Peter Dunkley writes:
> One requirement of an outbound capable registrar is that if a flow fails
> (edge proxy returns a 430) the registrar should realise that the flow is
> now dead and remove that contact binding from its database so it is not
> used again as well as trying the next contact. I
Peter Dunkley writes:
> I was wondering if you could provide an example of how to use
> lookup()/lookup_branches(), t_load_contacts(), t_next_contacts(), and
> t_next_contacts_flows() for registrar supporting outbound with an edge
> proxy?
peter,
in my tests i did like this:
1) in route block,
Hi,
Since there is no way to limit the result set to 1, I tried to use
raw_query inside msilo module. Everytime it executes, it is crashing. The
same query if I run in mysql shell, it is returning successfully.
Here is the code That I added:
query_len = snprintf(query, 2048, "SELECT * FROM %.*s
Hi Juha,
I was wondering if you could provide an example of how to use
lookup()/lookup_branches(), t_load_contacts(), t_next_contacts(), and
t_next_contacts_flows() for registrar supporting outbound with an edge
proxy?
>From the documentation of these functions it does look like parallel and
seri
Hi Juha,
I assumed as much, but what I haven't had the chance to do myself yet is the
full end-to-end scenario where the Kamailio edge proxy indicates a broken flow
and the registrar successfully re-routes through another flow.
Peter
On 7 Jan 2013, at 19:46, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Peter Dunk
Hello.
I have a doubt about the WEIGHT value in the LCR module. In the past we
used the Kamailio version 1.5.2 and in that version LCR weight was
calculated by a little script called lcr_weight_script.php. There was not
“percent” values like 50% and 50% for two gateways despite that the
probab
Hello Daniel and Andrew,
Sorry to dig up an old thread, but I'm just now getting around to a more
permanent fix for this. Is there a way to urlencode the received parameter?
See:
http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/FS-4989
Thanks in advance,
Spencer
On Sep 25, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Daniel-Constanti
Peter Dunkley writes:
> I haven't been directly involved with the coding of the registrar stuff.
> This does sound like testing worth doing.
i did the registrar stuff and tested it with baresip, which supports
outbound. more testing is of course welcome.
-- juha
___
Hello Sammy,
Almost all of the answer is clear however it is not possible to point
the URLs to my Kamailio as those URLs are actually company URLs is it
OK to use subdomains for the purpose ?
Best regards,
Rumen
http://itradebg.com
On 7 January 2013 21:22, SamyGo wrote:
> Hi Rumen,
>
> Im sorry
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013, 16:14:59 schrieb Glenn O Larsen:
>>
>> Is there a way to read modparam config from a database?
> probably the configuration database module - cfg_db is implementing what
> you're
> searching for. But I per
Hi Rumen,
Im sorry to have missed the chance to give you extended details earlier. As
per my experience you've to do the following:
1. Load the domain.so module. Point the domain names (DNS URLs) to your
kamailio IP adress and add those domain names into the domain table.
2. Set the Registrar, A
Hello Kamailio, VoIP and asterisk gurus,
I have the following really complicated scenario to solve.
I have CompanyA which has extensions 100-120
I have CompanyB which has extensions 100-115
I have CompanyC which has extensions 100-130
Now I want to have all those extensions on a single kamailio
Greetings.
I have kamailio 3.3.3 setup on server behind the nat. Nat forwards ports
for tls/tcp/udp.
This setup worked without rls ok.
I added necessary modules - rls, pua, xcap etc.
Updated a config file and db.
Client application uploads xcap documents ok; after app sends subscribe
request to
Hello.
Are you plan to record a conference and publish on site ?
I'd like to visit but I can't. Would be good to see a recorded conference.
Thanks!
2013/1/7 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Hello,
>
> the registration for Kamailio World Conference is now open! You can see
> more details and register
On 01/07/2013 01:29 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> What I don't understand is why kamailio sets RURI of the OPTIONS message
> to value of "received" instead of the contact. I suspect a bug in the
> parser somewhere along these lines:
>
>> > rval =
>> > ul.get_all_ucontacts(buf,cb
Hello,
the registration for Kamailio World Conference is now open! You can see
more details and register at:
- http://conference.kamailio.com/k01/registration/
There is already a great group of speakers and interesting proposed
talks. More regarding the content will be published in the n
Hello,
I am running Kamailio 3.2.x, I am using udp mi to send a t_uac_dlg command,
:t_uac_dlg:
NOTIFY
sip:pho...@proxy.lan
.
.
"From:sip:dae...@proxy.lan
To:
Contact:sip:dae...@proxy.lan"
#
I would like to know if I can change the timeout for this request.
Running a packet sniffer on the proxy
Hi all!
On 04.01.2013 18:57, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
Hello Klauss,
I use record_route_preset for this kind of scenarios:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules_k/rr.html#id2550086
That was the main reason that I enhanced record_route_preset with the
second parameter (see the Note on string2).
Hello,
Thanks for links
It's works now.
On 07.01.2013, at 16:30, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> It depends on what you want to configure.
>
> If the softswitch shall be authenticated by TLS then of course you have to
> set "require_certificate=yes".
>
> Further, find out why the handshake fails.
It depends on what you want to configure.
If the softswitch shall be authenticated by TLS then of course you have
to set "require_certificate=yes".
Further, find out why the handshake fails. Use tcpdump/wireshark to find
out who sends the SSL alert. It seems the softswitch sends the alert:
t
Hi Richard,
I haven't been directly involved with the coding of the registrar stuff.
This does sound like testing worth doing.
Also worth adding tests to check that if you get a 430 back after
routing to one reg-id you can try the next.
Peter
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:54 +, Richard Brady wro
Hi Peter
Great work on this! We'd like to help you test.
The test I have in mind, which we could create using SIPp, would be to
register multiple contacts with the same instance-id (i.e. "sip.instance"
param) but different reg-id params. Then send an INVITE to that AoR and
make sure the forking i
Hi Richard!
I wonder why I have to set mhomed. In the scenario I described both
sockets are in the same network segment and I would guess that automatic
socket selection will not work and always chooses the same socket. I
think I have to set the proper outgoing socket manually with
force_send
Then it seems that this fix and is not related to your bug FS247. You
should re-open the bug report.
regards
Klaus
On 03.01.2013 17:21, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
My openSSL version is 0.9.8... According to
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Custom-free-routine-is-invoked-with-NULL-argument-in-open
Some Fritzbox devices don't accept the OPTIONS ping generated by
kamailio with RURI: sip:11.22.3.4:5060. In the location table we have:
received: sip:11.22.3.4:5060
contact: sip:user@11.22.3.4:5060;uniq=6633BC1386F4D4CC4EBD64DC7E967
path:
Kamailio version is 3.3.2 and the nathelper config is noth
25 matches
Mail list logo
