[SR-Users] Dokuwiki upgraded

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, fyi, I upgraded dokuwiki to latest version, switching to the new default template (which is not bad at all, btw) as the old one is not yet fully compatible. If you find any issue, report to devel mailing list. It is about the wiki for v3.2+: - http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ Cheers, D

[SR-Users] NAPTR for TLS only

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel Pocock
I'm just wondering if anyone can comment on expected and actual behavior if there is only a NAPTR record for TLS, e.g. I have: sip5060.net. INNAPTR10 0 "s" "SIPS+D2T" "" _sips._tcp.sip5060.net. and I don't have any entry for "SIP+D2U" or "SIP+D2T" If some third party Kamaili

Re: [SR-Users] TLS questions

2013-01-11 Thread Iurii Andamasov
Hello, 1 On 11.01.2013, at 16:03, Fabian Borot wrote: > > > Hi, we need to implement TLS in our current setup and have some questions > about it: > > 1- We have a farm of Asterisk servers behind our kamailio proxy. The call > flow is Customers/Providers <--> Proxy <--> Asterisks. > Is it pos

Re: [SR-Users] TLS questions

2013-01-11 Thread Vitaliy Aleksandrov
On 01/11/2013 05:03 PM, Fabian Borot wrote: Hi, we need to implement TLS in our current setup and have some questions about it: 1- We have a farm of Asterisk servers behind our kamailio proxy. The call flow is Customers/Providers <--> Proxy <--> Asterisks. Is it possible to have TLS only be

[SR-Users] TLS questions

2013-01-11 Thread Fabian Borot
Hi, we need to implement TLS in our current setup and have some questions about it: 1- We have a farm of Asterisk servers behind our kamailio proxy. The call flow is Customers/Providers <--> Proxy <--> Asterisks. Is it possible to have TLS only between the Customers/Providers and the Proxy a

[SR-Users] Development is frozen for v4.0.0

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, last midnight was the term to freeze the development for next major release v4.0.0. For a while, the GIT must branch should get only commits related to bug fixes, documentation improvements and updates of the additional tools. If any developer needs to store code of new features in th

Re: [SR-Users] PV: PAI vs. PPI

2013-01-11 Thread Hugh Waite
Hi Klaus, I have been working on improving the PPI/PAI handling, my reason is to easily retrieve the 1st and 2nd header using an index where there may be a tel: or sip: URI or both (but no more than one each). I haven't been adding new pv's for each uri part, but have been using the selects $(

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio World Conference - Registration is open

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Morten, On 1/11/13 9:49 AM, Morten Isaksen wrote: Anyone else have trrouble registering with bank transfer? When I click submit I just get redirected to http://conference.kamailio.com/k01/ all is fine, it is configured to do this redirect. You should have received an email confirmation tha

[SR-Users] Kamailio on Twitter

2013-01-11 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Hello! For those of you that have missed it: You can now follow the project on Twitter: @kamailioproject https://twitter.com/kamailioproject Amongst the latest news are Kamailio at Fosdem 2013, Code freeze for kamailio 4.0 and the Kamailio World conference now open for registrations. Tonight

Re: [SR-Users] LCR

2013-01-11 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
Hello, try printing the $ru with xlog statement when the request comes into the server and in the beginning of route[LCR]. On 11/01/2013 01:50, Douglas Ugalde wrote: > Hi, > > Im trying to configure LCR in Kamailio 3.3.3 but I dont Know how can I > do to fix this error: > > ERROR: lcr [lcr_mod.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio World Conference - Registration is open

2013-01-11 Thread Morten Isaksen
Anyone else have trrouble registering with bank transfer? When I click submit I just get redirected to http://conference.kamailio.com/k01/ /Morten On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > the registration for Kamailio World Conference is now open! You can see

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT - best practice

2013-01-11 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 11.01.2013 02:12, schrieb Richard Brady: Hi Klaus Thanks for posting the working solution. You are right that mhomed=1 won't help if the sockets both have same IP address. That's true. Though I think if you used it with two different IPs and the correct routing tables on the OS then it