Re: [SR-Users] error handling

Sounds good - but I do not know howo to handle that. Do you have a config example? Von: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] Im Auftrag von Carsten Bock Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. November 2013 20:52 An: SR-Users Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] error handling

Re: [SR-Users] error handling

You could check, if you can send the announcement as early media (183 Session progress) and afterwards decline the call from FreeSwitch. In this case, you should not get a 200 Ok from FreeSwitch, but another SIP reply, which you could mofify in yout Kamailio config... Carsten Am 24.11.2013 20:44

Re: [SR-Users] error handling

Sorry – I do not understand what you mean … I added the following code at the end of the failure_route – seems to work if (t_grep_status("404")){ xlog("L_INFO", "ORO Status 404 - not found"); t_reply("404", "not found"); exit; } V

Re: [SR-Users] error handling

Acc_db_request Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Oliver Roth wrote: > > Hi all > > Question about error handling with kamailio. > > We send call to carrier and get back error 404. > In carrierfailureroute we catch up this error and send call to an internal > freeswitch th

Re: [SR-Users] error handling

Flag the call as missed internally in your accounting or write to the missed acc table there is a method in acc documentation. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Oliver Roth wrote: > > Hi all > > Question about error handling with kamailio. > > We send call to carrier and

[SR-Users] error handling

Hi all Question about error handling with kamailio. We send call to carrier and get back error 404. In carrierfailureroute we catch up this error and send call to an internal freeswitch that plays a voiceprompt saying: "destination not available" In accounting this calls is collected like a "no

Re: [SR-Users] Use of t_cancel_callid() to drop an early dialog

Hello Guillaume, I pushed two commits on master branch: - http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=777dd5e28ff6b4fcc3b1c44e841eb415c974075f - http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=60372d613544af1f8f06122eb77fa2a9636a6c3a The changes re

Re: [SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

On 11/23/13 1:00 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote: the patch worked is it safe to commit to 4.0? Yes, I backported in the git branch 4.0. Cheers, Daniel On Nov 21, 2013 4:34 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > wrote: > > If you still have the old core, can you get the content

Re: [SR-Users] reload to memory is much slower and has problms after upgrade to 3.3.2 and using mem_join=1

Hi, It has been a while. Still, I have some problems with reloading data into shared memory. I can obviously notice that there is always an increase of shmem after each reload. When my system starts, it has 4G of memory reserved and approximately 0.8G is populated at start. After 30 days,