Re: [SR-Users] Deleted Domain

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the mailing list for iptel service is: - http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/services Cheers, Daniel On 16/03/15 17:14, Eric Fetty wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I accidently deleted my domain from iptel.org. I went to re-create my > account and it will not let me. > > > > Domain: king

Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, dialog_ng is more or less tailored for IMS modules, dialog module is still in use and very actual. If you are not using IMS module, you should try the dialog module. I haven't seen any issues for it lately and if there are, they will get fixed. Cheers, Daniel On 17/03/15 03:28, Shane Har

Re: [SR-Users] PKG and Shared Memory statistics

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 16/03/15 16:37, Dirk Teurlings Signet B.V. wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in > Kamailio. > > # kamctl stats shmem > > The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is > there any way to get the committed size of mem

Re: [SR-Users] 478/sl and 478/sm on BYE?

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Interesting with not going to manage_branch/manage_reply because I use them for bye to terminate rtp relay session. I still think there is something missing in the signaling to get all routed properly. Otherwise, haven't used sipml5 so far, only the jssip library for sip + webrtc. Cheers, Daniel

Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE

2015-03-16 Thread Shane Harrison
A little more information. In processing the INVITE request I generate an async charging request. That calls back with the result of that charging request in a separate route block. It is there that the INVITE continues to be processed. I am guessing that the dialog_ng adds the DID to the RR

[SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE

2015-03-16 Thread Shane Harrison
Hi all, Have found a few threads on this before which have clarified my understanding a little but not yet presented me with a solution. I am using dialog_ng. dlg_manage() is deprecated and as per the documentation, I am simply setting a dialog flag early in the request_route. Kamctl dialog

Re: [SR-Users] [RTPproxy] Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Announcing rtpproxy v2.0.0

2015-03-16 Thread Zheng Frank
Do you mean ROHC ? 2015-03-14 12:39 GMT+08:00 Maxim Sobolev : > Do you have any particular RFC in mind? > On Mar 12, 2015 10:28 AM, "John Mathew" > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Maxim, >> Is there any plans for rtp header compression in future. I can't see >> anything in the change log for 2.0.0 >> >> >

[SR-Users] Deleted Domain

2015-03-16 Thread Eric Fetty
Hi, I accidently deleted my domain from iptel.org. I went to re-create my account and it will not let me. Domain: kingfetty.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://list

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS: can not register

2015-03-16 Thread dfretes
Hi Carsten, I must apologize for taking so long to respond... I'm very sorry... and for your help, thanks so much! Like you suspect, the problem was the DNS: the IPs was ok, the names too, but, what a fool! I put wrong ports, change that and everything work OK! Now I'm having another problem

Re: [SR-Users] PKG and Shared Memory statistics

2015-03-16 Thread Olle E. Johansson
On 16 Mar 2015, at 16:37, Dirk Teurlings Signet B.V. wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in > Kamailio. > > # kamctl stats shmem > > The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is there any > way to get the committed siz

Re: [SR-Users] 478/sl and 478/sm on BYE?

2015-03-16 Thread Don Fanning
I think I resolved it by removing the BYE and UPDATE from the conditional that goes towards manage_branch/manage_relay. Now to just sort out my 603 error with sipML5. You wouldn't happen to know of a way to force clients to reset their SIP stack state? I'm having the problem of the second call

[SR-Users] PKG and Shared Memory statistics

2015-03-16 Thread Dirk Teurlings Signet B.V.
Hi, We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in Kamailio. # kamctl stats shmem The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is there any way to get the committed size of memory for each of the PKG_MEMORY pools? If not, could this be added at

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Abdul Gafar
Hello Just modify RURI, t_relay(), and a new branch will automatically be created On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route? > > Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what > actions from kamailio.cf

Re: [SR-Users] Interoperability issues with older SIP clients

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it is possible to remove and add headers are needed. Storing and retrieving values is possible with htable or dialog vars or external storage (sql/nosql). Also, From/To headers can be changed and restored using header parameters, so nothing has to be stored locally. To be able to give more

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Are you calling t_relay() from branch_route? Maybe you should load debugger module and enable cfgtrace to see what actions from kamailio.cfg are executed. Just changing the $ru and relaying should work when used in request_route. Cheers, Daniel On 16/03/15 14:14, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > I me

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
I mean that algorithm of creating new headers of creating INVOTE message is the same for branch_branch route and single client. Only one difference i that I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:} vs append_branch("sip:$tU@ $(du{s.select,1,:})") This is full algo of my reqest the first is I chec

[SR-Users] Interoperability issues with older SIP clients

2015-03-16 Thread Magnus Nordström
Hi, We got interoperability issues with older SIP-clients. When e.g. some parameters are included in the SIP header Record-Route the call does not get connected. Now we are looking for a solution for that. We are using kamailio as SIP-registrar/proxy and would like to know if we can keep the

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
request_route 2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > > If I use > > $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:}); > > if (!t_relay()) { >

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or other routing block? Cheers, Daniel On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > If I use > > $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:}); > > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > } > > I see > > t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no

Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value

2015-03-16 Thread Slava Bendersky
Hello Daniel, I want do clean up on routes from first SUBSCRIBE, that when traffic goes to public side of kamailio will be only public route and when traffic is internal the Record-Route will stay internal only. In SDP I see like this. I tired double routes set 0 in rr, but didn't clean enough.

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
If I use $ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:}); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } I see t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly so

Re: [SR-Users] does ipops module dns_int_match_ip(hostname, ipaddr) search all returned records?

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 12/03/15 17:51, canuck15 wrote: > I am reading the documentation for the ipops module dns_int_match_ip() > function and it states the following: > > "Returns TRUE if ipaddr is associated by DNS to hostname. FALSE > otherwise. It uses internal DNS resolver. At this moment, the function >

Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you give an example of incoming header and how you want to be after modification? It is not clear for me what end result you want/expect. Cheers, Daniel On 14/03/15 06:41, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma. > M

Re: [SR-Users] What does it mean when auth_check and auth_challenge flags are "0"?

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 14/03/15 18:00, canuck15 wrote: > I am trying to decipher a kamailio.cfg file for a particular open > source project. > > There are problems with authentication and I am trying to understand why. > > They use the following lines for authentication check > > if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscr

Re: [SR-Users] 478/sl and 478/sm on BYE?

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you paste here the BYE request? It should be routed via alias parameter or some other header in order to make it via a websocket connection, because the contact over websocket is just some random string. Typical config is to use set_contact_alias() for INVITE and handle_ruri_alias() for

Re: [SR-Users] seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, instead of seturi use: $ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:}); Cheers, Daniel On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > Now. when I use > > seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); > > I see error at my log > > ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Freeswitch TCP call origination

2015-03-16 Thread Charles Chance
Hello, Since you are sharing location database, you might consider using Path. Cheers, Charles On 15 Mar 2015 08:52, "Niraj Roy" wrote: > Hi, >Here is the setup I have configured. > --Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer > -- Three freeswitch works as the me

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Freeswitch TCP call origination

2015-03-16 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Saturday 14 March 2015 19:05:36 Niraj Roy wrote: > User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)Kamailio(K1)--->User B. > Since User B is registered with K2. K1 being a public server won't be able > to initiate any call to User B because there is no TCP connection > established with it. > Ca