Re: [SR-Users] Checking documentation for v4.2

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Thanks, updated to use 4.2.x folder. The reason for 'devel' is that the wiki page is built during development period of each release, when it is referred as 'new-in-devel'. Before releasing a new major version, as we have the number for that version, the page content is moved in a page that uses t

[SR-Users] [AQT#20142122820] SIP Express Router Contact Header Buffer Overflow

2014-10-15 Thread Avodaq Service
Hi Daniel, as i know from customer, they use McAfee Network Security Manager Version 7.5.5.7. If you have further questions don't hesitate to contact me. Regards Kay Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kay Montag -- avodaq AG, Landsberger Str. 290, D-80687 München Tel.: +49.1803.78 63 78, E-Mail: serv...@

Re: [SR-Users] Checking documentation for v4.2

2014-10-15 Thread Corey Edwards
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/features/new-in-4.2.x This page has links to the devel version of the modules docs. Would it make more sense to link them to 4.2.x instead? The new-in-4.1.x page is the same way, so I don't know if there's a specific reason you linked to devel. Corey _

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Oct 15, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Ben Langfeld wrote: > On 15 October 2014 11:32, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Ben Langfeld writes: > > > I figure at this point it may be simpler to separate the registrar and the > > proxy rather than attempt to debug this further, though if you have any > > other sugge

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Ben Langfeld
On 15 October 2014 11:32, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Ben Langfeld writes: > > > I figure at this point it may be simpler to separate the registrar and > the > > proxy rather than attempt to debug this further, though if you have any > > other suggestions to avoid that I'd love to hear them. > > one p

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Juha Heinanen
Ben Langfeld writes: > I figure at this point it may be simpler to separate the registrar and the > proxy rather than attempt to debug this further, though if you have any > other suggestions to avoid that I'd love to hear them. one possibility is that both of your combined proxy/registrars have

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Ben Langfeld
On 15 October 2014 10:33, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > On 15/10/14 14:19, Ben Langfeld wrote: > >> Em 15/10/2014, às 07:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > escreveu: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >>> On 14/10/14 23:56, Ben Langfeld wrote: > >>> Hello everyone. I'm having a problem with registrations

Re: [SR-Users] SIP Express Router Contact Header Buffer Overflow

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, you are referring to something more than 7 years old. What version are you using? Meanwhile, many haven changed in ser and kamailio projects. Cheers, Daniel On 15/10/14 13:07, Kay Montag wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > my customer gets the following message. Find attached. > > > > I check

[SR-Users] SIP Express Router Contact Header Buffer Overflow

2014-10-15 Thread Kay Montag
Hi Team, my customer gets the following message. Find attached. I checked the provided link: http://www.iptel.org/ser/sercurity/secalert-002-0_8_10.patch But I get the error: "Page not found" Could you assist me with that issue? Regards Kay Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kay Montag -- avodaq AG, La

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Ben Langfeld
> Em 15/10/2014, às 07:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > escreveu: > > Hello, > >> On 14/10/14 23:56, Ben Langfeld wrote: >> Hello everyone. I'm having a problem with registrations and Path and hope >> that someone can help. >> >> I have a Kamailio instance which is both a WebSocket proxy and a

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 15/10/14 14:19, Ben Langfeld wrote: >> Em 15/10/2014, às 07:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> escreveu: >> >> Hello, >> >>> On 14/10/14 23:56, Ben Langfeld wrote: >>> Hello everyone. I'm having a problem with registrations and Path and hope >>> that someone can help. >>> >>> I have a Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] rtpengine upgrade fails

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 14/10/14 17:50, Richard Fuchs wrote: > On 10/14/14 04:08, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> On 13/10/14 18:07, Juha Heinanen wrote: >>> just to complete the thread, the dependency problem has been fixed and >>> upgrade from 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.5.0.0 to 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.6.0.0 succeeded >>> without issue

Re: [SR-Users] Group User Presence

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 14/10/14 12:05, rastrella wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've setup my kamailio more or less with all my needs, thanks to all your > helps :) > > Now I've a question regarding presence. > My kamailio manage all sip clients that are presents in my home. When I > receive call all my phone rings s

Re: [SR-Users] No need for Authentication... Why?

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 14/10/14 21:11, Manuel Camarg wrote: > > If you want to block that, you can change the config so only users with > >local domains are allowed to use the service. > Thanks Daniel, > Where shall I look in the docs to find info about this? It is a matter of config file, mainly the route[AUTH] --

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module and local paths

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 14/10/14 23:56, Ben Langfeld wrote: Hello everyone. I'm having a problem with registrations and Path and hope that someone can help. I have a Kamailio instance which is both a WebSocket proxy and a registrar which has the following behaviour: * A REGISTER with a Path header alread

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.4 slow memory leak

2014-10-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Thanks for reporting back. After 4.2.0 release I will try to get the time to release another 4.0.x version, to include this fix as well. Cheers, Daniel On 14/10/14 22:43, Heenan, Timothy Steven wrote: I’ve tested this patch pretty thoroughly. Afterwards, I’ve pushed it to our production envi

[SR-Users] Handle "MESSAGE" packet

2014-10-15 Thread Juha Heinanen
aawaise writes: > I want to know how kamailio server handles incoming MESSAGE packets of SIP > format ? > If a sender sends a MESSAGE packet for receiver, and receiver is offline, > how will server handle the packet. Can it hold the packet until the receiver > is online and then deliver to receive

[SR-Users] Handle "MESSAGE" packet

2014-10-15 Thread aawaise
I want to know how kamailio server handles incoming MESSAGE packets of SIP format ? If a sender sends a MESSAGE packet for receiver, and receiver is offline, how will server handle the packet. Can it hold the packet until the receiver is online and then deliver to receiver ?? -- View this messag