Re: [SR-Users] kamailio presence server becomes unresponsive

2013-12-20 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > the bt is from custom timer process, which doesn't handle sip requests > from the network. ok, that just happened to be the one that according to 'top' used most cpu time. > Do a 'kamctl ps' and the select one of the sip workers to grab the back > with gdb.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.1, Debian Squeeze, RTPProxy 1.2.1 Segfault

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, you should enable core dumping - that should be via running 'ulimit -c unlimited' before you start rtpproxy. If you get the coredump, then grab the backtrace with gdb, it should show where rtpproxy crashed. With that info, maybe we can spot a fix for it. Hopefully rtpproxy package is

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio presence server becomes unresponsive

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the bt is from custom timer process, which doesn't handle sip requests from the network. Do a 'kamctl ps' and the select one of the sip workers to grab the back with gdb. Cheers, Daniel On 20/12/13 15:22, Juha Heinanen wrote: once in a while kamailio 4.0 presence server becomes unr

[SR-Users] Kamailio 4.1, Debian Squeeze, RTPProxy 1.2.1 Segfault

2013-12-20 Thread Jr Richardson
Hi All, root@sip-router3-ve206:/etc/kamailio# kamailio -V version: kamailio 4.1.0 (x86_64/linux) 350d2e Doing some testing, can't seem to get rtpproxy to not segfault. I've loaded version from deb-squeeze pkg, from source http://b2bua.org/chrome/site/rtpproxy-1.2.1.tar.gz and from git:// sippy.g

[SR-Users] Kamailio v4.0.5 Released

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v4.0.5 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the stable branch 4.0, that includes fixes since release of v4.0.4. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on installations of v4.0.x. Deployments r

Re: [SR-Users] Caller Not Receiving RTP Feed

2013-12-20 Thread Benjamin Trent
Hugh, Thank you for the response, however, now neither the callee or the caller are getting a feed. I am not sure if the nat requires symmetric RTP. If there is a way to determine that, please let me know. Summery, even with Hugh's possible solution, this still does not work. Thank you again, b

Re: [SR-Users] ack not transfer kamailio-3.3.4

2013-12-20 Thread dolphin
Hello, About fix_nated_contact () problem has been resolved. Thanks for your help. The reason is that when k2 sent to k1 200 ok, k1 should not do fix_nated_contact to ua1. k2 received ack signal must be ua2 uri address k2 debug: DEBUG: [parser/msg_parser.c:624]: SIP Request: DEBUG: [parser

[SR-Users] Caller not receiving RTP feed

2013-12-20 Thread Benjamin Trent
Hey all, I have kamailio set up behind a nat(port restricted, with firewall rules to allow sip transactions and allowing rtpproxy packet handling if needed) on Amazon EC2. I can register and calls complete, however, the Caller(the one initiating the transaction) receives no rtp media feed. I am ru

Re: [SR-Users] how to detect un-REGISTER

2013-12-20 Thread Alex Balashov
Yes; such a request will have either a Contact with an ;expires=0 attribute, or an Expires: 0 header, e.g. if($ct =~ ";expires=0") or if(is_present_hf("Expires") && $hdr(Expires) == "0") -- Alex On 12/20/2013 11:44 AM, Henry Fernandes wrote: Is there a Kamailio module/function to de

[SR-Users] how to detect un-REGISTER

2013-12-20 Thread Henry Fernandes
Is there a Kamailio module/function to detect if a REGISTER request is for unregistering? -H ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [SR-Users] Caller Not Receiving RTP Feed

2013-12-20 Thread Hugh Waite
Hi Ben, Some NATs require symmetric RTP, so that source and destination ports are the same for incoming and outgoing media streams. This can be configured using the 'w' flag to rtpproxy_manage in the NATDETECT route. rtpproxy_manage("cow"); Regards, Hugh On 20/12/2013 16:13, Benjamin Trent

[SR-Users] Caller Not Receiving RTP Feed

2013-12-20 Thread Benjamin Trent
Hey all, **I apologize if this is a duplicate, I received a bounce back on my first email. I have kamailio set up behind a nat(port restricted, with firewall rules to allow sip transactions and allowing rtpproxy packet handling if needed) on Amazon EC2. I can register and calls complete, however,

[SR-Users] RES: RES: Kamailio IMS - VM

2013-12-20 Thread Bruno Cruz
Hello Carsten! I was wondering if I can be of any service with preparing the vbox image? Best regards, Bruno C. De: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] em nome de Carsten Bock [cars...@ng-voice.com] Enviado: seg

[SR-Users] kamailio presence server becomes unresponsive

2013-12-20 Thread Juha Heinanen
once in a while kamailio 4.0 presence server becomes unresponsive, i.e., does not process any requests. below is bt full of a process that at that time takes most of the cpu time. rls_notifier_processes is not set, i.e., it defaults to 1. does the bt give any clue why kamailio is unresponsive?

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailo - Problems with RTP streaming.

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the log errors don't seem related to rtp proxying. Can you paste here what you have in kamailio.cfg at line 943? The other error in syslog is related to a duplicate key, most probably in cdrs table or some other table you populate with sql_query() from kamailio.cfg -- the conflict is o

Re: [SR-Users] planning release of v4.0.5

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, here is a quick reminder for those willing to push patches to branch 4.0 before release of 4.0.5. Cheers, Daniel On 18/12/13 09:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, I am considering to release a new version out of branch 4.0 (previous stable branch) before Christmas holidays.

Re: [SR-Users] ACC issue on 4.0 trunk when doing serial fork

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, in failure route is given the SIP message as it was at the moment of transaction (e.g., the headers added/removed in request_route will be still kept there, but not those added in branch_route or other failure_route blocks). It would be good to get access to the attributes of the bran