Hi all, excuse the basic nature of my question, I'm just starting out.
I've read in a tutorial that it is possible to connect from asterisk to
Kamailio and for asterisk to use the Kamailio db for authentication. However, I
also read that it is possible to connect to astereisk from Kamailio for
Greetings,
I'm in the process of adding logic to 'detect' the direction of my
message, I have to set:
rtpproxy_manage("ei")
or
rtpproxy_manage("ie")
respectively. Rather then hard-coding IP addresses in my
configuration, I was curious how other people over come this? Perhaps
tagging their call c
On 01/30/2013 07:36 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 09:31 AM, Julia wrote:
>> We need some number manipulation for outgoing calls to PSTN GW.
>> The same manipulations must be in "ru" and "tu", because our PSTN GW adds
>> redirection when tu ≠ ru.
>> When we used INVITE re-parsing for CANC
Yes, we know it's wrong.
But if we really need it, is there a way to do it?
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 4:36 PM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
On 01/30/2013 09:31 AM, Julia wrote:
> We need some number manipulation for outgoing calls to PSTN GW.
> The same manipulations must be in "ru" and "tu", because our PSTN GW adds
> redirection when tu ≠ ru.
> When we used INVITE re-parsing for CANCEL, modified "tu" is not included.
I would say you
the undefined
symbol sem_post from the ims_registrar_pcscf.so module. Errors below. I
also ran strace and the output is at
http://barry.flanagan.ie/dl/kamailio-ims-error-20130130.txt
kamailio -c -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg
loading modules under
/usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib64/kamai
We need some number manipulation for outgoing calls to PSTN GW.
The same manipulations must be in "ru" and "tu", because our PSTN GW adds
redirection when tu ≠ ru.
When we used INVITE re-parsing for CANCEL, modified "tu" is not included.
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-
Hello Julia,
There is a very real question that should probably be asked: why would you want
to do that?
Kamailio provides many capabilities, but just because you can, doesn't mean you
should. :-)
With that in mind, I don't know of any SIP scenario in which altering the To
header in a CANC
Hi,
probably the best way is to simply use the uac_replace_to-method from
the uac module:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/uac.html#id2494560
(tested with 3.3)
Kind regards,
Carsten
2013/1/30 Julia :
> Hello all,
>
>
>
>
>
> Is there any way to rewrite “tu” in CANCEL message i
Hello all,
Is there any way to rewrite "tu" in CANCEL message in 3.2.1?
We use remove_hf / insert_hf for INVITE's "tu" modification before
t_relay.
It works fine, but it doesn't work for CANCEL (INVITE re-parsing is
disabled).
Ths,
___
On 1/30/13 5:08 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Daniel,
The #!KAMAILIO is something I don't see in documentation. There's some
old communication on the various flavour markers in the config file, but
can you describe it a bit so we can add it to the core cookbook in the
wiki? You referred to it here
2013/1/29 Ramaseshi reddy kolli :
>
> Hi,
>
> i am using kamailio 3.3 version please help me with this issue.
>
> 1) Registered from SIP end point, kamailio added row in location table
>
> 2) Now using same SIP account details, pushed registration entry using
> kamctl ul add , instead of overwriti
On 30 January 2013 11:25, Carsten Bock wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> i commited some fixes for the Rx-Interface.
> You will also need to update the config, since i added a few fixes
> there as well.
>
>
Thanks very much Carsten, I will give it a go and let you know!
-Barry Flanagan
> Kind regards,
Hi Barry,
i commited some fixes for the Rx-Interface.
You will also need to update the config, since i added a few fixes
there as well.
Kind regards,
Carsten
2013/1/29 Barry Flanagan :
> On 29 January 2013 13:40, Barry Flanagan wrote:
>>
>> On Mon Jan 28 10:18:01 CET 2013, Daniel said:
>>
>> >
30 jan 2013 kl. 10:22 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> thanks for reporting back.
>
> What I wanted to know is if you have first line in kamailio.cfg as:
>
> #!KAMAILIO
>
> just to figure out if it is the more the script variable are resolved.
Daniel,
The #!KAMAILIO is something
Hi,
i think, i found it. I will make some tests and commit a change.
Kind regards,
Carsten
2013/1/29 Barry Flanagan :
> On 29 January 2013 13:40, Barry Flanagan wrote:
>>
>> On Mon Jan 28 10:18:01 CET 2013, Daniel said:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > do you still get the issues? The ims modules were
Carsten,
On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Carsten Maass wrote:
> Or does it mean, the authentication is rejected because the local part
> 030123456789 in URI does not match the subscriber 979?
Indeed, this is what happens when you call auth_check with flag "1":
if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "1"))
Hello,
thanks for reporting back.
What I wanted to know is if you have first line in kamailio.cfg as:
#!KAMAILIO
just to figure out if it is the more the script variable are resolved.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/30/13 8:48 AM, vito wrote:
Hello,
I have:
# Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v3.3
# Kama
Have you enabled the acc db accounting in kamailio config file?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/29/13 8:28 PM, Scott, Matt wrote:
Anybody have a working model?
I am following here, but I can't load kam with this code.
http://kb.asipto.com/siremis:install32x:accounting
# ==
19 matches
Mail list logo
