Hi Ethan,
What memcached library are you using with kamailio ?What version is you
kamailio ?I am sure that the memcached module is working with kamailio 4.0.2 .
Regards,Dragos
From: Ethan Brooks
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:29 AM
Subject: [SR-Users] m
Hi all, just an info for the sake of completness..
I just found out, that the problem was with Linphone clients and their
non-standard ICE implementation.
According to the statements of Belledonne Communications their ICE works
only with their own sip servers.
To be sure I just used completely di
Hi all!
I can't make my Kamailio to correctly relay stateful ACKs for 200
OK. It takes URI from Route: header and trying relay it to itself
instead of sending it to host sent 200 OK.
I don't understand why it can't match transaction and relay to correct host.
Seems BYEs aren't relayed correctly
On Thursday 16 April 2015 17:15:16 Cezary Siwek wrote:
> Try setting weight of all your SRV records to 0.
Was 1, setting to 0 appears circumvent the problem but also impacts load
balancing itself: no loadbalancing is being done. The 1 target to be used
appears to be generated from the SRV list
Can someone help me please …
I am using this setup . Sipml5 webrtc client(chrome) -> Kamailio with
RTP engine --> ThridpartySip Server
kamalio will act as mediator between webRTC client and NonWebRTC sip server
.
User will be registered on sip server and calls will be terminated to
PS
Hey,
Try setting weight of all your SRV records to 0.
Regards,
Cezary
On 16/04/2015 16:42, Daniel Tryba wrote:
The idea is to use SRV records instead of a dispatcher by setting $rd to a DNS
SRV enabled host (with all hosts having the same prio and weight).
Problem is that when authenticatio
The idea is to use SRV records instead of a dispatcher by setting $rd to a DNS
SRV enabled host (with all hosts having the same prio and weight).
Problem is that when authentication is required the flow is as follows (with 2
hosts):
1:
UAC INVITE/REGISTER -> LB -> SIP0
SIP0 401 with nonce1 chal
Yes I did, I am loading the mediaproxy.so module now instead of rtpproxy.so, I
am setting the modparam sock for rtpengine to the locally running instance of
rtpengine.. and in the "general routing logic" of kamailio.cfg I am calling
rtpengine_manage(), where there was rtpproxy_manage() before.
D
On Thursday 16 April 2015 14:08:56 Filip Malenka wrote:
> thanks for your answer. I just switched from rtpproxy to rtpengine, like
> you mentioned. It works the usual way (RTP proxied over server) and to
> me it appears exactly the same as rtpproxy, am I right? Is there any
> major difference betwe
Hi Juha,
thanks for your answer. I just switched from rtpproxy to rtpengine, like
you mentioned. It works the usual way (RTP proxied over server) and to
me it appears exactly the same as rtpproxy, am I right? Is there any
major difference between them?
It didn't solve my problem though. I am expe
Hello,
a reminder that in one week the development will be frozen. Anyone that
has new features intended to be in 4.3 has to hurry up.
I noticed 3 new modules in various branches and another one was
discussed on github tracker, it would be good to merge them before
starting the testing period.
C
Hi,
What are the statistics that should be used to monitor a Kamailio instance?
I currently looked at shmem_real_used_size, shmem_used_size,
dialogs_active_dialogs. However, I'm looking for other statistics that
represent the load on the instance.
Thanks,
Mickael
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
