Re: [SR-Users] The "Subscriber" table VS the "Location" table ?!

2014-12-19 Thread Olle E. Johansson
On 19 Dec 2014, at 23:35, Mahmoud Ramadan Ali wrote: > Hi Dears, > I'm a little bit confused about the difference between the "Subscriber" table > and the "Location" table.I read that the "Location" table is used for > persistent user registration BUT i did NOT configured the "Location" table

Re: [SR-Users] The "Subscriber" table VS the "Location" table ?!

2014-12-19 Thread Muhammad Shahzad
The users in subscriber table are the actual users who are allowed to register to your SIP service. This is where kamailio gets the authentication information, e.g. username and password etc. The location table is where kamailio stores currently registered i.e. online users. Obviously the records

[SR-Users] The "Subscriber" table VS the "Location" table ?!

2014-12-19 Thread Mahmoud Ramadan Ali
Hi Dears, I'm a little bit confused about the difference between the "Subscriber" table and the "Location" table.I read that the "Location" table is used for persistent user registration BUT i did NOT configured the "Location" table and can get persistent user registration with the "Subscriber" tab

Re: [SR-Users] Can't start Kamailio with both db_postgres and tls

2014-12-19 Thread James Cloos
> "DM" == Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: DM> Can you elaborate? Otherwise I don't see what's the role of this reply, DM> because that was clear they want want tls for postgres. Apologies that I wasn't clear. DM> The error message says 'no pg_hba.conf entry for host "..."' -- sounds DM> li

Re: [SR-Users] Media trouble with kamailio/rtpengine

2014-12-19 Thread Marc Soda
Thanks for the response. You're right, the media stream is making it all the way back to my PC, I just don't hear anything. And yes, my speakers are turned up... I'm not sure what to try next... On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: > > On 12/19/14 10:47, Marc Soda wrote: > >

Re: [SR-Users] Media trouble with kamailio/rtpengine

2014-12-19 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/19/14 10:47, Marc Soda wrote: > I'm trying to use Kamailio and rtpengine as a webrtc gateway. I'm not > getting audio back to my browser. From a packet capture I can see media > from the browser to rtpengine, and then bi-directional RTP back and > forth from my asterisk server, but rtpengin

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/19/14 11:39, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Richard Fuchs writes: > >> I don't see how it would make a difference. If Firefox sends 0.0.0.0 and >> rtpengine replaces it with its own address, then the receiving client >> can send media to rtpengine, but rtpengine would have nowhere to forward >> it t

[SR-Users] Initial REGISTER request/response in 3rd Party Register

2014-12-19 Thread jyaim
Hello, I'm using Kamailio with a SIP Application Server, when a user registers on the IMS Core a 3rd Party REGISTER request is sent to the application server to start some logic. I'm trying to add in the 3rd party register request body the initial REGISTER request sent by user device, and the 200

Re: [SR-Users] Media trouble with kamailio/rtpengine

2014-12-19 Thread Marc Soda
Even stranger, I get a media stream back to the browser when I use Chrome (the first was with Firefox), but I still hear nothing. Also I get errors like this in the log: SRTP output wanted, but no crypto suite was negotiated Full output: https://gist.github.com/marcantonio/6c5414aa931a8f1c0072

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > I don't see how it would make a difference. If Firefox sends 0.0.0.0 and > rtpengine replaces it with its own address, then the receiving client > can send media to rtpengine, but rtpengine would have nowhere to forward > it to. After the answer, ICE processing may commence

[SR-Users] Media trouble with kamailio/rtpengine

2014-12-19 Thread Marc Soda
I'm trying to use Kamailio and rtpengine as a webrtc gateway. I'm not getting audio back to my browser. From a packet capture I can see media from the browser to rtpengine, and then bi-directional RTP back and forth from my asterisk server, but rtpengine is not sending the media on to the browser

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/19/14 10:02, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Richard Fuchs writes: > >> Yes I understand, but 1) the mechanism of using 0.0.0.0 to put a call on >> hold must remain operational and intact for those clients which use it, >> and 2) if the offering client sends 0.0.0.0 in the SDP, then the >> rewritten

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > Yes I understand, but 1) the mechanism of using 0.0.0.0 to put a call on > hold must remain operational and intact for those clients which use it, > and 2) if the offering client sends 0.0.0.0 in the SDP, then the > rewritten SDP should also contain 0.0.0.0, no matter what

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/19/14 09:33, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Richard Fuchs writes: > >> On 12/19/14 03:32, Juha Heinanen wrote: >>> i got mozilla to generate sdp with sendrecv, but still rtpengine does >>> not replace 0.0.0.0 address on o and c lines. why? >> >> Because 0.0.0.0 means steam is on hold and so should

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > On 12/19/14 03:32, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > i got mozilla to generate sdp with sendrecv, but still rtpengine does > > not replace 0.0.0.0 address on o and c lines. why? > > Because 0.0.0.0 means steam is on hold and so should be left in place. what i understand from rfc3

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-19 Thread Victor V. Kustov
Hi, DanB! Kamailio has radius accounting too. -- WBR, Victor I use FREE operation system: 3.15.9- GNU/Linux up 2 weeks, 1 day, 5 hours, 22 minutes ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-rout

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 12/19/14 03:32, Juha Heinanen wrote: > i got mozilla to generate sdp with sendrecv, but still rtpengine does > not replace 0.0.0.0 address on o and c lines. why? Because 0.0.0.0 means steam is on hold and so should be left in place. cheers ___ SIP

Re: [SR-Users] SIP Fragments

2014-12-19 Thread Marc Soda
That's how I ended up going. It's working now. Thanks. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:11 PM, James Cloos wrote: > > > "MS" == Marc Soda writes: > > MS> I'm having a problem reassembling UDP packets on my Asterisk servers > after > MS> passing through Kamailio > > You could try having the kama->

Re: [SR-Users] Can't start Kamailio with both db_postgres and tls

2014-12-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 18/12/14 22:09, James Cloos wrote: >> "DM" == Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > DM> The question would be more specific to the error message printed from > DM> postgres client library: > > DM> FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "129.240.1.1", user > DM> "foo_test_user", database " foo_

[SR-Users] Unregister is failing

2014-12-19 Thread Anil Kumar
Hi All, I am running ims servers(pcscf,scscf,icscf and hss) as part of kamailio proxy. And I am trying to register and unregister the end-points, with help osip lib. But I see the below ERROR message. ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[REGISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=90

[SR-Users] rtpengine returns 0.0.0.0 even with sendrecv in offer

2014-12-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
i got mozilla to generate sdp with sendrecv, but still rtpengine does not replace 0.0.0.0 address on o and c lines. why? -- juha Dec 19 10:20:18 box /usr/bin/sip-proxy[5841]: INFO: = rtpengine_offer(ICE=force replace-session-connection replace-origin via-branch=1) Dec 19 10:20:18 box rtpen