[SR-Users] Publish Failed

Hi, I installed and configured the latest Kamalio and all the features works except PRESENCE Also it works with NAT clients with RTPProxy. When I register with Jitsi or QuteCom I get 5(10515) ERROR: presence [publish.c:388]: No E-Tag and no body found 6(10517) INFO: presence [notify.c:1601]: NO

[SR-Users] how to install kamailio with websocket function and msrp function on ubuntu？

hi, i am chinese,i am not good at kamailio.i want to install kamailio with websocket function and msrp function on ubuntu,could you give me a help？ ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.or

Re: [SR-Users] How to use Kamailio as load balancer

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Khoa Pham wrote: > Hi, > > As someone asked in > http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2010-December/066792.html > about TCP overload, Daniel answerd that > > "if you have some lengthily operations that have to be applied to your sip > traffic and you get

Re: [SR-Users] Max concurrent TCP connection that Kamailio support ?

Hi Yang Hong, thanks for your reply and those papers 1. When client make TCP connection, it usually get [FIN,ACK] and [RST] from server. Does that mean that server has reach max TCP connection limit, or server is busy handling other connections? P/S: proposed that my server is very strong On Mo

[SR-Users] How to use Kamailio as load balancer

Hi, As someone asked in http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2010-December/066792.html about TCP overload, Daniel answerd that "if you have some lengthily operations that have to be applied to your sip traffic and you get congestion because of that, the solution is to use a kamailio as

[SR-Users] sip peering

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have built a kamailio based phone system along the lines of the tutorial below. I have updated it for version 4.0 and it is running successfully on Debian 7.0. I have set my system up with a Gandi SSL cert rather than a self signed one. http://

[SR-Users] max number of pipes for pipelimit module?

Hello, Is there a limit on the max number of pipes for pipelimit module? Thanks, Julia ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

[SR-Users] Presence and Cisco 79xx phones BLF

Is it possible to run on phones Cisco 79xx series BLFs? So to show the status of the shared lines. Phones registered with Kamailio. Andy ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://l

Re: [SR-Users] Max concurrent TCP connection that Kamailio support ?

Hi Khoa. The maximum number of concurrent TCP connections depend on the computational capacity of the server. Kamailio can be regarded as an application server of high performance SIP/VoIP. In the following post, the Kamailio user set max TCP connections to 64K. http://lists.sip-router.org/pipe

[SR-Users] Radius - new style AVP's (misc_radius)

Good day! Now I test new style AVP's for radius response storing. Today additional radius responses return in special radpair: SIP-AVP - name, string "email:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org session-timeout#161 nexthopip:h323/0001...@myvoip-gate.kamailio.org" - value. I don't know why developers ch

Re: [SR-Users] Question about relaying

Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2013, 16:54:29 schrieb Leo Brown: > I added record_route() and now I see an extra record-route and Via: header: > > .9INVITE sip:44800800...@pstn-out.netfuse.net SIP/2.0 > Record-Route: > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.13.242.55;branch=z9hG4bK388f.04bc8632.1 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.

Re: [SR-Users] Question about relaying

Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2013, 16:33:23 schrieb Leo Brown: > So record-route goes like a stack and moves the current contact one down the > chain. > > You could then presumably truncate the list of other routes for privacy if > needed? > [..] Hello, Kamailio can't provide "real" SBC functionality, but

Re: [SR-Users] Doing automatic unregister when a WEBSOCKET connection is closed.

> When stating "stable" and "bug-free" - my intention was relativly to that > feature in kamailio because it seems that it is still under development. > Moreover - certainly if i will find any problem while testing i would > submit a bug-report and bug-fixes if possible. > > and by the way, I fou

Re: [SR-Users] Do we need rtpproxy for all kind of NAT?

6 maj 2013 kl. 09:49 skrev Klaus Darilion : > > > On 04.05.2013 16:37, John Chen wrote: >> Hi, >> I can configure kamailio + rtpproxy to enable calling between user >> behind the NAT. Thanks for the example config, it is very easy to did it. >> >> Do we need rtprpoxy for all kind of NAT? >> >

Re: [SR-Users] Do we need rtpproxy for all kind of NAT?

On 04.05.2013 16:37, John Chen wrote: Hi, I can configure kamailio + rtpproxy to enable calling between user behind the NAT. Thanks for the example config, it is very easy to did it. Do we need rtprpoxy for all kind of NAT? From what i have read, only symmetric NAT that hard to be traversal-