On Friday 22 May 2015 18:30:06 NITESH BANSAL wrote:
> I noticed that Kamailio adds a Server header in the replies generated by
> it, is there anyway to disable it?
server_signature=no
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mail
Hello,
I noticed that Kamailio adds a Server header in the replies generated by it,
is there anyway to disable it?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Nitesh
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
On 22/05/15 15:31, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>>> in order to avoid confusion, perhaps it should list in which modes the
>>> variable has effect.
>>>
>> Add anything that is relevant to docs. The feature came via a patch from
>> the community, iirc -- maybe the docs
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> > in order to avoid confusion, perhaps it should list in which modes the
> > variable has effect.
> >
> Add anything that is relevant to docs. The feature came via a patch from
> the community, iirc -- maybe the docs were not clear as the commit comments.
i cann
On 22/05/15 14:53, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>>> Just to make sure, does handle_lost_tcp now work also in DB-Only mode?
>>>
>> IIRC, the intitial implementation was based on iterating through the
>> records in memory and checking if the associated connection still
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> > Just to make sure, does handle_lost_tcp now work also in DB-Only mode?
> >
> IIRC, the intitial implementation was based on iterating through the
> records in memory and checking if the associated connection still
> exists. It is in the same iteration to detec
On 21/05/15 20:27, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> On the other hand, usrloc has option to remove the location record when
>> the tcp connection is detected to be closed. This might give you pretty
>> much what you need.
> Just to make sure, does handle_lost_tcp now w
Thanks Daniel, adding r2=on seems to have fixed the issue.
> From: d.tr...@pocos.nl
> To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:10:49 +0200
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] issues with domain names in the record route
>
> On Thursday 21 May 2015 18:27:13 NITESH BANSAL wrote:
> > Rout
Have tested it on virtual and physical. Works well, no need to patch for VM or
advertised address. Had no complaints from users with 1.2 and none since 2.0
Installed from git for testing.
-- Fred
> On May 22, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Klaus Darilion
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I just found out that ther
On 22.05.2015 10:37, Klaus Darilion wrote:
I just found out that there is a new rtpproxy release:
http://www.rtpproxy.org/post/v2release/
Has anybody tested it and want to share some experiences? Or have people
turned to rtpengine meanwhile? (I am still using rtpproxy 1.2 as I do
not need new
Hi!
I just found out that there is a new rtpproxy release:
http://www.rtpproxy.org/post/v2release/
Has anybody tested it and want to share some experiences? Or have people
turned to rtpengine meanwhile? (I am still using rtpproxy 1.2 as I do
not need new features).
regards
Klaus
___
On Thursday 21 May 2015 18:27:13 NITESH BANSAL wrote:
> Route: ,
...
> What can i do to avoid this problem, i need kamailio to recognize that
> "xyz.com" is kamailio as i have a defined an alias in the config file too
> as follows:
> alias=xyz.com:5060
Just a guess:
tls implies 5061, try adding x
12 matches
Mail list logo
