[SR-Users] reg event support in subscribe

Hi All, May I know whether kamailio supports event header with reg (EVENT:reg) (rfc 3680) , if kamailio supports may I know the module whether it is in presence or presence_xml or any other module? Regards, Prem Chandiran M ___ SIP Express Route

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio "ubuntu precise" repository DOWN

> Daniel wrote: > the old server with the repositories had to be shut down: > >   - http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2014-January/081347.html > > But the repositories were cloned to devel.kamailio.org and the dns was > pointed to them. > > Maybe Henning can check if the http paths

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

On 04 Feb 2014, at 18:58, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 02/04/2014 12:54 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > >> And you assume a lot of things - that your invites are sent to the same >> server, which may not be the case. DNS lookups and load balancing/failover >> is done on a per transaction basis. >

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio with mediaproxy-ng, 488 Not Acceptable Here

There are several problems that need to be addressed in your kamailio.cfg but let me try to focus only on mediaprxoy-ng related ones. First instead of engaging mediaproxy in failure route, engage it main route or branch route. Why wait for failure when we know call will fail anyway if you try to c

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

On 02/04/2014 12:54 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: And you assume a lot of things - that your invites are sent to the same server, which may not be the case. DNS lookups and load balancing/failover is done on a per transaction basis. In fairness, RFC 3578 does offer a fair bit of commentary on t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio "ubuntu precise" repository DOWN

Hello, the old server with the repositories had to be shut down: - http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2014-January/081347.html But the repositories were cloned to devel.kamailio.org and the dns was pointed to them. Maybe Henning can check if the http paths on the devel server m

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

Again, you are trying to break the SIP Protocol. Check RFC 3261 for references. There should only be one SIP invite open at a time. That's the reason the SIP community invented UPDATE. And you assume a lot of things - that your invites are sent to the same server, which may not be the case. DNS lo

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

Hi, nah, that's not what I wanted to hear ;). And it's not really complicated. I hacked it down (my third choice in the initial mail) with $shv(). See (find also attached): ### Hacky section xdbgl("Shared Variable of current ( Call-ID = $ci ) i

[SR-Users] kamailio as sip router and rtp proxy without reg on kamailio

hello all again. trying the third day... my cfg is: http://pastebin.com/vMHd7kki I need scheme like: any_sip_device_on_internet_nated_and_not => kamailio ext ip (194.190.8.171) | kamailio int ip (50.0.0.1) => asterisk (50.0.0.10) a do not need realtime configuration of asterisk. I only need forw

Re: [SR-Users] Change the name of the location table for the usrloc module

Thank you Alex for your quick reply! On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Alejandro, > > Plot twist! It's not a modparam. This is actually the 'domain' argument to > the save() function exported by the 'registrar' module: > >http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/

Re: [SR-Users] Change the name of the location table for the usrloc module

Alejandro, Plot twist! It's not a modparam. This is actually the 'domain' argument to the save() function exported by the 'registrar' module: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/registrar.html#idp1965144 "domain - Logical domain within registrar. If database is used then thi

[SR-Users] Change the name of the location table for the usrloc module

Hi everybody, I have been trying to setup a new installation of kamailio, and I need the user location table to have a specific name. This will allow two kamailio servers to use the same database for their registry information. I cannot find any modparam in the documentation that allows me to set

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

I'm not sure this is a task for a proxy like Kamailio, even with its fancy new async relay features. To truly customise how successive INVITEs are dealt with like this, I think it needs to be handled by a UAS that has complete latitude in terms of how it computes state. On 4 February 2014 10:

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

Hi, sure. That's why it's called "transaction oriented". On a SIP-Theory basis, the second INVITE opens a new transaction!! For correlation the Call-ID keeps the same! This is how all of the big carriers I know handle OverlapDialing. The problem is: * I am receiving an INVITE. * At this point I d

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

Indeed, Section 3.1 in the referenced RFC covers this pretty well. On 4 February 2014 09:47:38 GMT-05:00, "Olle E. Johansson" wrote: > >On 04 Feb 2014, at 15:43, Moritz Graf wrote: > >> >> Shortly explained what RFC3578 is: In a open numbering plan you never >> know if the INVITE you received

Re: [SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

On 04 Feb 2014, at 15:43, Moritz Graf wrote: > > Shortly explained what RFC3578 is: In a open numbering plan you never > know if the INVITE you received is already complete, or if there are > more numbers coming in. One way of accomplishing this is to set up a > timer. If the timer elapses you

[SR-Users] Handling RFC3578 (Overlap Dialing) in Kamailio/ Asynchronious transaction handling

Hoho, i want to implement RFC3578 (transaction oriented) in Kamailio. Therefore I have to correlate two different Invites with same Call-ID. I see various ways of accomplishing this, but I am stuck at all of my solutions. Find the algorithm I want to implement attached. Shortly explained what RFC

[SR-Users] websocket relay

Hi Everyone, I want kamailio to do a single task, that is relay incoming (webrtc sip over websockets) connections to asterisk. All sip handling is to be done is asterisk. I have configured asterisk with tls settings. My sample conf file is below At the moment I am getting these errors ERROR: t

[SR-Users] Cluster: check/mark servers in cluster

Hi, all! I had in config: #!define KAMDB "cluster://postcash" loadmodule "db_cluster.so" modparam("db_cluster", "connection","con1=>postgres://user1:password1@host1/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "connection","con2=>postgres://user2:password2@host2/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "cluste

