering if anyone is using fork=no -- some old docs suggest it is suitable for debugging, but actually kamailio doesn't work properly in this mode, leading to more troubles than benefits (e.g., having reports of invalid issues, like tcp not working in this mode). In first phase I would d

[SR-Users] Freezing the development for next major version 4.4

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, as a follow up to previous discussions on the mailing list, I would like to propose Wednesday, Feb 3, 2016 as the day to freeze the development for next major release. It will allow the people going at Fosdem to chat and do last minute tunings before freezing. Other suggestions or comments