Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage and ip addresses [SOLVED]

2014-06-13 Thread tonchek
SOLVED. Solution: r - flags that IP address in SDP should be trusted. Without this flag, rtpproxy ignores address in the SDP and uses source address of the SIP message as media address which is passed to the RTP proxy. Anton On 13 Jun 2014, at 21:44, tonc...@mac.com wrote: > HI to ALL! > >

[SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage and ip addresses

2014-06-13 Thread tonchek
HI to ALL! As I understand the logic of rpproxy_manage work, it uses packet source IP and port number from m= field of SDP as socket for rtpproxy process. So, we can see it in SIP and rtpproxy debug messages: IP 77.94.133.231.5060 > 77.94.133.232.5060: UDP, length 1170 [...headers stripped...]

Re: [SR-Users] inbound kamailio dispatcher faulty routing of ack after 200 OK

2014-06-13 Thread pa...@eremina.net
so, when you add dialog module your problem gone? 2014-06-12 20:14 GMT+06:00 Gijs Kwakkel : > that seems to work, (i did not add anything new for (has uri==myself)) > i'm not sure yet why this is working, so i will study it a bit more. > if this doesn't bring up new bugs, then my whole problem s

Re: [SR-Users] Unable to make calls within the extensions

2014-06-13 Thread Chandramouli P
Hello, Can anybody please respond? Any update would be appreciated. Thank you. Regards, Chandra. On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Chandramouli P wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to Kamailio. I started RTPProxy using "rtpproxy -A 54.85.12.15 -F > -l 10.0.0.122 -s udp:localhost:7722" command and s

Re: [SR-Users] Is t_on_failure with uac_req_send possible?

2014-06-13 Thread Ian Lin
Hello Daniel, Thanks for your quick response. I was using onreply_route[idx] {} block so it wasn't work and after changing to use default reply route and it works. Appreciated. Cheers, Ian On 13 June 2014 17:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > failure route is not executed fo

Re: [SR-Users] MSILO add on deliver event route still no joy

2014-06-13 Thread Roberto Fichera
On 06/11/2014 04:17 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: Hi Daniel, do you have an idea why I'm getting the issue below? Cheers, Roberto Fichera. > On 06/10/2014 12:40 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 06/10/2014 12:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> >>> On 10/06/14 10:37, R

Re: [SR-Users] Is t_on_failure with uac_req_send possible?

2014-06-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, failure route is not executed for local generated requests because it requires a transaction created by a network-received request. The response is getting in the default reply_route {} block, but it is not getting into tm specific onreply_route[X] {} blocks. Cheers, Daniel On 13/06