[SR-Users] Reg. invalid cseq error.

2015-04-02 Thread Badri Ranganathan
Hi all, I make calls towards the Kamailio from my call generator and I get a message saying "invalid cseq error" sometimes at the 1005th registration or sometimes at the 1013thregistration, but the cseq number seems to be fine. Any idea about why this would happen? Thanks, Badri. ___

[SR-Users] Kamailio v4.2.4 Released

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v4.2.4 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 4.2, that includes fixes since release of v4.2.3. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on installations of v4.2.x. Deploymen

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog based CDRs and failed dialogs

2015-04-02 Thread Mickael Marrache
Yes, the duration is set to 0. From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 3:59 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialog based CDRs and failed dialogs Hello, On 02/04/15

Re: [SR-Users] Upgrade from Sip Express Router 0.9.6

2015-04-02 Thread Andres
On 4/2/15 8:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 02/04/15 14:29, Andres wrote: On 4/1/15 11:10 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: How complex is the SER configuration? SER couldn't do that much, by the standards of the modern feature set, so there may not be much to port. :-) It is very simple.

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog based CDRs and failed dialogs

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 02/04/15 14:36, Mickael Marrache wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using the ACC module to generate dialog based CDRs and I see that > CDRs are generated even for failed calls. > > > > For example, a CDR is generated for cancelled calls. > > > > At first, I thought that dialog based CDRs

Re: [SR-Users] Upgrade from Sip Express Router 0.9.6

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 02/04/15 14:29, Andres wrote: > On 4/1/15 11:10 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >> How complex is the SER configuration? SER couldn't do that much, by >> the standards of the modern feature set, so there may not be much to >> port. :-) > It is very simple. I am more concerned about the procedure to

[SR-Users] Dialog based CDRs and failed dialogs

2015-04-02 Thread Mickael Marrache
Hi, I'm using the ACC module to generate dialog based CDRs and I see that CDRs are generated even for failed calls. For example, a CDR is generated for cancelled calls. At first, I thought that dialog based CDRs are generated only for successfully established dialogs but it doesn't seem

Re: [SR-Users] Upgrade from Sip Express Router 0.9.6

2015-04-02 Thread Andres
On 4/1/15 11:10 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: How complex is the SER configuration? SER couldn't do that much, by the standards of the modern feature set, so there may not be much to port. :-) It is very simple. I am more concerned about the procedure to migrate the thousands of mysql entries from

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio coredump when "INVITE" enter in failure route

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, thanks for testing and reporting back. The patch has been backported and will be part of the v4.2.4 to be released today. Cheers, Daniel On 02/04/15 13:53, José Seabra wrote: > Hello Daniel, > After apply your patch i can't reproduce the issue anymore > > Thank your for your support > > C

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio coredump when "INVITE" enter in failure route

2015-04-02 Thread José Seabra
Hello Daniel, After apply your patch i can't reproduce the issue anymore Thank your for your support Cheers José Seabra 2015-03-30 9:58 GMT+01:00 José Seabra : > Hello Daniel, > Thank you for your patch, > > I will apply this, then I will report back to you when I have all tests > completed > >

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Announcement: Kamailio is now systemd-rtc-server

2015-04-02 Thread Alex Balashov
On 04/02/2015 04:07 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 02/04/15 08:59, Olle E. Johansson wrote: In addition this also totally removes the need for tools like Icinga, Nagios and Monit. If something happens, your systemd kernel will simply call you. Yep, don't forget to call in first and

Re: [SR-Users] Make deb

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Do you see db_cassandra being compiled in the logs printed by 'make deb'? Cheers, Daniel On 02/04/15 03:37, jay binks wrote: > I have managed to confirm that "make deb" does not actually build > db_cassandra > but it does make a deb for it :) ( has changelog etc but no > db_cassandra.so file ) >

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Announcement: Kamailio is now systemd-rtc-server

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 02/04/15 08:59, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > On 01 Apr 2015, at 10:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Given it is a rather technical community around here, I would expected a >> bit of engineering approach when announcing the achievement. Shortly, >> here are some of the facts. >> >> Any

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine documentation error for forced rtpproxying?

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wednesday 01 April 2015 12:37:00 Richard Fuchs wrote: > To clarify: rtpengine doesn't insert any marks and doesn't check for any > marks that might be present. IOW it behaves as if the "force" flag is > always enabled. Silly me, I was focused on the forced being retreated as an illegal flag I

Re: [SR-Users] Planning to release Kamailio v4.2.4

2015-04-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, short reminder that v4.2.4 is planned for release later today. If there anything to commit in branch 4.2, do it before 12:00GMT. Afterwards, if there is something important, write first to sr-dev. Once the announcement is sent, then commits can go as usual. Cheers, Daniel On 27/03/15 15:5

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Announcement: Kamailio is now systemd-rtc-server

2015-04-02 Thread Olle E. Johansson
On 01 Apr 2015, at 10:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Given it is a rather technical community around here, I would expected a > bit of engineering approach when announcing the achievement. Shortly, > here are some of the facts. > > Any interaction with or inside systemd is now *simple*,