Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL log on kamailio startup

2015-09-04 Thread Nuno Reis
Hi Daniel. Thanks for answering me. I took a look on the loadmodule lines again as you suggested and found out I was indeed having a dependency situation which is now fixed. All OK now. Thanks again. Cheers, -- *Nuno Miguel Reis* | *Unified Communication** Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nr...@wav

[SR-Users] Topoh configuration question

2015-09-04 Thread Asgaroth
Hi all, I have a quick question with regards the topoh module, is it possible to have the topoh module only operate on a particular interface and direction. I have some edge proxies and I am trying out the topoh module, what I see happen is that messages originating from behind/inside the edg

Re: [SR-Users] Best practise for limiting concurrent calls across a cluster

2015-09-04 Thread José Seabra
Hi, I'm also using the same mechanism that Carsten is using(htable and DMQ), the only issue about this solution is when one of your kamailio instances goes down and up, this instance looses the number of current calls. Regards José Seabra 2015-09-04 13:53 GMT+01:00 Daniel Tryba : > On Friday

Re: [SR-Users] Best practise for limiting concurrent calls across a cluster

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Friday 04 September 2015 10:56:21 Carsten Bock wrote: > i did implement such mechanism once using a htable and DMQ, that > worked like a charm. Sound good, my current solution misses concurrent call setup that happen withing the dialog db_update_period timeout. ___

Re: [SR-Users] Route all traffic from Kamailio to FreeSWITCH after inital checks...

2015-09-04 Thread Michael Nielsen
I would end up with 2 or more PBX's... On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Friday 04 September 2015 14:30:34 Michael Nielsen wrote: > > My initial thought is to, right after route(pstn); to put: > > route(DISPATCHER); > > > > and then have, right after the route[relay] block

Re: [SR-Users] Route all traffic from Kamailio to FreeSWITCH after inital checks...

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Friday 04 September 2015 14:30:34 Michael Nielsen wrote: > My initial thought is to, right after route(pstn); to put: > route(DISPATCHER); > > and then have, right after the route[relay] block: > > route[DISPATCHER] { > if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { > send_reply("404", "No destination")

Re: [SR-Users] Route all traffic from Kamailio to FreeSWITCH after inital checks...

2015-09-04 Thread Michael Nielsen
My initial thought is to, right after route(pstn); to put: route(DISPATCHER); and then have, right after the route[relay] block: route[DISPATCHER] { if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } route(RELAY); exit; } Would that do it? On Fri, Sep 4, 201

[SR-Users] Route all traffic from Kamailio to FreeSWITCH after inital checks...

2015-09-04 Thread Michael Nielsen
I'm running the standard Debian 7 Kamailio 4.3 package. I've added the following to my kamailio.cfg: #!define WITH_MYSQL #!define WITH_AUTH #!define WITH_USRLOCDB #!define WITH_NAT #!define WITH_TLS #!define WITH_ANTIFLOOD After authentication, nat etc. is done is there an easy way to tran

Re: [SR-Users] Sounds works differently on different clients.

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Friday 04 September 2015 10:49:57 Michael Nielsen wrote: > Yes. Than you should make packetcaptures on the rptproxy to see where the missing rtp leg is going to. If it is send to the correct ip/port without any feedback that that combo is unreachable the problem is at the receiving endpoint.

Re: [SR-Users] Best practise for limiting concurrent calls across a cluster

2015-09-04 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, i did implement such mechanism once using a htable and DMQ, that worked like a charm. Thanks, Carsten 2015-09-04 10:54 GMT+02:00 Daniel Tryba : > On Friday 04 September 2015 10:15:29 Daniel Tryba wrote: >> But isn't the easiest/best solution to just use sqlops to count the number >> of dial

Re: [SR-Users] Best practise for limiting concurrent calls across a cluster

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Friday 04 September 2015 10:15:29 Daniel Tryba wrote: > But isn't the easiest/best solution to just use sqlops to count the number > of dialogs for the current endpoints? > select count(id) from dialog where xdata like > '"name":"maxchannels","value":"$dlg_var(key)"' > where the dialog var con

Re: [SR-Users] Sounds works differently on different clients.

2015-09-04 Thread Michael Nielsen
Yes. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Thursday 03 September 2015 19:19:44 Michael Nielsen wrote: > > Is it something to do with codec or could it be something else? > > Are you using an rtp proxy? > > ___ > SIP Express Router (

Re: [SR-Users] Sounds works differently on different clients.

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Thursday 03 September 2015 19:19:44 Michael Nielsen wrote: > Is it something to do with codec or could it be something else? Are you using an rtp proxy? ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-ro

Re: [SR-Users] Best practise for limiting concurrent calls across a cluster

2015-09-04 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Friday 04 September 2015 10:19:07 jay binks wrote: > Initially I mis-read the dialog module documentation and assumed that > dialog would provide me this ability, when used with a database. however > it seems that the dialog module does not pull data from the DB after the > initial startup. A