Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Admin Book

Looking good - count me in for a copy :). On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > being asked for quite a while about this topic, I can give now more > details about if there is or is going to be any time soon Kamailio book. We > are just about to complete

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Admin Book

Daniel, that would be awesome!!! can't wait to read it! Neill...;o) Aeonvista Ltd Opening Up New Ideas On 7 August 2013 19:34, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > being asked for quite a while about this topic, I can give now more > details about if there is or is going to be any ti

[SR-Users] Kamailio Admin Book

Hello, being asked for quite a while about this topic, I can give now more details about if there is or is going to be any time soon Kamailio book. We are just about to complete the 22nd chapter (over 280 A4 pages of content), with 3-5 still planned to get in this edition. More details about

Re: [SR-Users] Content-Type Header missing from third part registration

On 07.08.2013 13:42, Ziad Habchi wrote: Hi , I managed to run Kamailio to replace OpenIMSCore. I am using boghe client to sign in, when I do so , my registration is forwarded as per the trigger point to my AS server. As I notice , the REGISTER request miss Content-Type header which is mandato

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy patch for XMLRPC notifications

Actually, mediaproxy-ng plays no role in an SEMS SBC installation. Both work pretty independent from each other: mediaproxy-ng is triggered from Kamailio and SEMS as a B2BUA is triggered using bare SIP (most likely also from Kamailio). mediaproxy-ng will notify SEMS directly, if an RTP-Timeout occu

[SR-Users] Content-Type Header missing from third part registration

Hi , I managed to run Kamailio to replace OpenIMSCore. I am using boghe client to sign in, when I do so , my registration is forwarded as per the trigger point to my AS server. As I notice , the REGISTER request miss Content-Type header which is mandatory in the 3gpp TS . Is this configur

[SR-Users] rtpproxy patch for XMLRPC notifications

Carsten Bock wrote: currently mediaproxy-ng only does timeout notifications only towards a SEMS-SBC, not towards Kamailio. :-( what role does mediaproxy-ng play in sems sbc installation? is mediaproxy-ng used because sems does not support RTP/SAVPF or are there some other use cases as well?

Re: [SR-Users] (Kamailio/RTPproyx) Public -> LAN -> Asterisk (1, 2, .., n)

Finally it's working: #!define ASTERISK_LAN1 2.2.2.0/24 # End second LAN for PBXs - tunneling with LAN1 over OpenVPN: #!define ASTERISK_LAN2 3.3.3.0.0/24 rtpproxy in bridge mode. And route[NATMANAGE] from Asipto tutorial ( http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-as

Re: [SR-Users] Workings of the kamailio dispatcher module

Alright, thanks! -Original Message- From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 12:27 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Workings of the kamailio dispa

Re: [SR-Users] Workings of the kamailio dispatcher module

Grant, On 08/07/2013 05:00 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote: How does the dispatcher module handle the priorities in the dispatcher table? For example: ID;Set;Destination;Priority 1;1;192.168.16.10;1 2;1;192.168.16.11;2 Which one will be chosen first? I would assume, the higher the priority numbe

Re: [SR-Users] Workings of the kamailio dispatcher module

How does the dispatcher module handle the priorities in the dispatcher table? For example: ID;Set;Destination;Priority 1;1;192.168.16.10;1 2;1;192.168.16.11;2 Which one will be chosen first? I would assume, the higher the priority number, the higher the priority, right? Regards, Grant -O