Re: [SR-Users] htable never

I have not been able to tesr yet, but it may be that the htable entries that were added in event route disapeared because of htable reload. If so, it Would be nice if enent route would be re-run or if it would be possible to prevent reload affecting entries that do not originate from db. Juha > H

Re: [SR-Users] Questions about LCR

Downgraded to 4.3.3 and changed some values in the lcr tables - now everything is working. This is my first experience with Kamailio and it is sooo exciting!!! you guys are great! --Scott On 10/07/2015 06:13 PM, Scott Fertig wrote: In my haste I totally forgot to include the error I am ge

Re: [SR-Users] rfc: event route when kamailio starts

> More or less what I want to ask here is whether the forking of the other > children should wait until the event_route[core:worker-one-init] is > finished (e.g., what is done in this event route is important before any > sip packet is routed) or just leave it like it is. I need htable initialize

Re: [SR-Users] Lost 180 Ringing Response

Hello, look at: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.p.cancel_b_method Maybe one or another value for that parameter is suiting better your use case. Cheers, Daniel On 07/10/15 23:27, John Billings wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We are using Kamailio 4.2.0 with TLS. It’s setup

Re: [SR-Users] Questions about LCR

In my haste I totally forgot to include the error I am getting, it appears that no gateways are being loaded (from what I can see in my sipcapture), the INVITE occurs but I get a general failure which is the message provided by the route I am guessing SIP/2.0 503 Service not available, no gate

[SR-Users] MySQL Connect Errors

We are using kamailio 4.2.0 with auth_db enabled and connected to a MySQL server. Occasionally, in the middle of the night when there is no activity we get the following errors out of the blue (the last three lines are repeated indefinitely). According to the MySQL site

[SR-Users] Lost 180 Ringing Response

Hi Everyone, We are using Kamailio 4.2.0 with TLS. It’s setup so multiple phones can register to the same account and they all ring together. It always works great unless one of the phones is on a slower Internet connection. Occasionally that phone will start ringing after another phone has al

[SR-Users] Questions about LCR

Hello, Sorry to bother and if I sound like a newb thats because I am kind of new (but im trying =) ) I am having some issues getting started using LCR and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction and/or let me know what I am doing wrong. I began setting up the other day u

[SR-Users] rfc: event route when kamailio starts

Hello, based on a recent discussion with Alex Balashov (at Kazoocon this week), I pushed a patch that enables the execution of event_route[core:worker-one-init] when kamailio is started. It would be more like an alternative for event_route[htable:mod-init], for the cases when htable is not used, b

Re: [SR-Users] uac_req_send and reply timeout

On 07/10/15 19:00, Paweł Sternal wrote: > On 07.10.2015 16:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in the event route for uac_req_send() is practically during handling the >> reply for what was sent before. Also, the uac_req_send() sends something >> out of the processed sip message,

Re: [SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

Can you add log_prefix to print the callid, message type (request/reply) and cseq header with each log message? That should reveal what sip message is processed when such case happens. I will look also at the code, maybe the stats are not decreased in such case. If the transactions are staying in

Re: [SR-Users] uac_req_send and reply timeout

On 07.10.2015 16:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, in the event route for uac_req_send() is practically during handling the reply for what was sent before. Also, the uac_req_send() sends something out of the processed sip message, so typically functions won't work because they will be a

Re: [SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

On Wednesday 07 October 2015 18:19:25 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > How many outgoing branches can there be? More than 12? I didn't configure this, so the default whatever that is. There are no explicit branches, the called trunk might have more that 1 AoR, so there may be parallel forks. Th

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog keep alive options are with error parsing headers

Hello Daniel, Do you have any suggestion how to resolve this issue? Best Regards José Seabra 2015-09-25 9:37 GMT+01:00 José Seabra : > Hello Daniel, > > Once again thank you for your support. > > Please check below the kamailio logs with your patch: > > 34(22654) DEBUG: [parser/msg_parser.c:60

Re: [SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

How many outgoing branches can there be? More than 12? Daniel On 07/10/15 18:07, Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2015 11:55:34 Alex Balashov wrote: >>> Accounting logged a BYE for all these calls. >> Was the BYE statefully processed? > All I can say, based on acc, is it was proce

Re: [SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

On Wednesday 07 October 2015 11:55:34 Alex Balashov wrote: > > Accounting logged a BYE for all these calls. > > Was the BYE statefully processed? All I can say, based on acc, is it was processed. But maybe not according to this logs: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:755]: add_uac(): ERROR: add_uac: maximum

Re: [SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

On 10/07/2015 11:48 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote: Accounting logged a BYE for all these calls. Was the BYE statefully processed? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954

[SR-Users] TM not ending transactions

Running 4.3.x (both .1 and .2) I have seen it happening twice sofar that dialogs (the module) will not end, resulting in to calls failing due to call limits based on active dialogs. Accounting logged a BYE for all these calls. kamcmd tm.stats shows an increasing number of current/waiting transa

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis debug window

testproxy.php is not from siremis, could be just some bot -- there is a different ip of the client fetching it compared with the one for siremis. Cheers, Daniel On 07/10/15 05:03, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > The /var/log/apache2/other_vhosts_access.log says > " > 10.0.0.4:80 91.196.50

Re: [SR-Users] uac_req_send and reply timeout

Hello, in the event route for uac_req_send() is practically during handling the reply for what was sent before. Also, the uac_req_send() sends something out of the processed sip message, so typically functions won't work because they will be applied to the processed sip message. Maybe try setting

Re: [SR-Users] SIREMIS Help

Hello, what exactly would you like to learn? Siremis is a fronted for several modules in kamailio, practically would require to know what that module does and what input needs in order to manage it via siremis. You can look at the readme of the module inside kamailio to understand the purpose of e

[SR-Users] SIREMIS Help

Hi, Just wanted to see how to get SIREMIS user manaual? Regards, Voyimir [image: me]*Vojimir Raovic*, Principal Engineer & Co-founder *Office:* +61 8 9200 3500 | *Web:* www.norwoodsystems.com | *Twitter: * @norwoodsystems *Direct:* +61 8 9200 3503 | *Mobile:*

[SR-Users] Recall: Kamailio B2BUA or Dual router ?

Mark Henriksen would like to recall the message, "[SR-Users] Kamailio B2BUA or Dual router ?". <>___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio B2BUA or Dual router ?

Yes I understand that with 2 interfaces, but I am looking for 1 interface with multiple IP’s (ipv4) assigned to that interface, can’t seem to get the logic for Kamailio on knowing what in or out depending on IP ? Basically I have this SIP Client ßà Kamailio Proxy w/RTpproxy