hi,
thanks for your reply. so what you are saying is active calls will continue
with the same server ? for example, lets say i have two entries in my
dispatcher.
10.1.1.110.1.1.2
There are already 10 active calls between my Kamailio and 10.1.1.1 and i just
removed 10.1.1.1 from dispatcher. So no
Hi,
the dispatcher module does not care about active calls when you remove
a destination. The calls and all related SIP-Signalling will simply
continue. This is handled by SIP-Loose Routing, not by the dispatcher
module. The dispatcher module manages only the initial decision, what
Server to take.
Hi,
I have a small question. If I remove a server from my dispatcher while it has
existing calls, what's gonna happen to the next notifications or requests of
the live calls. Will it send them to the same server even though the server is
not listed on the dispatcher. Or it will forward them to
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:54 PM, logikanet wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> I've been trying to install Kamailio on a Centos 6.5 cloud , I'm able to
> compile and install everything, if I run : service kamailio start it
> starts kamailio and if I run service kamailio status I tells me that is
> ru
Sorry for long answer. We added wrong proxy name at table. Resolved at ano
day, just not saw your reply until today. Thanks
2014-10-10 13:25 GMT+04:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> apparently you have a broken r-uri ($ru) or dst uri ($du), which seems to
> be an address without leading
Further more, "auto" mode with "restore_dlg=1" does automatically change
the From-uri for in-dialog requests, but not the From-display name.
Is this also intended?
Thanks
Klaus
On 10.10.2014 16:02, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that uac_replace_from does restore the original URI only
Hi!
It seems that uac_replace_from does restore the original URI only if the
>From URI is changed. Only changing the Display-name, eg:
uac_replace_from("$avp(pad)","");
does not add the RR-cookie, thus the original will not be restored (e.g.
on responses).
Is this on purpose or a bug?
re
I would prefer to have add_contact_alias deprecated and then dropped (less
confusing this way).
-ovidiu
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14 14:54, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>
> I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for someone
> not
On 10/10/14 14:54, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for
someone not familiar with kamailio to deal with it.
Maybe we should open a bug report to make presence *_contact_alias
friendly.
add_contact_alias() is not going to be (very easy) friendly, b
I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for someone
not familiar with kamailio to deal with it.
Maybe we should open a bug report to make presence *_contact_alias friendly.
-ovidiu
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if the prese
> Now to simulate this i have gone through all the mail chains or tutorials
> and anything which is available on net but till now not able to simulate
> the scenario successfully.
>
> Here is the output of usr_preferences table.
i know know about usr_preferences table, but once you have got the
Hi Daniel,
Actually I want to simulate unconditional/blind call forwarding scenario
with kamailio 4.1.6.
Call flow would be simple user A calls to user B and call get forwarded to
user C.
Now to simulate this i have gone through all the mail chains or tutorials
and anything which is available o
Hi ,
Now 483 too many hops is resolved, thanks for that.
But from server side 200 OK is missing for SUBSCRIBE, as well as NOTIFY.
May I know the reason ?
Thanks
Anil
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if you are using a domain in sip addresses, be
hello,
check that the carrierroute module is loaded as well as cr_next_domain()
has the appropriate number of parameters.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26/09/14 15:58, m...@brightvoip.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the carrierfailureroute table functionality via the
cr_next_domain carrierroute fun
Hello,
you have to provide the sip trace taken on kamailio server, capturing
the traffic on both sides. What you provided is missing any description
and ips of sender and receiver.
As a guess, if you don't get bye on kamailio, very likely you didn't do
record_route() for invite.
Cheers,
Da
Apparently these functions work when the dialog is established, more
like updating the timeout value that was set via avp. I will look over
the code and fix if that is an error. Maybe it is good to open an issue
on tracker, not to forget about.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 30/09/14 12:55, Jose Ferreira
Hello,
apparently you have a broken r-uri ($ru) or dst uri ($du), which seems
to be an address without leading 'sip:'. It could be because of config
file operations, not parameters.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02/10/14 01:13, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Hello. We use 2 kamailio behind load balanser that
Hello,
you have to provide the sip trace taken on kamailio (on both sides -
caller and callee), to be able to see what really happens there. If an
INVITE gets a CANCEL, then it is replied with 487 and the proxy has to
send an ACK. Kamailio doesn't send ACK for a 200ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/
Hello,
you can use sqlops to retrieve data from any database table, with the
structure you want. Then with append_branch() function and $branch(...)
variable, you have the options to add branches and update their specific
attributes with the values retrieved from database.
Cheers,
Daniel
On
Hello,
if the presence server is first hop after a nat router, then use
fix_natted_contact() for SUBSCRIBE requests instead of
add/set_contact_alias().
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/10/14 06:52, Thanh Truong wrote:
Hi all,
I have install kamailio 4.2 latest version with presence module.
But I cant
Hello,
if you are using a domain in sip addresses, be sure you have
alias=domain as global parameter in kamailio.cfg
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/10/14 09:27, Anil Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to register an ims-client/user to kamailio proxy, but I am
seeing 483 too many hops response.
I kn
Good evening!
I've been trying to install Kamailio on a Centos 6.5 cloud , I'm able
to compile and install everything, if I run : service kamailio start
it starts kamailio and if I run service kamailio status I tells me
that is running on PID... which is fine, however, if I tweak the
/usr/lo
Hi All,
I am trying to register an ims-client/user to kamailio proxy, but I am
seeing 483 too many hops response.
I know one of the reason for this, that is MAX-FORWARD limit has reached.
But in my case I feel I have given a proper value (70) , but still some
looping is happening in the middle
23 matches
Mail list logo