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio with mediaproxy-ng, 488 Not Acceptable Here

Hi, could you please post also your Chrome js developer log? Does the problem exist if you start the jssip clients without video support? Andrew On 02/03/2014 12:00 PM, Mihai Marin wrote: > Hello, > > Another weekend struggling to make a call from jssip to another jssip > behind firewall and I s

Re: [SR-Users] Hello from newbie

Also, while it may be a bit of an expensive venture for one person, if you've got a company behind you, you might consider coming to this year's Kamailio World conference in Berlin, April 2-4. It's only our second one, but the first one, last year, sold out beyond expectations, and we expect th

Re: [SR-Users] Hello from newbie

On 02/04/2014 06:25 AM, Alex Lake wrote: That's very useful, thanks. Your guess as to my assumption was 100% correct. I presume, therefore, that the Kamailio community have no ambitions to become more "app"y. To be honest, I can quite sympathise with that. Well, yes and no. :-) On the one han

Re: [SR-Users] GSM PDU Decoding

On 02/04/2014 06:35 AM, Ramya Ramamurthy wrote: BTW, what is the use of the SMS Module in Kamailio. Thought it would decode the GSM SMS Packet and form a SIP Message embedded with the PDU as the message body. Correct me if am wrong. I believe this module provides a hardware interface to certai

Re: [SR-Users] Hello from newbie

That's very useful, thanks. Your guess as to my assumption was 100% correct. I presume, therefore, that the Kamailio community have no ambitions to become more "app"y. To be honest, I can quite sympathise with that. I will follow up on your other message as soon as I get a chance. Hi Alex, On

Re: [SR-Users] GSM PDU Decoding

Thanks Alex, for the quick response. BTW, what is the use of the SMS Module in Kamailio. Thought it would decode the GSM SMS Packet and form a SIP Message embedded with the PDU as the message body. Correct me if am wrong. Thanks, ~Ramya. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >

Re: [SR-Users] Hello from newbie

P.S. There is a dispatcher-oriented example config in the package that can help get you started: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=kamailio;a=blob;f=modules/dispatcher/doc/dispatcher.cfg;h=8c0fc4c1d7adc783bc8e85d0ceed7e59a3e13a43;hb=HEAD But the central idea is really quite simple:

Re: [SR-Users] Hello from newbie

Hi Alex, On 02/04/2014 04:52 AM, Alex Lake wrote: Just trying to get to grips with Kamailio and thought I'd say hello to you all... Thank you, and welcome to the list and the community! Not sure if this is of any interest, but I've found it quite hard to get into Kamailio compared to (say)

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.

On 04 Feb 2014, at 11:46, Alex Balashov wrote: > I would like to report a bug: the transactional layer in chan_sip does not > exist. :-) Too late, chan_pjsip has an external transaction layer. Bug closed. /O > > > "Olle E. Johansson" wrote: >> >> On 04 Feb 2014, at 10:43, Klaus Darilion

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.

I would like to report a bug: the transactional layer in chan_sip does not exist. :-) "Olle E. Johansson" wrote: > >On 04 Feb 2014, at 10:43, Klaus Darilion >wrote: > >> Asterisk's transcation layer is quite buggy - so it may also be that >the reINVITE with Cseq 103 is a retransmission of a p

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.

On 04 Feb 2014, at 10:43, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Asterisk's transcation layer is quite buggy - so it may also be that the > reINVITE with Cseq 103 is a retransmission of a previous transaction (which > was not stopped correctly). > You are wrong. The transaction layer in chan_sip is NOT bugg

[SR-Users] Hello from newbie

Just trying to get to grips with Kamailio and thought I'd say hello to you all... Not sure if this is of any interest, but I've found it quite hard to get into Kamailio compared to (say) Freeswitch. This is not meant as criticism at all, but if you're looking to make it easier, I may be able

[SR-Users] Kamailio World 2014 - New speakers and presentations

Slightly less than two months to the start of Kamailio World 2014 [1] the organization of the event is getting accelerated. We received plenty of interesting proposals so far, we expect to end the Call for Speakers very soon, earlier than previously announced. If

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.

Asterisk's transcation layer is quite buggy - so it may also be that the reINVITE with Cseq 103 is a retransmission of a previous transaction (which was not stopped correctly). regards Klaus On 04.02.2014 08:52, dotnetdub wrote: Hi Olle, Just a quick update.. I've gone through this in detai

Re: [SR-Users] Proxied authentication

On Monday 03 February 2014 20:59:57 Pete Ashdown wrote: > As far as I understand, I need to rewrite the authentication information > with UAC? However, UAC's uacreg table seems to tie remote users to > remote destinations, when all I want to do is authenticate all calls > routed to the destination

Re: [SR-Users] Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.

On 04 Feb 2014, at 08:52, dotnetdub wrote: > Hi Olle, > > Just a quick update.. > > I've gone through this in detail and the issue is actually that > asterisk sends an UPDATE with CSeq: 104 UPDATE > > and when FS respond OK asterisk then sends its REINVITE with CSeq: 103 INVITE > > As far a

[SR-Users] Kamailio "ubuntu precise" repository DOWN

Hi folks, I noticed that the "Ubuntu precise"-repositories went down this night and not yet up again. Is this a temporary problem? ## [...] Err http://deb.kamailio.org precise/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://deb.kamaili