Subject: [SR-Users] Any suggestion if I just want to update one or some
modules? Date: Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:48:46AM +0800 Quoting jack wang
(antira...@gmail.com):
> Is there more efficient way for just updating the specified module ??
FWIW, I did exactly that, on FreeBSD:
cd srcpath/modu
I found it's work if I make under the specified module directory...
but still can not figure out why it gets error if under the main directory.
2015-03-04 11:48 GMT+08:00 jack wang :
> For example,
> If I modify only the registrar module,
> I thought the steps were:
>
> 1. make modules=modules\r
just an idea, will it work if i used subst_hf?
Kelvin Chua
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We need to review this in rr.
>
> Meanwhile you can use s.substr transformation to get whats after sips and
> prefix it with sip in r-uri.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
For example,
If I modify only the registrar module,
I thought the steps were:
1. make modules=modules\registrar modules
2. copy the registrar.so to the installed path
And when starting kamailio I got the error message below:
ERROR: [sr_module.c:417]:
version_control(): ERROR: module compile fla
Hi Guys
I want to archive this setup
Kamailio to switch called number and the switch to be hidden from the client so
there should be no mention of the switched number
in any of the messages back to the client.
for example
phone client calls "alex"
kamailio to switch "alex" to "54321" and send t
Hello all,
I would like to setup a DMQ bus where servers can come on and offline and
have DMQ continue working with the online servers. I'm having trouble
understanding how to do that with the notification address. Can someone
point me in the right direction?
More specifically, suppose I have f
On 03/03/2015 12:48 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
This is an amazing community.
Thank you, we try.
But in all fairness, you are also the ideal newbie; you're asking very
specific, defined questions that have specific, detailed answers, so
it's easy to help you.
Sometimes newbies show up and
Will need to read a bit more to understanding it completely, but I think I
get the gist. Thanks again.
This is an amazing community.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:40 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
> BTW, Daniel - one point in your reply to Alex caught m
On 03/03/2015 12:40 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
BTW, Daniel - one point in your reply to Alex caught my attention "I
don't allow client EPs to do redirects"... perhaps this is very simply,
but how is this prohibited ?
This is something that is baked into the logic of your routing, i.e.
don't a
Thanks again Alex, pretty clear - I suppose.
BTW, Daniel - one point in your reply to Alex caught my attention "I don't
allow client EPs to do redirects"... perhaps this is very simply, but how
is this prohibited ?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 March 2015
On 03/03/2015 12:38 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
BTW I don't allow client endpoints to do redirects, I only accept this from my
redirecters so I'm not concerned about strange headers not handled by my
subst.
I understand. But it's still not "formally correct" because it captures
only one of the ma
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 18:31:13 Alex Balashov wrote:
> > $var(contact) = $(var(contact){re.subst,/^<(sip:\+?
> >
> > [0-9]+@.*)>$/\1/});
>
> I would recommend, from a best-practical perspective, not doing this
> substitution, but instead using transformations[1] to extract the
On 03/03/2015 12:32 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
Would Kamilio also take care to send out the ACK to end the trasaction
with B-party, and continue the relayed transaction with C-party ?
Indeed it will.
Is this, in effect same as serial forking ?
It is not only in effect the same as serial fo
Thanks Daniel, couldn't have asked for more.
Daniel and Alex, one further question... (theoretical, since I'm yet to try
this out) -
Would Kamilio also take care to send out the ACK to end the trasaction with
B-party, and continue the relayed transaction with C-party ?
Is this, in effect same as
On 03/03/2015 12:21 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
$var(contact) = $T_rpl($ct);
$var(contact) = $(var(contact){re.subst,/^<(sip:\+?
[0-9]+@.*)>$/\1/});
I would recommend, from a best-practical perspective, not doing this
substitution, but instead using transformatio
Thanks Alex.Wow, that was very fast.
I am new to Kamilio (and SIP in general), but a quick research tells that
I've to configure Kamilio to run in the transaction stateful mode, which in
turn brings down it's performance. Is that correct ?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
>
Thanks, that puts my performance worry to rest.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 12:08 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
> I am new to Kamilio (and SIP in general), but a quick research tells
>> that I've to configure Kamilio to run in the transaction stateful mo
> One thing I can see is that neither of the devices send a SUBSCRIBE with
> line-seize Event. They rather just subscribe to the call-info event, and
> in the oubound INVITE, they don't send a Call-Info header either. Is
> this mandatory for the SCA module to work?
It sounds like they're not confi
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 17:56:45 Jayanth Acharya wrote:
> Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be configured
> to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302 response from
> B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by the updated Contact
> URI) ?
No pro
On 03/03/2015 12:08 PM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
I am new to Kamilio (and SIP in general), but a quick research tells
that I've to configure Kamilio to run in the transaction stateful mode,
which in turn brings down it's performance. Is that correct ?
No, not really. :-) This is true, strictly
Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be configured
to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302 response from
B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by the updated Contact
URI) ?
Alternatively, is there a way for the B-party SIP UAS to get the proxy
On 03/03/2015 11:56 AM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be
configured to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302
response from B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by
the updated Contact URI) ?
Absolutely. You can
Hello Daniel,
Is notify should follow subscribe routes ?
Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me.
<--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 --->
SUBSCRIBE sip:10...@networklab.ca SIP/2.0
Record-Route:
Accept: application/simple-message-summary
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG
You will have to provide full sip trace of such call to see whats rlwrong
with routing.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
> I addes msg_apply_changes() but now kamailio dont send ACK message. I see
> that it only arrievs to kamailio.
>
> 2015-03-03 9:53 GMT+03:0
Hello,
We need to review this in rr.
Meanwhile you can use s.substr transformation to get whats after sips and
prefix it with sip in r-uri.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> Found the problem, on the 200 OK, I have this record route list
>
> Record-Route: IP>:605
I addes msg_apply_changes() but now kamailio dont send ACK message. I see
that it only arrievs to kamailio.
2015-03-03 9:53 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> remove_hf() removes the entire header, including its parameters.
>
> The issue here seems to be related to the fact that y
Found the problem, on the 200 OK, I have this record route list
Record-Route: :6056;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=as620b910c;did=242.fd92;nat=yes>.
Record-Route: :6055;r2=on;lr;ftag=as620b910c;did=242.fd92;nat=yes>.
Record-Route: :5080;lr=on;did=242.968>
the second entry is wrong. it should be sip:
27 matches
Mail list logo
